12 Monkeys
In a world where the human race has been ravaged by a deadly virus, Bruce Willis must save the day! Or maybe not. Let’s find out…
Disclaimer:
The movie I’ll be reviewing this week is rated: R
This review contains adult content, and of course, spoilers!
Okay, for those who’re unaware of this movie: same here. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve seen it before, but I found it especially difficult to follow. Much like my Pan’s Labyrinth review, I’m coming back into this movie somewhat blind having seen the movie once in the past and having forgotten most of what happened. The main thing I do remember from the first time I watched this movie is that I walked away from it feeling underwhelmed. Ultimately I didn’t feel like anything deeper was being offered, I couldn’t make any sort of emotional connection with the characters, and whatever the intention of the filmmakers was: it wasn’t coming across to me on-screen. Although, there were still things that I did like about the movie, mostly the performances, cinematography, and creative-looking future the filmmakers created. Also, coming back to this film after being away from it as long as I have makes me hopeful that maybe there is something here that I missed the first time.
Mainly because that’s also one of my principles when it comes to films. If the first time I saw a film a long time ago I had a good impression of it, I tend to be harsher on it. However, if the first time I saw a film long ago I had a bad or neutral impression of it, I try my best to be forgiving and open to discovering something new about it. It’s my firmly held belief that being open to different points of view can only help us learn and grow as people. Sure in the case of movies the stakes are a lot lower, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t any value in it. That’s probably more serious than I intended it to be, I don’t mean to bring the mood down. The movie will do that for me anyway. So if you’re willing to join me on this adventure, well there’s no time like the present!
If you’re ready, come with me back in time to the year 1996, don’t forget to restrain your twitchy Brad Pitts, and let’s take a look at 12 Monkeys!
We start off with this brief bit of expository text before immediately cutting to a stylized flashback of our main character James Cole (played in this flashback by Joseph Melito) witnessing a shooting in an airport when he was a child:
This is followed by a cut back to present time with our protagonist (played by Bruce Willis) where our main character is chosen for “Volunteer Duty.” Yeah, one of the main things you’ll probably notice about this film from the outset is that much of the world, how it works, and why things are the way they are is kept very vague. I will give credit where credit is due though, there are several subtle touches (either visual or scripted) which help explain things a bit more. For example, we see Cole on “Volunteer Duty” being forced above ground where he collects various animals in jars. Why? Well, considering the opening text described this virus that ends up killing 5 billion people, you could reasonably assume that he’s gathering these small specimens for the purposes of analysis and hopefully to help develop a cure. This is confirmed when we see Cole go before a board of scientists who essentially act as this world’s version of government considering the only rule of law is survival and protection against a deadly disease at this point. It’s touches like these that make me enjoy the movie while I’m watching it. That and of course the mechanized future we see these characters inhabit.
A lot of the intrigue the movie creates for me is just in its intricate future design. We don’t even see that much of it since most of the time the film takes place in average city settings in the year 1996, but what is there really stays with you. Most of that is probably due to the fact that all of it was shot in front of the camera. Yes, none of this was done with CG and all of these sets were custom constructed including the future settings you saw, the mental institution we’ll see later, and the airport from the flashback. That’s no small feat, especially with a movie that’s this large in scale. Naturally the city scenes were shot on location, but it in no way takes away from the grandeur of the rest of these places. I will admit that some of the future designs can get to be a bit much though.
Anyway, you’re probably wondering about the story. I am too, but I’ll break it down as best I can. One of my larger issues with the film is that it can be very difficult to follow. When the prison guards send in Cole to be examined by the scientists and bring up his past history, the PA system that discusses protocol on the way to the board room, and what the point of any of this is supposed to be is pretty muddy. I’ve watched this movie 4 times already and I can’t for the life of me understand what the heck any of these characters are saying and how it’s supposed to tie into the plot in this scene and several others involving the scientists later. At this point I think the general purpose of Cole going back in time isn’t so much to prevent the virus from ever breaking out, but more to collect samples like we saw him do earlier to help develop a cure in the present (which is actually the future). What eventually goes wrong is that he ends up going off on his own and trying to prevent the disease from ever breaking out, against the scientist’s original intentions, which is what ends up causing more problems. Granted that could be completely off, I have no idea.
Like what I said in my Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny review, I’m not against vagueness in movies. Sometimes keeping things open to interpretation ends up adding more to the material which makes the film stand out in the minds of audiences resulting in them returning to it years later to speculate about it more. Examples of films that utilize this well are: Inception which presents the idea of the spinning top identifying whether the main character is dreaming or not, Lost in Translation which has Bill Murray’s character whisper something to Scarlett Johansson’s character we never understand, and Pulp Fiction where the item kept in the briefcase is never shown. These moments work well in these films because they’re usually small details that allow you to fill in the gaps yourself as the audience member given your interpretation of the characters and material the movie presented to you. Where I don’t believe vagueness works well is with the overall plot of the movie. This is what the issue is here in 12 Monkeys, the whole time I never get a solid grasp of what’s happening and why it’s happening. Every movie should have a definitive reason to exist and that should be made clear in the plot and the actions the characters take, but for some reason that’s kept vague here. This results in a consistently empty feeling I have while watching which just makes me question why I’m even watching this in the first place. That’s not a good sign.
One thing I do like regarding the vagueness is how it’s not entirely clear whether Cole is just hallucinating all of this time travel stuff and is actually an escaped mental patient, or if it is actually real at first. In the opening after the scientists grill Cole it fades to black before we fade into Baltimore in the year 1990 where renowned psychiatrist and the (creepy (I’ll explain later)) love interest Kathryn Railly (played by Madeleine Stowe) gets called in to take a look at Cole fresh off of being caught in the street beating up 5 cops. What does help make up for the all-over-the-place plot is the believable and grounded performances which I honestly enjoy watching. This scene in particular does a great job of portraying Cole as a half rational person trying to achieve a goal by any means necessary and a half escaped mental patient like I said earlier with Kathryn being the healthy dose of reality caught in the middle.
The conversation eventually results in Kathryn having Cole transferred to the mental institution I mentioned earlier, Cole getting washed down in a scene clearly paralleling the decontamination scene from when Cole reentered the facility after going to the surface, and us being introduced to most people’s favorite part of this movie (me included): Brad Pitt as Jeffrey Goines.
While I don’t necessarily believe that Brad Pitt accurately portrays a character with a mental illness, no matter how many times I watch this movie I only ever see an actor playing mentally ill, the reason I like this character so much is because he’s very entertaining to watch. In literally every scene he’s in I find my will to keep watching this film revitalized since he’s constantly stealing the show. Technically he does have significance to the plot, but I legit don’t care. If this movie were just Jeffrey in various public spaces ranting and stirring up a scene I wouldn’t feel let down at all. I could literally watch just that for hours and laugh uncontrollably. Even when the things he rants about make practically no sense, the energy Pitt brings to the character is electric. Also, in the context of when this movie came out in 1995, Brad Pitt wasn’t considered a big name dramatic actor, or really capable of portraying anything else on screen other than hotness (at least according to my mom). At the time he was still primarily seen as the guy to put in your movie when you want to get horny young girls in the theatre, not a person to turn to when you actually intend for him to act. This was supposedly the film that proved Brad Pitt could actually act and what provided him the jumping off point to become the widely recognized actor he is today. Whether that take is true or not I don’t really care because either way Jeffrey is hilarious.
So Jeffrey shows Cole around the facility until eventually Cole has a sit down with the institution’s lead psychiatrists which is also a fun-house mirror version of the board of scientists we’ve already seen further blurring the line between reality and fantasy in this world. Cole talks about how he suspects along with the scientists from the future that this virus that ends up wiping out 5 billion people was unleashed by the Army of the 12 Monkeys. I’d also like to take this opportunity to say that it’s always annoying in movies like this where people from the future come back in time to warn people about what’s coming expecting everyone to 100% believe them without question. See Cole, this is why you’re in a mental institution. He convinces the doctors to allow him to use the phone to call a specific number which ends up not being what he expected further making you question if any of this is real, but Cole puts together that the reason the phone call didn’t quite work was because he’s supposed to be in the year 1996, but he’s instead in the year 1990. If only those scientists were better with numbers.
We also get another brief look at Cole’s airport flashback (get used to that, there’s a lot of it in the movie) until we see Cole in bed where he catches a spider. A spider he eventually swallows. Alive. Do spiders just not bite anymore?
Jeffrey also presents Cole with the prospect of escape and he promises Cole that he can help him. This eventually results in Jeffrey Jeffrey-ing to the point where the orderlies come in and drag him away while also exposing the fact that his father is a famous virologist to Cole and exposing his ass to the audience. Never change Jeffrey. The next morning, Cole and Jeffrey sit together watching a program on TV discussing videos of experiments that scientists have been doing on animals that were leaked to the public by animal rights activists. Cole mentions to Jeffrey that maybe humanity needs to be wiped out since they seem so insistent on dabbling with things they don’t understand and Jeffrey finds that notion quite…interesting. It’s at this point Cole gets his daily meds which put him in an unresponsive state making it more difficult for him to follow through with Jeffrey’s plan especially since Jeffrey just so happened to steal the key to the door. By Jeffrey-ing it up again, Jeffrey’s able to create a distraction to allow Cole to stumble his way to escape. He eventually ends up getting caught, strapped to a table, sedated, and rolled into an isolation cell though, but it doesn’t last long.
So how did he do that? The movie presents the thought that maybe he somehow managed to break through his bonds, overcome his sedation, and climb the over 15 foot high wall to the top of the room and crawl through the air duct, but at this point it’s much more believable that he just went back to his original time. The institution staff is completely baffled and Cole, back in the “present” has a nice little chat with a disembodied voice. It’s unclear if this voice is another prisoner in another cell, a spy for the scientists, or just a voice in Cole’s head, but one thing that can’t be denied is that this voice has got some knowledge. He’s just as distrusting of the scientists as I am so I like him already, but the scientists end up grilling Cole again anyway about what he found out. Well it’s now that Cole rightfully calls out the scientists for sending him to the wrong year, yet they still act as if the lack of information they received on their subject was Cole’s fault. Despite not being politicians they sure act like them. So now they try to send him back to 1996 for realsies so he can actually complete his mission. This looks promising.
So Cole along with his friend Jose from earlier in the movie (played by Jon Seda) get sent back to WWI. Did I mention I don’t trust these scientist jerkoffs yet? Well I don’t. This little trip down world history lane gets Cole a free gunshot wound in the leg when we suddenly end up in 1996 with Kathryn Railly again. She’s teaching a class of people about her theoretical discovery the “Cassandra Complex” named after a woman from Greek legend who was condemned to be able to see into the future but never have anyone believe her which of course directly ties into what Cole has already experienced. Also, this guy’s here:
After leaving, Kathryn just so happens to come across Cole in the parking lot and he forces her to drive him to Philadelphia under the pretense that he’s armed. They have a bit of a shaky reintroduction to say the least until Cole asks Kathryn to turn on the radio because he’s supposed to receive a message. He instead gets an ad for the Florida Keys (by the way, the Florida Keys pops up a lot in this movie) and finds happiness again when he hears Fats Domino’s “Blueberry Hill” start playing which results in this interesting emotional moment:
To me, just the sheer contrast of emotions with Cole being elated upon returning to a safe and comfortable world while Kathryn is scared for her life and desperately trying to stay calm is equal amounts heartwarming, uncomfortable, and funny at the same time. On their drive they stop at a motel where Cole has another dream about the airport and notes that he recognized Kathryn in his dream. It’s around this point that I figured out what that’s going to end up being, but we’ll talk about it when we get there. What’s also funny is how Cole crawls over the tied up Kathryn so he can grab some money out of her purse for the vending machine. Mostly because it’s staged like he’s going to do something to her only to find out he was just hungry. After a while they make their way to Philadelphia and Cole points out red graffiti on the wall depicting the 12 Monkeys’ logo. See Kathryn, I was right! While she struggles with the concept of Cole being right about this, they run into a guy that has the same voice as the disembodied voice Cole heard in his prison cell in the “present”.
It’s unclear what exactly this is supposed to mean, especially since later in the movie they come across this guy again only for him to act like he doesn’t know them, but one thing it definitely does is blur more lines between is this all real or is Cole just crazy? The guy tells them about how the scientists keep track of their volunteers by putting a device in their teeth only to reveal to them that he ripped his own teeth out as well. With that out of the way, they make their way to an abandoned theatre because that’s where the graffiti trail leads, and -
By fending off their attackers (and killing them in the process), Cole manages to procure himself a gun which will prove to be quite useful, but also proves that he never had a weapon in the first place. When the two come across the hiding place of the 12 Monkeys by following the graffiti trail, Cole threatens them with the gun until they reveal what their plan is. They weirdly start talking about animal rights, protesting, and demonstrations which all, strangely enough, have nothing to do with deadly diseases that kill 5 billion people but they also admit that their leader is Jeffrey Goines. Yay, he’s in more of the movie! So after finding Jeffrey’s contact info they decide to pay him a visit, but not before Kathryn removes the bullet from Cole’s leg. Yeah, he’s been walking around with that this whole time. I equally don’t believe that he would’ve been able to last this long with a gunshot wound in his leg and that Kathryn would be able to adequately remove the bullet with only her knowledge as a psychiatrist to assist her in this situation. Anyway, we also get this weird moment:
It’s supposed to be a mystery whether he killed her or not since we see in a broadcast not too long from now that the police recovered a body from a ditch and suspect it might be Kathryn, but I’ll just reveal it: he didn’t kill her. So why did he grab her like that? Also there was practically no prompting to it whatsoever which just makes it even more awkward. At Jeffrey’s house we see how privileged he is since he lives in a mansion built on his father’s fame (his father played by Christopher Plummer) and how his father is currently throwing a fancy soirée in his own honor. I can see why Jeffrey called his father “God” now. Eventually some of the guards tell Jeffrey someone’s here to see him so he goes to see Cole only to shrug him off until he mentions the 12 Monkeys. Here Cole tries to get more information out of Jeffrey to see if he can try to stop him from spreading the virus which is also when Jeffrey reveals to Cole that he got the idea for the virus from him. When they were watching TV together earlier and Jeffrey heard Cole mention that maybe the human race deserves to be wiped out, he took that literally and pushed for his father to develop said virus (being a famous virologist).
Eventually a scuffle breaks out between the two, we get another Jeffrey patented rant, and Cole escapes using his usual Houdini tricks. Weird because he didn’t actually time travel this time, he just literally disappeared. I guess the script just interrupted the movie like “Hey, can we keep things moving?” Then we of course discover that Kathryn is still alive, Cole just stuffed her in the trunk (again, why did they shoot it all weird?) and she goes off on him. Security from the party eventually catches up with them but Cole disappears for realsies this time when he gets time traveled again. It’s around this part of the movie where it becomes definitively clear that the time travel that’s taking place is in fact real especially after Kathryn gets a call from the detectives that picked her up on party night saying that the bullet she removed from Cole’s leg is genuinely from WWI. Also she looks at this picture from the book she published a bit closer:
It’s definitely at this point in the movie where I’ve kinda just given up on the story. I mean it’s not really keeping me invested, the characters aren’t really that interesting, and I’m starting to get an idea of what this is all amounting to anyway, so I’m really questioning why I’m still watching this in the first place. Maybe they’ll grace me with another Jeffrey appearance.
One interesting concept that the movie does bring up in these scenes however is the fact that time travelling has a negative effect on your mental state. Like we’ve seen with Cole thus far, and when he gets zapped back to the “present” and presented with an official pardon from the scientists, he denies that any of this is real and starts to believe what Kathryn has been telling him about all these thoughts he’s been having. It’s all just in his head. In the end, he’s lost track of what’s real and what’s not because of his body and mind shifting back and forth between time periods constantly. When you think about it, that really makes a lot of sense and I’m surprised that not more time travel stories bring up this sort of concept. Hardly anybody in these stories are like The Doctor in the sense that their entire race of people exists to travel through and manipulate time, these are just regular people being brought back and forth through various stages of existence they were never meant to see to begin with so I totally buy that they would start questioning their reality because of it.
After discovering that Cole isn’t crazy, Kathryn calls and tries to warn Dr. Goines (Jeffrey’s father) to be wary of the Army of the 12 Monkeys since she believes they’ll try to steal his virus. He doesn’t believe her and the other person in the room considers that possibly Kathryn is beginning to succumb to her own Cassandra Complex that she described earlier.
Back in the “present” the scientists try to prep Cole for one last mission and in 1996 Kathryn catches up with Jeffrey and his 12 Monkeys crew. It’s here that a lot of the little tidbits from the movie previously start to fall into place. There’ve been several instances up until now in the meetings with the scientists and other various events that have taken place in the “present” that have pointed to potential clues as to who caused the outbreak of the virus. Most of them have pointed to the 12 Monkeys as the culprits and they’ve ranged from pictures of graffiti, newspaper clippings depicting key characters, images of protests, and various other parallel occurrences from the past and the “present”. I will admit that it is pretty fun for me as an audience member just recognizing all these things that have appeared in the movie already and now finally seeing what they were in reference to. We see this when Kathryn leaves a message on the same number that Cole tried calling in 1990 which is the same message that we heard earlier in the movie when the scientists played it for Cole, Kathryn’s graffiti is the same message that the scientists have a picture of in their board room, and it all comes to a head when Kathryn and Cole drop by a showing of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds and they start to put on disguises.
While Kathryn tells Cole they have flight reservations for Key West (there’s the Florida Keys again), Jeffrey and the 12 Monkeys have effectively carried out their plan. It started with them kidnapping Jeffrey’s father and it only gets worse from here. They release the animals from the zoo! What? Yeah, that’s their evil plan. So we find out that this whole time the Army of the 12 Monkeys never had anything to do with releasing the virus. At first I saw this as a major let down, granted I know I wasn’t that invested in the story that much to begin with, but that’s literally the name of the movie and it turns out it means nothing. Doesn’t that just feel weird? Well, after I’ve thought it over, it still feels kinda weird, but it’s also pretty funny. The whole time this movie was building up one thing and ends up delivering another which also kinda ties into the ending, but that’s coming up here real soon.
Once Kathryn and Cole make it to the airport, Cole tries to let the scientists know that the Army of the 12 Monkeys had nothing to do with the virus by leaving a message on the same number Kathryn called earlier. They end up receiving that message and send Jose to intercept Cole and he gives him a gun to finish the job. Wait, who is he supposed to shoot?
Unfortunately Cole doesn’t get an answer to that question before Kathryn shows up having figured out the puzzle. It was Dr. Goines’ assistant the whole time! Remember? That guy? Who was in like 2 scenes? Neither of which lasted longer than 2 minutes? That guy? Still lost? Here you go:
So yeah, our big villain now seems to be this random dude we barely saw before. Better? You know, the only way these bait-and-switches work is if the real culprit is equally or even more interesting than the first perceived threat. This is not an improvement. So they rush to intercept him and I was originally going to ask why this airport security seemed so lax until I remembered that this is 1996. Carry on. After trying as hard as they can to get past security, Cole ends up running after the guy and trying to shoot him recreating Cole’s flashback/dream that he’s been experiencing this whole movie. Surprise, young Cole was watching all this happen the whole time! Cole gets shot and killed and it’s revealed that he’s caught in a time loop and is weirdly responsible for his own childhood trauma.
Kathryn rushes to his side in his final moments because after the past however long they’ve been developing this weird sort of romance together. I wouldn’t mind it so much if the kid version of Cole wasn’t literally standing right in front of her. Isn’t it just so Breaking Dawn: Part 2 looking at a little boy from across the room knowing that he’ll eventually grow up to be the guy you wish would have sex with you? That’s just really creepy to me. Getting away from that nastiness, Dr. Goines’ assistant makes it onto his plane where we see one of the scientists sitting next to him and they discuss how humans are a sort of dying race destined for extinction. The movie closes with freshly traumatized young Cole staring into his wide angle lens until the credits begin to roll.
While you may not expect it considering the tone I’ve had throughout the majority of this review, I feel a sort of urge to try and defend this movie. You may be wondering “Why, you literally spent the majority of this review ragging on it?” but if I’m being fair, there is one thing that I haven’t discussed about this movie thus far: the point.
In the end, a lot of the problems I have with this film are still valid and still irk me as a viewer, but I’ve suddenly started to grow a deeper understanding of the reasoning behind it all. I meant every word I said in the introduction when I wrote it, but I now disagree with one of the points I made. I said that “Whatever the intentions of the filmmakers were, it wasn’t being portrayed on screen,” but I now see that as incorrect. Since I was having a hard time understanding what my feelings about this film were, I decided to ask someone else to watch the movie with me. This was my sister. At the end of our viewing, I asked her what she thought and she told me that it seemed like a very nihilistic film. When she said that, I knew exactly what she meant.
If there’s anything that’s consistently being portrayed in the film, it’s that certain things are inescapable no matter how hard you try to resist them. When it comes to timelines and the inner workings of the continuum, some things are just fated to be. This is what we see in 12 Monkeys. Despite Cole’s attempts to prevent the virus from breaking out and killing so many people, the timeline prevented him from doing that. You may remember that when Dr. Goines’ assistant sat down on the plane, next to him was one of the scientists. It’s my belief that this scientist came back in time to ensure that the timeline was left intact even at the cost of Cole’s life. Even she says to the assistant “I’m in insurance” which to me is her confession as to why she was there. This is a hard lesson to take, even for adults, that some things just can’t be avoided and knowing this as the filmmakers main thesis for the film to me justifies its existence.
Of course I do still have issues with the film, that I can’t deny. At the same time I do still like a lot of the concepts that this movie presents and hope to see those explored in other properties. I can’t say for sure if the 12 Monkeys TV series delves into these ideas more creatively than the film does since I unfortunately haven’t seen it yet, but even if that isn’t the case there are still things in this movie I wish to see more of. The creative future designs, the immersive camera angles, the brilliant performances, and those few nuggets of sci-fi inspiration for the next generation are what I love. While I still have problems following the overall story, getting invested in the action and the characters, as well as some downright confusing moments, some of these things I feel like I can forgive given the pros of the film. For instance the characters. I at first was disappointed that they weren’t especially interesting or developed, but knowing the filmmakers’ thesis for the film makes me realize that that wasn’t the point.
In the end, they made this film to get across a specific idea, and in the case of James Cole’s journey, I feel like it’s a really good encapsulation of that message. Maybe you aren’t quite sure if this film is for you or not, but I hope this review gave you a bit of clarity. Even with those difficulties I experienced while watching, I still overall feel glad that I saw it for those moments of the film that were truly unique and thought-provoking. If that’s enough for you, then by all means take a trip in your time machines this weekend movie night and experience 12 Monkeys for yourself!
I would personally rate this film a 3.5/5 monkeys. Like I explained before, I personally believe there are enough interesting concepts in this movie to make it worth seeing, but to some, the confusing story will certainly be difficult to overcome. For me, if I were to watch this film again it’d probably be once every 3 or 4 years, but I can see how many people could be inspired by it too, and that’s fine in my book.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I’m just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
The Sword in the Stone
Hmm, what would Disney’s version of the Arthur legend be? Well, we get our answer with, in my opinion, the underrated The Sword in the Stone!
You know what, I’m just gonna stop complaining. Disney practically owns everything already anyway, so it’s only a matter of time before I run into another one of their films. Also, this is still one that I always enjoyed as a kid. The Sword in the Stone, while never being considered as one of Disney’s greatest films, was still one that stood out to me as being distinctly different from most of Disney’s other classics. It was simple, yet compelling. It was calm and relaxed, yet adventurous and suspenseful. It was always a blend of contradictions that I hadn’t seen in many other Disney films as a kid which is mostly the reason why I still remember it today. On top of that, having it be Disney’s interpretation of the age old King Arthur legend that manages to be both epic and childish at the same time is quite an accomplishment (primarily childish though).
The way the filmmakers really got around that aspect of the story was by having it be the King Arthur legend before the King Arthur legend. Basically it was the origin story behind Arthur which most other renditions of the legend that I had seen at the time never touched on which made me feel like it was more of an obscure and creative interpretation of the tale. Much like every other film I’ve covered in the past so far, it’s definitely not perfect and we’ll be looking at it in detail today. Maybe in the process we’ll also see more of why this story stands out to me among the rest of Disney’s hand-drawn lineup, and definitely why I consider this film to be underrated especially when compared to Disney films like The Lion King, Beauty and the Beast, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Cinderella, and the like.
With all that being said, let’s find a gay magic man in the woods (I’ll go into more detail on that later) who’ll turn us into various critters and zap our way into The Sword in the Stone!
We begin the film like most other animated films began at the time with an overture including each of the songs we’re about to hear in the movie against bright backgrounds and stylistic credits. It’s here that I also learned that this movie was actually based on a novel that was released in 1938 by the author T. H. White of the same title. Unfortunately I don’t have the book in my possession so I won’t be able to make any comparisons between the two pieces, but I will still point out that the songwriters are the Sherman Brothers, the same two brothers who did the songs in Mary Poppins which I think is really cool!
After our introductory credits, we’re given a brief backstory sung by a minstrel-type narrator who tells us of when England was young, their king had died and there was no heir left to determine the next ruler. To help solve this problem, God Himself sent down a miracle from on high in the form of the Sword in the Stone. While this intro is nicely animated with book pages kinda like a classic fairy tale story and probably paying homage to the original source material, I think the narrator can get a bit extra when it comes to the singing.
As the sword itself (Excalibur, though they never actually say that in the movie) says:
Naturally, several able bodied young men (because the sword specifically said “king”) try their best to remove the sword, but can’t seem to do it. Since many had tried and failed, more and more people stopped trying entirely eventually leaving the sword to be forgotten. As a result, England falls into the dark ages since they’re left without a king. The strong prey upon the weak as the narrator says (instead of sings) and we soon after zoom in on this:
That aside, when they introduce Merlin (played by Karl Swenson) they get across his character very well. He’s pretty goofy right out of the gate which sets the tone for the film you’re about to watch which is in direct opposition with the song that was sung earlier. At the same time, he’s still respectable, wise, and engaging to watch. Being a wizard, he’s the only character capable of breaking the fourth wall and he does so by responding to the narrator’s comment about the “Dark Ages.” We also learn that he’s capable of seeing into the future and even traveling there if he wants to which sets up the idea of why he would feel the need to help out someone like Arthur later. Eventually we’ll get into more detail about how they handle that, but the biggest thing I can say about Merlin is that he was probably my introduction to the concept of “wizards.” Specifically this Merlin in this movie, and I’m probably not the only one who was introduced to wizards this way.
Think about it, if you had never seen a wizard before and someone showed you this guy, you’d be like “Yeah, that’s a wizard.” Elderly man, long white beard, pointy hat, long pajama-like robes, small glasses, occasionally seen with a pipe, and a wand to use magic with. Not only is he the textbook definition of a wizard, he’s also a really fun character and my personal favorite in the movie (with Archimedes close behind). Especially when it comes to movies that don’t have much of a plot, it’s the characters that keep you invested, and this movie has some pretty good ones that probably have more development than they need to have.
Here we also see the owl Archimedes (played by Junius Matthews) who’s both my second favorite character in the movie and Merlin’s husband. You might think I’m projecting that, but given the way they’re constantly at each other’s throats and still stick together makes it clear that there’s something more keeping them together. Merlin tells Archimedes that someone will be coming to visit them in half an hour and it’ll be Merlin’s job to lead said visitor to their proper place in the world. This is when we first see our protagonist Arthur, or as his foster family calls him: “Wart” (played by I think any and every young boy that just so happened to be walking by the studio).
Okay, so one of the things you’ll notice early on in the movie that can be pretty distracting is Arthur’s voice. You may not be surprised to hear, but three child actors actually voiced him. Shocking, I know. The three actors were Rickie Sorensen, Richard Reitherman, and Robert Reitherman. The reason this was done was because they had initially cast Rickie Sorensen to do the voice of Arthur, but during the film’s three year production, he started to go through puberty and his voice changed. To fix this problem, the director ended up casting his two sons to voice Arthur since their voices sounded similar, but didn’t re-record the lines Rickie Sorensen had previously recorded. Why is that? Well, another thing you’ll probably notice about the movie is that it has a strong low-budget feel. That’s mainly because the film was actually a low-budget production. They didn’t have enough money to go back and re-record those lines, so they just spliced them all together which created that iconic Arthur voice that goes through puberty forwards and backwards four times in the course of 80 minutes.
Not only did they have a limited budget to re-record voice lines, they also didn’t have a high enough budget to create unique animations for the characters a lot of the time. Which is just as well, because if you’re paying attention while watching there are several instances where animation gets repeated and even soundbites get repeated. I think there are at least a good six times they have Arthur exclaim “Whoa, wha- Oh!” in the exact same fashion. Heck, the entire rest of this review could just be me going over what all is repeated in this movie, but the good news is that while the animation and soundbites may be repeated, the situations and lessons are not which any good story should aim for.
Soon after, we’re also introduced to Arthur’s jerky foster brother Kay (played by Norman Alden) who’s always animated like he’s an American doing a bad British accent. Believe me, once you see that you can never un-see it. He’s just outside Merlin and Archimedes’ forest doing a bit of hunting until Arthur messes him up. On the plus side, at least Arthur saved Bambi’s mom! Kay gets mad at him, but Arthur tries to make it up to him by promising to go into the woods himself and recover Kay’s lost arrow. It’s here we’re also introduced to this one wolf that’ll be a recurring character from here on.
To add more comedy into the story they throw in this wolf that tries to chase and eat Arthur but can never seem to get him. Usually this results in ridiculous slapstick-y moments that can get some genuine giggles out of me. You could cut these out and not miss anything, but I think it gives the movie a bit more personality. Eventually Arthur comes across the arrow but falls through Merlin’s roof in the process just like Merlin had predicted earlier. They start to get to know each other and I especially like this line:
After a bit more goofiness with a sugar bowl that has a surprising amount of personality, Arthur has to leave so he can get back to the castle and do his work which gives us our first song, “Higgitus Figgitus,” as Merlin packs up his entire house so he can move into the castle with Arthur and teach him there. Of course I won’t be the first to point out that the songs in this movie, which aren’t so much sung as opposed to read, are still cute and hummable. I can’t tell you how many times this song in particular has randomly got stuck in my head over the years which also shouldn’t be surprising coming from the Sherman Brothers. Archimedes, Arthur, and Merlin pack up and I think now might also be a good time to mention that while the humor is often lowkey and giggle-worthy, the filmmakers probably do the Merlin beard gag a few too many times. Granted I know this film is still intended for kids, it’s just that there’s only so many times you can do one joke before it gets old. Although, if you do have kids they’ll probably still laugh at them. I know I did at that age.
We get some more repeated animation and more wolf slapstick until Merlin realizes he’s leading Arthur in the wrong direction and they turn around. Again, this is probably something they could’ve cut out since it’s not particularly necessary, but not only does it play into Merlin’s character as being a bit absent-minded and somewhat senile, but the movie also has an interesting slice-of-life kind of feel to it. Sure scenes like this can drag things out, and I’m not gonna lie that can make things feel a bit more boring, but the movie is only 80 minutes already and if you prefer to watch for the sake of seeing these characters’ interactions, then I’m sure you won’t mind too much. For me, just seeing these characters talk with each other is fun and engaging on its own.
Back at the castle we’re introduced to Kay’s father Sir Ector (played by Sebastian Cabot) whom the movie could’ve easily turned into a villain. However, they don’t really do that. Of course he’s still a strict guy, but he’s not a straight up bad guy either. He’s got a big place to look after and he doesn’t really know what to do with Arthur so he just has him do chores all the time while putting most of his time into his biological son which he thinks has more promise. Now Ector does still call Arthur “Wart” which is pretty douchey, but I think at his core he’s just an overworked dude who’s at a loss for help. We’ll get a clearer picture of this by the end of the movie, but that’s what it’s like for now.
Arthur gets back and Ector is naturally not happy with him running off into the forest by himself. He gives him 4 demerits and tells him to report for his kitchen duties with Merlin and Archimedes watching everything close behind. Merlin gives Ector a demonstration of his abilities which Kay couldn’t care less about.
However, as soon as Merlin lets Ector know that his plan is to give Arthur an education, Ector isn’t pleased. If Merlin’s going to mess with Ector’s sla- I mean helper, then Merlin’s gonna have to go! Merlin ends up convincing Ector through more magical means though and Ector gives him the best room in the house as consolation.
Naturally there’s a storm later that night and in the midst of trying to de-wet their chambers, Merlin and Archimedes hear a visitor outside the gates screaming about big news from London. Merlin wants to know what the news is that was so important it resulted in shaking his Leaning Tower of Pisa so he sends Archimedes down to eavesdrop. It’s here we see that the messenger Pellinore (played by Alan Napier [yes, Alfred from the Adam West Batman Show]) tell Ector and the still awake Kay that they’re holding a jousting tournament in London on New Year’s Day and the winner will become the King of England. Great news! Still, couldn’t it have waited until morning?
So now the task for Ector is to train Kay up to become a knight so he can be in the tournament and hopefully become the king. He also picks Arthur to be Kay’s squire. With this knowledge in tow, Archimedes makes his way back up to the tower to let Merlin know. One thing I never quite understood though is that while Archimedes is flying up to the tower, the orchestra plays this really suspenseful tune. Why? What’s so tense about this moment? I guess there’s a bit of tension knowing that whoever wins the tournament will be crowned king whether it’s Kay or not, especially since historically Arthur is supposed to become king, but it still seems like a bit of an odd choice to me.
Bright and early the next morning, Ector, Kay, and Arthur are all getting into the spirit of jousting much to Merlin’s dismay when Kay goes flying into his tower which causes it to shake him awake. What’s kinda funny about this moment is that Merlin can hardly remember what’s going on. He asks Archimedes where they are, doesn’t remember coming to the castle, and can hardly remember Arthur until Ector wakes him up with his yelling. Dammit Kay, why can’t you just hold on to the reins?! I love in this moment how both Kay and the horse have matching black eyes after the crash.
While Pellinore tells Kay that jousting is a highly developed science, Merlin couldn’t disagree more. This is what leads into him highlighting what Arthur is doing the whole time. Sure his role is small, but he takes pride in what he does and it’s Merlin here that mentions that he could be great if only given the opportunity to direct his work towards something more meaningful. Honestly, this is probably my favorite part of the movie. There have been several different movies that have this kind of “Chosen One” plot that just gets old and tired, but this movie puts an interesting spin on it. Merlin being the character he is with the ability to see into the future knows that Arthur will eventually grow up to become the greatest king known to England (after all, that’s why he made the decision to teach him in the first place), but he never tells Arthur he will be something great, he only tells Arthur he could be something great.
Merlin, and by extension the filmmakers, treat Arthur like any regular person that has potential even knowing that eventually he’ll become anything but a regular person. Ultimately it makes the movie feel more realistic and personal while keeping the message focused and that’s what I like the most. In the end it’s your actions that determine your worthiness, not some prophecy or whatever. This is what leads us to our first animal adventure when Merlin brings Arthur away to the moat and turns him into a fish to teach him about instinct, survival of the fittest, and nature in general.
Another great detail is that no matter what form any of these characters are in, you can always tell which of them is which. Even if you saw this film in black-and-white, their designs are perfectly modeled after their characters too which makes it easier. We also get our next song “That’s What Makes the World Go Round” which also gets stuck in my head way more often than I’d care to admit and we get this small little scene right here:
To me, this scene perfectly encapsulates the whole vibe of this movie. It kinda just has this feeling of “Sure, why not?” This movie is very content and quaint in its existence and I’m perfectly fine with that. Because again, that scene could’ve easily been left on the cutting room floor, but here it is. Sure, why not? Soon after this bit of randomness, we get a look at our antagonist for the water element, this giant pike:
Through a series of clever moves, Arthur manages to outsmart the pike and escape with his life giving birth to images like this:
In the end though, it’s Archimedes who manages to save the day. He was specifically kept out of the water and close by where Merlin and Arthur went in so he could help in case something went wrong despite how much he denies it. So he picks up fish Arthur and brings him back to the surface until Merlin makes his way out of the water in his human form and turns Arthur back to normal shortly after. One thing I’d also like to highlight is how the magic words to deactivate spells are also specific to Merlin and Arthur. Whenever Merlin deactivates a spell he used on himself he says the magic word “Alakazam,” but whenever he deactivates a spell he used on Arthur he says “Snick Snack Snorrel.” A tiny detail, but still kinda cool.
Since the whole time Arthur was supposed to be helping with Kay’s training, when he returns Ector gives him 6 demerits (3 for being late, and 3 for the fish story he told them) and banishes him to the kitchen for dish duty. In the midst of his work, Merlin interrupts with a proposition to try out being a squirrel. Arthur declines at first, not because he’s worried about how dangerous it could be, but that he wants to finish his work. The small details really do add up in this movie. Once again he has pride in his work even if he doesn’t like it which speaks to how noble he is. Merlin ends up putting a spell on the kitchen to do the work for him, while also giving us a reprisal of “Higgitus Figgitus,” saying “Who cares so long as the work gets done?” Honestly though, fair. Also, how did they expect Arthur to be able to do all these friggin’ dishes?!
Once they’ve become squirrels, it seems the main lesson Merlin wants to get across are unseen forces on Earth. The first one is gravity: the concept that two objects or particles, if free to move, will be accelerated toward each other. Then we meet this character who is so funny!
Being a squirrel she doesn’t talk (though her chittering is played by Ginny Tyler) and like I said, she’s frickin’ hilarious. As soon as she sets eyes on Arthur, she instantly falls in love with him and does everything in her power to get with him. You know what I mean. Every step of the way, no matter how much Arthur protests, she never gets the message and constantly chases him. That and her chittering is so ridiculous, cute, and funny at the same time I wish that I could’ve seen Ginny Tyler record for this movie. If only. Anyway, Merlin’s third song “A Most Befuddling Thing” is pretty good too while also describing the concept of love to Arthur and the audience.
During this whole sequence we also get a few more instances of the wolf from earlier trying to eat Arthur squirrel and cutesy squirrel until cutesy squirrel ends up putting an end to his shenanigans by defying the laws of physics (I’m not going to break it down, this is both animated and a story about magic). That and Merlin picks up an admirer of his own as well.
Honestly though, she’s just as funny as cutesy squirrel is with the same amount of incoherent chittering that almost sounds like English, and complete lack of understanding body language. It can’t last forever though, because both Merlin and Arthur change back into humans. This results in two different reactions from our potential squirrel wives. One of them humorous:
And the other one surprisingly dramatic:
I never really understood what the idea behind this was supposed to be. Don’t get me wrong, given how attached I’ve become to this squirrel I don’t want to see her sad like this, but why is she sad? Can’t she just find a different mate? Maybe its meant to get across how love is complicated much like Merlin’s song from earlier indicated which wouldn’t surprise me, I’m just a bit confused about how that kind of love would apply to a squirrel. I might be over-analyzing it (it wouldn’t be the first time), but the thing that I like the most about the way this moment is structured is how it comes back around full circle. At the beginning of this lesson Merlin was discussing unseen forces like gravity, but now at the end we’re touching on love which is another unseen powerful force on Earth. Much like gravity, love pushes and pulls you around in ways you can’t even see, which might be what the point is. Then again, this final image always makes me sad:
In the castle, one of the scullery maids (played by Barbara Jo Allen) finds the kitchen under Merlin’s spell and gets Ector and Kay to help her handle it. Naturally this calls for more slapstick to offset the sadness of the last scene.
Merlin and Arthur enter soon after and Merlin deactivates the spell. Ector gives Merlin a piece of his mind, but Arthur defends him until Ector decides to make Hobbs Kay’s squire instead of Arthur. That’ll show him! Who’s Hobbs? Yeah we never see Hobbs, we never even hear him. Again, low-budget. Now Arthur is at his lowest point. Really? This is his lowest point? Well, he’s been stripped of his squire duties, the kitchen’s a wreck now, and he’s back to being nobody. Given the fact that they mentioned earlier how Arthur is an orphan, Medieval England wouldn’t like that at all. He has no social standing, no prospects, no nothing. The only thing he had going for him was being Kay’s squire because that’s the only thing society said he was cut out for. Now he doesn’t even have that. So yeah, this would be his lowest point. Merlin does his best to apologize and tries to make it up to Arthur by mentioning to him that since this is his lowest point he can only go up from here. So they decide the next day they’ll go further into Arthur’s education.
On this day, Merlin starts his education by mentioning several things that mankind has yet to discover historically and Archimedes properly calls him out on that. While I do believe people should have the correct information, in this day and age that the movie is set, Archimedes correctly points out that if Arthur starts spouting facts that humans will discover hundreds of years later, everyone’ll think he’s crazy. You can’t learn history in reverse. Merlin, frustrated, gives up and hands over teaching duties to Archimedes which is when he finds out Arthur can’t read or write. This really is medieval times.
While Archimedes tries to teach Arthur the ABC’s, he gets frustrated with Arthur way too easily when he copies the “G” incorrectly. Merlin then takes the opportunity to demonstrate the capabilities of his model plane which turns out to be…
Then Archimedes has one of the most contagious laughs I’ve ever heard before.
All this fun and excitement gets Arthur thinking about flying if he were a bird. So then Merlin changes him into a bird and tries to teach him the mechanics of flight until Archimedes (again, rightfully so) butts in and calls him out for claiming to know more about flying than the literal bird. Take a look at the looks they give each other here and then try telling me they’re not married.
So Archimedes takes Arthur out on his first flying session, and it takes him a second to get the hang of it, but as soon as he does he starts making the real bird look bad. All this is eventually cut short when they notice the presence of a hawk flying above them. Another thing I like about each of these transformation sequences is that each of them has some form of predator that hunts the characters. I think in the end it gets across the idea that there’s always going to be someone out there who’s stronger than you, but you have the ability to outsmart them if you can. This chase eventually ends with Arthur falling down a chimney and us getting introduced to the closest thing this movie has to a villain: Madam Mim (played by Martha Wentworth).
While not technically a villain, she does still relish mayhem, cruelty, and decay like any other villain would. However she’s not a plotter, heck she just sits around and plays solitaire all day, she’s closer to everyone’s annoying neighbor if they were literally born in Hell. Most of her tricks and schemes just involve cheating, but we’ll get more into that soon. She also gives us the (not) villain song “The Marvelous Mad Madame Mim” and this nightmare fuel:
Why is it so much creepier seeing her as a hot woman than with a pig face? By the way, here’s some eye bleach:
It’s all fun and games however until Arthur admits that he thinks Merlin is a better spell-crafter than her since he uses his magic for good things. This causes Mim to lash out at Arthur and try to destroy him by turning herself into a cat. Get it, because Arthur’s a bird right now. Eventually she catches him, but before she can do the deed, Merlin bursts in demanding answers. On account of Mim trying to destroy Arthur, Merlin agrees to have a Wizard’s Duel with her which is my favorite sequence in the movie, and I’m sure I’m not the only one.
I mean it’s just so much fun! Both Mim and Merlin take turns changing into various animals (another fun detail, Mim always transforms into the animal that eats whatever animal Merlin is) which showcases some really fluid and creative animation. I really can’t do this sequence justice with images, you’ll have to watch the movie. Not only is it fun, it’s also funny with how Mim’s first move is just to cheat and they engage in plenty more creative slapstick. It’s also interesting to see all the clever choices Merlin has to make in order to counteract Mim’s spontaneity and ruthlessness which eventually culminates in Mim cheating again by turning into a dragon, but Merlin seals the deal with a very clever loophole. In the beginning, Mim said only animal transformations were allowed, and Merlin ends up turning himself into a germ. Since germs are technically animals he manages to get Mim to catch him which results in him winning.
The illness doesn’t kill her, but it definitely leaves her down and out, so our group ends up leaving in triumph and Arthur promises to stick to his schooling so he can make something of himself.
Back in the castle around Christmas time, Kay has officially been knighted and Hobbs came down with the mumps. Who? Oh right, the kid that replaced Arthur as Kay’s squire. Since this is medieval times and we never see Hobbs, I’m just going to assume he died. Kay needs another squire, and the only person who can fill that spot is Arthur, so he becomes Kay’s squire once again. He rushes to Merlin’s tower to tell him the good news, but Merlin doesn’t seem too pleased with this.
As you may remember two paragraphs ago, Arthur promised to keep to his schooling, but now he’s become a squire. At first I was kinda confused as to why Merlin would be mad at Arthur even though he knows Arthur will eventually become King Arthur, but I thought about it and it makes perfect sense now. Sure Merlin has seen the future, but it’s never set in stone, and each individual makes their own future, so that’s why Merlin’s pissed. However, this is followed by the most random exit I’ve ever seen a character have. Merlin in his rage just randomly shouts “Blow me to Bermuda!” and his magic does just that. He suddenly rockets out of the tower and to Bermuda. What? In a way it’s kinda funny with just how random it is, especially since we’ll also see him again in less than 10 minutes of screen time anyway, but it also begs the question: why do it at all? Was it just for the sake of that joke? I mean if I laugh at it does that make it worth it? Sure, why not?
So now at the New Year’s Day Tournament, Kay is preparing for his match when Arthur suddenly realizes he forgot Kay’s sword. He tells Kay which predictably results in Kay lashing out at him and Arthur goes back to the inn to retrieve it. While there, Archimedes (who’s still with Arthur) notices a sword in a churchyard. Wouldn’t you know it, it’s the titular sword itself! One thing that kinda bugs me is that the narrator in the beginning of the movie explained that the sword was forgotten, but here it is just sitting in a churchyard no more than 5 meters away from civilization. Maybe what the narrator meant wasn’t that the sword was entirely forgotten, but people just straight up stopped caring. Either way, they could’ve worded that better.
Arthur goes right up to the sword and tries pulling it out when some heavenly light glows down upon it.
Naturally Arthur pulls it out and takes it back to Kay where he’s like “Wait a minute, this isn’t my sword.” Ector then takes a look at it and identifies it as the Sword in the Stone by the inscription which results in an uproar around the tournament as everyone is told that someone pulled the Sword from the Stone. However, no one believes Arthur that he pulled it out, you know since he’s a kid, so they force him to go back to the Stone to prove it. What’s funny to me about this is that Ector just slides the Sword back into the Stone so they can have their redo. This is the same miracle sword, right? You can just do that? At first, Arthur steps up to do it again, but Kay jumps in because he thinks after it’s been pulled already anyone else can pull it out. He couldn’t be more wrong.
This also encourages every other person in the tournament crowd to start clamoring for the sword and trying to pull it out themselves, but Pellinore actually chimes in and lets Arthur have his turn. Despite what it may seem at first, Pellinore is surprisingly a nice guy. So Arthur goes up to the sword and pulls it out for everyone to see. It’s at this point the crowd starts hailing him as the king and Ector and Kay have a solemn moment. Ector kneels down and asks for forgiveness from Arthur, to which Arthur is speechless. Kay needs a bit more convincing, but after Ector tells him to bow, he does just that. Right when you think there’s no redemption for him either, he makes a face at Arthur that says it all:
So Arthur is crowned king, but he feels completely out of his depth. He tries to run away with the help of Archimedes, but to no avail since every citizen of London it seems is outside the castle hailing Arthur. It’s right here that Merlin makes his return and solidifies his gayness.
Upon Merlin’s return, Arthur feels much more secure in his new position, and we end this film with Merlin and Arthur continuously adjusting Arthur’s crown. Then it stops. Yeah, to be real I’d be more surprised if a movie like this didn’t end like that, but it is still a bit abrupt. On the whole though, I still enjoy this movie.
So, what can I say about this movie? If I’m being honest, I feel like there’s so much to say yet nothing to say at the same time. It’s strange to describe, but something you can definitely feel confident saying is that this is a movie that sticks with you. Outside of that, there are still some things I’d like to point out. Of course I already mentioned some of the minor details and whatnot that I didn’t quite get in the film, but the thing I feel most inclined to mention is the pacing. Like I said earlier, it has a strong slice-of-life type of feel to the point where it seems plotless much of the time. To some viewers, I can totally understand them not getting into this movie or even thinking it’s boring. In fact, when I first saw this movie with my family at home, I left in the middle to use the bathroom and when I came back I asked them “What’d I miss?” They said “Not much.” That right there perfectly sums up the film to me.
It’s either you get into the unique take on the Arthur legend with the fun characters, songs, and animation, or you spend the whole movie thinking “When is something gonna happen?!” While it can be meandering and random at times, it still has charm, fun, and character to it that makes me glad I saw it. At the end of the day, that’s more what I mean when I say that this movie is underrated. Underneath a layer of slow moving scenes you find so many more interesting layers you can’t find in any other Disney film. That’s what keeps me coming back to this movie so many years later. If you’re the type of person that likes that sort of stuff, by all means grab your magic TV wands and take a look at this underappreciated Disney classic this weekend movie night. If not, then…at least you made it through this review! Thanks! Have a great week!
I would personally rate this movie a 4/5 squirrels. While I do still stand by what I said about this movie being underrated, I never said I believed this movie was the best Disney classic. That and I think the slow-moving moments have the potential to turn a lot of people away. If I’m being honest, as much as I like this movie, even I have to be in the right mood sometimes to enjoy it.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I’m just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Pan’s Labyrinth
Been a minute since I did an R-rated film, but here it is. This is the movie that put Guillermo del Toro on the map as a magical realist genius: Pan’s Labyrinth!
Disclaimer:
The movie I’ll be reviewing this week is rated: R
This review contains adult content, swearing, and of course: Spoilers!
Definitely a divergence of style from some of the films I’ve been looking at lately, but still one I always kinda liked: Pan’s Labyrinth! Honestly, I’ve only ever seen this movie once, and that was also years ago, so I can’t say a whole lot in this intro being as I don’t remember a whole lot from it either. Of course the biggest things that always stood out to me was it’s sense of discovery and creative/ambitious creature effects which are instantly iconic in horror media. So iconic to the point where everyone feels the need to reference them at some point or another. Legit, these creature designs appear in many different places from other horror fare to comedic parodies of the original source material. We’ll get more into that later, but one thing that I always have the hardest time remembering is the story.
Yeah, despite this being an easily referenced film, I can’t for the life of me remember how the story goes. I have a vague recollection of it having something to do with a war, soldiers, fighting, and a young girl coping with the absence of her father by escaping to a fantasy world, but that’s about it. To be fair to the movie, I may just not have been paying attention that well the first time I saw it. The details are definitely a blur to me though, and as you may have guessed, I’m writing this before I’ve re-watched the movie so you can get my most honest feelings on remembering the film before I give you an accurate breakdown. I feel like I should also come clean and tell y’all that the reason I decided to cover this movie this week is because today is my Mapa’s Birthday and they told me that of the movies we have in our DVD library, this is one of their favorites. In honor of one of my parents, let’s dive in.
I would put jokes and references here, but I don’t want to come across as ignorant (at least any more ignorant than I already have), so I’ll just say: “Here’s Pan’s Labyrinth!”
Oh, I should also point out before we officially get started that since this movie was originally filmed in Spanish and even the original title is El Laberinto del Fauno, expect a lot of subtitles in the images I find. I could’ve gotten a dubbed version in English to review, but if I’ve learned nothing else from anime, it’s that subs are almost always better than dubs. Also, I feel like it would make things a bit more complicated to review a dubbed version of a live-action film since I would have to contrast the physical acting of the original cast with the English voice overs and it would just be too annoying for me. If some other time y’all would like me to compare the original subbed and English dubbed versions of the film I’d definitely be down for that, just shoot me an email and I’ll make it happen (you can do so on the Contact page of this website), but this review will be the original Spanish subbed.
Literally the first shot of the film is a dying child…cool. While this is probably jarring to most viewers (me included), I will say that it does set the tone for the film immediately. Throughout the entire rest of the movie’s runtime, it carries with it a harsh and melancholic tone that totally justifies this opening shot. For real, all of the characters in this movie go through some tough things so you can’t say the movie didn’t prepare you for that going in. Not only that, but it really does make you want to see these characters happy just so someone can friggin’ smile which creates more complexity and layers for the ending, but of course we’ll get to that later. Also, the background music for the scene is a lullaby that we’ll see circulate throughout the rest of the movie as well which is pretty clever.
For now though, we’re given a brief bout of exposition where a narrator describes to us a simple fable. It tells us of a princess from long ago who lived in a prosperous Underground Realm free from the troubles of mortals until she wanted to see the surface (I really can’t seem to escape Disney right now, can I?). Once she went above ground, the brightness of the sun blinded her causing her to lose all her memories while the surface also made her mortal until she grew sick and eventually died. Her father, the king, believed that her soul would eventually return, possibly in another body, and he would wait for her until the end of time. You know, being immortal and all that. Right after all this, we’re introduced to our main character in a car with her mother in Spain, 1944 named Ofelia (played by Ivana Baquero) whom we previously saw lying on the ground dying. Knowing that information right out the gate kinda makes me want to see this happen though:
If only this were a dark comedy. Anyway, I really like how this fairy tale is essentially the baseline for the entire film and it comes back into play in several interesting and visual ways throughout the movie. At its core, this film is a fairy tale intended for an adult audience complete with graphic violence, the rawest evil of humanity, and disturbing imagery, and it reminds you of that every step of the way.
In the car with our main character, we’re also introduced to her mother Carmen (played by Ariadna Gil) and we’re given some preliminary character and plot development with Ofelia and how she has a propensity for fairy tales and fantasy, Carmen is currently with child and going through a difficult pregnancy, and they’re in the process of traveling to an outpost where Ofelia’s step-father is commanding Spanish soldiers after the Spanish Civil War to hunt down and kill what remains of the Rebellion. After Carmen feels the need to puke, they stop the car briefly and Ofelia is introduced to a small insect friend. She feels the need to refer to this friend as a fairy, however, Carmen calls Ofelia back to the car and we officially meet Ofelia’s step-father Captain Vidal (played by Sergi López) at the outpost who’s quite possibly one of the worst human beings on the planet.
I think the main point behind this character was to have him represent the worst of humanity in general. Sure the entire time he thinks he’s the one doing right, he’s merely clearing the way for a new “Free Spain,” but he’s not afraid to hurt every person he comes into contact with along the way in order to achieve it. Also, most fairy tales have an exaggerated character such as this one in order to make their message clearer, much like with Disney’s version of Claude Frollo from The Hunchback of Notre Dame. That film makes it clear from the outset that it’s a story about a man and a monster and we eventually find out by the end that Quasimodo is the man and Frollo is the monster even though their appearances would suggest the opposite. Don’t get me wrong though, Sergi López does such a good job playing this character that I would legit need someone to restrain me from punching him square in the face if I ever met him in real life. You will hate him by the end of the movie.
In these moments, we’re also briefly introduced to Vidal’s personal assistant Mercedes (played by Maribel Verdú) and the on-site medical professional Dr. Ferreiro (played by Álex Angulo). Of course they’ll become more important later in the film, but for now they’re just kinda there. I think I prefer this a bit more than if it was made obvious from the start that they would eventually become major players in the story. There are a lot of moments like this that treat the progression of everything in a casual sense which I really enjoy because it makes the fantastical moments that we see later seem more real, especially when Ofelia sees the fairy again and is shown the location of el Laberinto del Fauno. We also get a sense for the reckless and childlike behavior that Ofelia will continue to exhibit in later scenes when she drops her books and hat in favor of chasing a bug, much to mine and the audience’s annoyance, but that’s later. In the end she’s still a kid, but that won’t stop me from pointing out when she does something estúpido.
Later that night we see the good doctor give Carmen some medicine, Ofelia eavesdrops on Dr. Ferreiro and Mercedes having a conversation about how they’re going to help the guerilla rebels in the surrounding forest which ups the tension, and Ofelia tells her unborn brother a story to calm him before bed. Much like I said before, a lot of these scenes have a casual feel to them and are allowed to just be little moments especially when Ofelia is cuddling up to Carmen as you would expect a mother and daughter at that age to do. Also, the story Ofelia tells to her brother is the perfect thesis for the whole movie.
She tells a story of a rose which blooms every night at sunset at the top of a mountain that would grant whoever plucked it the gift of immortality. The only caveat is that the surrounding mountain was covered in poisonous thorns which scared any potential immortals away, so no one dared to go near it. As a result, the rose was forgotten and no one on Earth was granted its wonderful gift. You see, on the commentary track for the film, the director Guillermo del Toro explained his concept of immortality. In his eyes, someone who is “immortal” is someone who doesn’t care for the consequences of death. So by climbing that mountain regardless of the potential danger to your life, you are immortal to him. Naturally, this concept is spotlighted very obviously once you make it to the end of the film knowing this information, but for now we’ll leave it a mystery. Also if you’re reading this review before watching the film, I’d recommend turning back now. Reading these reviews are not a substitute for actually watching a movie, I hope you know that, and this is definitely one I’d recommend.
Meanwhile, Captain Vidal is called to deal with two people who were caught nearby the outpost. They claim to be father and son, farmers who were just out hunting wabbits in the area, but Captain Vidal doesn’t like their tone. Especially the son’s, whom he brutalizes with a bottle before shooting both of them dead. This scene is easily the most graphically violent in the movie and as the film progresses the violence only gets more and more downplayed to emphasize how meaningless the soldiers’ fight really is. Also, this scene was based on an oral account of a true event that happened shortly after the Spanish Civil War where a fascist soldier ended up killing two innocent civilians, one by bashing their nose in with the butt of his gun. I say this because in the movie, of course the Captain only searches the rest of the farmers’ belongings after he killed them to see that they were in fact telling the truth, making their deaths that much more cruel and meaningless much like the real life heartless killings. I won’t give you a .gif of that because I cringe up whenever I see it myself, you’ll just have to watch the movie to see it in all its bloody glory.
Back with Ofelia, expect a lot of this back and forth from here on. Most of the movie is cutting (or more accurately: wiping) from the side story involving the real world to the main magical story involving Ofelia and back again. Despite a lot of touch-and-go story telling like this, it still manages to balance it’s stories well and it doesn’t feel cluttered at all. Each of the characters have enough time to breathe and develop and most of what’s happening on screen is mirrored in both stories to keep things more focused while also playing up the aspect of the magical world possibly not being real and instead just in Ofelia’s imagination. Speaking of the story, Ofelia gets another visit in the night from the fairy who, I’ll just say, has a very progressive look compared to most other fairies I’ve seen. That’s right, fairies can look like insects movie, tell the world!
Yeah we’re just gonna immediately conform to fairy stereotypes before leading Ofelia into the labyrinth’s center for the first time. Jokes aside, it is still a pretty neat design that’s clearly born from nature and the transformation sequence from insect to fairy is pretty cool too. We then meet the Faun for the first time (played by Doug Jones, but voiced by Pablo Adán) where he looks decrepit and worn with moss growing all over him and his teeth all dirty.
This is probably also the best time just to discuss the Faun in general. One thing you may not notice upon your first viewing of the film is that the more the Faun appears throughout the movie the younger he seems to get where his hair becomes more colorful and vibrant, the wrinkles on his face disappear, his teeth become clean and straight, the moss on his body vanishes, and he loses the twitchy movements he began the film with. This is done to represent how Ofelia finding him, interacting with him, and doing his trials is giving him energy since he was left to wither while she wasn’t around which further drives home the idea that Ofelia is the reincarnation of the lost princess of the Underground Realm. So many moments like this are sprinkled throughout the movie including the image of the Faun’s head appearing in multiple places, the most obvious being the entrance to the labyrinth, but also on the banisters inside the mill, and in the shape of the tree Ofelia finds the toad living under. I really enjoy when a film tells its story more through visual means as opposed to verbal means.
Something you also probably noticed is how the Faun is played by Doug Jones like I mentioned previously, but his voice was dubbed by Pablo Adán. You can tell that this was mostly done to make the Faun’s voice more creepy and make it seem like you may not always be able to trust him because in traditional folklore, fauns are actually neutral creatures. They’re meant to represent the Earth and nature as a whole which ebbs and flows in whatever direction it wants which we also see in the Faun’s actions throughout the film. When we look at Doug Jones’ performance as the Faun as well, his work was not easy at all. Not only did he have to act underneath all that make-up, but he also had to read his lines in a language he didn’t speak (although he did put in the work to learn them) which was also an archaic version of said language to emphasize the Faun’s age, and he needed to act alongside Ivana Baquero while having practically no way of hearing her. As it turns out, the headpiece Doug Jones had to wear as the Faun restricted his hearing so much that he had to strain to hear his co-star while acting with her and make it seem like his responses were believable and conversational. All that being said, you wouldn’t be able to tell all of that by watching this which speaks to Doug Jones’ talent.
While we’re on the subject of difficulty for the actors, Doug Jones was not the only one who had challenges to overcome on set. For example: Sergi López was faced with the task of hitting specific physical beats for his character often while waiting for the camera to get into a specific position while still making his actions seem deliberate and natural which was much different from what he was used to when it comes to acting. This is also something you’ll notice when watching the film is that in pretty much every shot, the camera is never entirely stationary. It’s always moving at least slightly, not in a Blair Witch disorienting kind of way exactly, but at least to the point where if you’re paying close attention it’s almost like you can feel the cam-op breathing. I’m still not entirely sure what the intended purpose behind this decision was, but it does give the film a sense of life that not many other movies have.
Anyway, I’m pretty sure you came here to hear me give a review, so let’s get back to that.
The Faun ends up giving Ofelia what he calls the “Book of Crossroads” which will tell her the path she’s supposed to take in the trials (only if she opens it when she’s by herself though). We also get more reasons to hate Vidal because we then see him shaving in his private quarters while listening to a vinyl record. I don’t care what anyone says, whenever I see some asshole in movies casually listening to a vinyl record by themselves, I immediately hate them. It definitely doesn’t help because I know I have my own personal collection of vinyl records, but whenever I see this in movies, it’s usually intended to get across how annoyingly pompous and arrogant a character is which just makes me hate them with a passion.
We see here how Vidal is overly obsessed with small details, such as the hair on his face, how shiny his boots are, and earlier with how his watch is working. He’s a complete control freak who needs everything to bend to his will, which also explains why he wouldn’t be able to notice how people like Dr. Ferreiro and Mercedes have been working against him for so long. Speaking of Mercedes, she gives us a brief shot of her working in the kitchen and setting up Chekhov’s Knife for later in the movie until she goes upstairs to help set up Ofelia’s bath. Carmen got her a nice new dress to impress everyone at the dinner party that’s happening later that night, but Ofelia seems more interested in the book she just got which is totally fair. If I got visited by a faun and was told that I was the reincarnation of a magical princess I wouldn’t care about some stupid dinner party either.
Back with Vidal and Mercedes, the mill only just got a stockpile of goods to store in their storeroom because Vidal wants to lure the guerilla rebels in the surrounding forest to him for supplies. Mercedes gives the key to the room to Vidal and tells him that it’s the only copy which is a total lie and I’ll just take this opportunity to say that Mercedes is awesome (this’ll become clearer later). This is also where we start to see some similarities between what’s happening in reality and what’s happening in Ofelia’s fantasy world. As Vidal and the rest of his soldiers set out to investigate a pillar of smoke in the distant forest, Ofelia sets out on her first trial to retrieve a key from the belly of a toad living under a dying tree. The reason the tree is dying is because the toad is sapping the life from it from underneath, and you could make the argument that Vidal and his soldiers are doing a similar thing themselves. By hunting down the rebels in the forest (something they definitely didn’t need to do since the war is over), they’re destroying the environment in the process by turning it into an unnecessary battleground. That and the visuals support this idea by quickly transitioning back and forth between both stories by utilizing vertical wipes as if the screen were a page in a book while Ofelia reads the instructions for her first task.
Meanwhile with Vidal, he and his team of soldiers discover an abandoned rebel camp with the same parcel Dr. Ferreiro gave Mercedes lying next to the campfire with a vial of antibiótico (that’s antibiotics) still inside of it and a lottery ticket not far away. Vidal takes this opportunity to threaten any rebels who may be listening by screaming into the forest like a jackass, though with him it’s not hard to look like a jackass. Ofelia on the other hand removed her nice dress her mother got for her to enter the hole in the tree and confront the toad by forcing it to swallow three stones in order to puke up the key she needs for the Faun. I should probably also mention that the CG doesn’t always blend the greatest in the movie. You can see a pretty good example of this with the toad and Ofelia at the bottom of the tree together. Sure the basis for the toad was a puppet that they actually constructed on set, but what I mean is that they gave it CG touch-ups that are pretty obvious to spot while watching. Not to say that the visuals still aren’t creative though especially after the toad literally pukes its guts out even if it doesn’t look entirely real. Unfortunately Ofelia gets covered in mud, bugs, and crap during this whole ordeal, which ruins her shoes and eventually she comes out from under the tree to discover that her dress also got ruined after getting blown off the branch she hung it up on. The Ranger’s not gonna like that, Yogi. She stumbles back to the mill while everyone else has their dinner party without her.
If you pay close attention, you’ll notice that this scene is later paralleled in the Pale Man sequence that Ofelia has later with a long dining table full of food, a faceless monster at the head, and a square shaped fireplace behind it. This is in part to show similarities between the fantasy world and the real one and give a sense of validation to the fantasy world making it seem even more real. At the table, Vidal reveals more of his assholetry by talking about how he wants to be here hunting down rebels because he feels as if it’s his right to do so while also insulting Carmen for telling the story of how they met, and denying the existence of his father’s watch establishing a deeper connection to it. What I like about this is how we constantly see Vidal checking his watch throughout the movie making it clear how much he cares about it and how much it means to him. Eventually Ofelia makes it home with the help of Mercedes, since she was fresh off sending signals to the rebels, and Carmen is not happy about what she did to her dress.
So Ofelia gets sent to bed without supper for these transgressions, and here we also catch a bit of a glimpse of her past when Carmen asks her if she’s ever going to learn to behave. We get the sense from here that disobeying is just something that comes naturally to Ofelia, that she’s a person more inclined to trust herself than anyone else. This’ll eventually lead to some dumb moments on her part, but it also has a few perks too as we’ll see later. When Carmen says she disrespected Vidal though, Ofelia doesn’t care one bit as we see with this pretty funny shot of her smirking like a little shit.
Not long after, she gets lead by the fairy to deliver the key to the Faun only for him to tell her that she’s going to need it herself for the upcoming task. Well wasn’t that helpful?! The next morning, the soldiers start handing out supplies to the families that were present at the dinner party the previous night while Ofelia takes another look in her book (Reading Rainbow!). It starts to have its time of the month though which also doubles as Faun head imagery only to reveal that in the other room Carmen had an…accident.
I think the thing I like the most about the fantastical elements of this story is that you could reasonably explain them away logically. While that wasn’t the director’s intent when making this film, you could still watch the movie that way, and I especially enjoy ambiguous stories that allow the audience to draw their own conclusions. We’ll see more of that in the film later on, but for now you could assume that Ofelia just got a bad feeling being away from her mother after seeing her sweating heavily while sleeping not long before getting out of bed with her and also hearing her moaning in pain from the next room over as opposed to getting a vision from a book. Of course Ofelia calls in Vidal for help who calls in Dr. Ferreiro who instructs the Captain that Carmen needs to be kept on constant bed rest while Ofelia gets moved to another room to give Carmen space to recover. It’s here that Ofelia also gets some alone time with Mercedes as she’s moving rooms and she admits that she knows Mercedes is working with the rebels after having seen her private conversation with Dr. Ferreiro and Mercedes signalling the rebels. Since Ofelia likes Mercedes though, she promises not to tell anyone. They’re like this the two of them: BFFs, Twinkies, peas in a pod, people who need to rely on each other to survive a sociopathic captain and his army of stooges. That and we also get the origin of the lullaby as Mercedes hums it to Ofelia to calm her down. It’s kinda funny though how Mercedes admits she doesn’t know the words to it so she just hums instead.
Later that night, Mercedes gets with Dr. Ferreiro and takes some more supplies to the rebels together while Ofelia gets a visit from the Faun in her new room. The Faun is slightly annoyed with her for not having gotten started on the second task yet, but since Ofelia admits that her mother isn’t doing well, the Faun gives her a mandrake root (which we previously saw being chopped up by the kitchen staff in a previous scene) and tells her to put it in a bowl of fresh milk with two drops of blood. By putting this under her mother’s bed, she’ll start to get better. The Faun then gives Ofelia the run-down on what to expect in the second task where I can only assume Ofelia zones out for most of it because she doesn’t follow the rules very well from here on. You’d think that being in the presence of a magical creature would give her the motivation to pay attention, but apparently not.
We briefly cut back to Mercedes and Dr. Ferreiro in a forest cave with the rebels and of course: this guy -
He’s called El Tarta (played by Ivan Massagué), and outside of Mercedes, he’s probably my favorite character in the movie, mostly because I just feel so bad for him! Later we’ll see that become clearer, but for now he’s just kinda there. There’s another rebel here suffering with a gangrene infested leg named Frenchie (played by Gonzalo Uriarte) and Dr. Ferreiro is forced to amputate it. Luckily we cut away before having to witness the bulk of it, but it doesn’t make it any easier to watch the split second we do see. Meanwhile, Ofelia is getting ready to embark on this movie’s most iconic sequence: the Pale Man sequence. She grabs the chalk given to her by the Faun to trace a door in the wall (Adam and Barbara Maitland would be proud) and turns an hourglass upside down after stepping into the chamber even though she was supposed to do that immediately after opening the door. Once the hourglass runs out, Ofelia needs to have completed her mission and made it back inside her room safely, so she takes the rest of the Faun’s fairy friends inside for guidance. After taking her sweet ass time getting to the main chamber despite the fact we already established this is a timed trial (seriously, most of the problems with her is that she doesn’t know the meaning of the word “quick”) we see this:
So the fairies tell Ofelia which tiny door she needs to use the key on. She deliberately disobeys them here, but in this instance it proves to be helpful since she picks the correct door and finds a dagger inside. However, despite the fact that Ofelia has been specifically instructed by the Faun not to eat anything on the table, the fact that time is still ticking on the hourglass, and the fact the fairies are screaming at her not to, Ofelia thinks now is the perfect time to eat a grape. Wow. Dumb. This also is an example of her disobeying instructions and it only causes more problems. Unsurprisingly, the Pale Man comes to life popping the eyeballs on the plate in front of him into his palm sockets.
This image is instantly iconic and very well drawn out. As far as scenes go in the movie, this is definitely one of the best moments of suspense and tension it has to offer even if it could’ve easily been avoided if Ofelia wasn’t a dumbass. Speaking of her, even after the Pale Man gets up she eats a second grape! Bitch, move it or lose it! Her hesitation results in the Pale Man devouring two of the fairies alive while Ofelia watches and only now does she decide to run. Naturally, she took too long and the door closes, locking her inside the chamber with the Pale Man. To save herself, she grabs the chalk to draw herself a new exit, but the Pale Man is close behind.
Ofelia barely manages to escape with her life, and the life of one of the fairies, and she slumps down on her bed in shame. As she should. Back with Mercedes, Dr. Ferreiro and the rest of the rebels, Mercedes discusses with her brother Pedro (played by Roger Casamajor) her current situation with Vidal and ends up giving him a copy of the storeroom key so he can get as many supplies as he wants. Also, this happens:
I don’t really know what the point of this scene is, but it gets me to hate Vidal even more, so I guess it’s doing something right. Not only that, but Ofelia puts the mandrake root under Carmen’s bed and she starts to feel better according to Dr. Ferreiro. Her fever’s down and her breathing’s steady. Magic! Though again, you could explain this as just a chance rebound that coincidentally happened as soon as Ofelia placed the mandrake. Vidal also tells Dr. Ferreiro that, if at all possible, he’d prefer the doctor to save his son over his wife, because testosterone father-son bullshit. As if we needed more reasons to hate this guy. Vidal then walks outside to see an explosion in the distance and he goes to investigate with a team of soldiers. Ofelia also pleads with her unborn brother to spare their mother’s life while she’s sleeping which is a promise he doesn’t intend to keep.
At the sight of the train explosion, one of the engineers reveals that nothing was stolen in the blast. Curious. So, of course, another explosion takes place back at the mill as soon as we learn of this. Some of Vidal’s lackeys, Garcés and Serrano (played by Manolo Solo and César Vea), managed to corner a small group of rebels in the forest which they then proceed to dispatch of with ruthless efficiency. When everything is said and done, there’s only one remaining rebel survivor which they take back to the storeroom in the mill. Mercedes hears about this and goes to make sure it’s not her brother Pedro, and as it turns out, it’s:
So this is when all hope starts to get lost. We start off with this brutal torture scene with Vidal doing the deed himself to make El Tarta give him the information he wants. What makes it worse is that Vidal insults El Tarta for his stutter by offering him a chance to escape if he can count to three without stuttering. Sure he means it, but he knows El Tarta won’t be able to do it, which he doesn’t. It doesn’t stop me from feeling bad for the poor guy, because this entire movie, for the brief amount of time he’s on screen, he’s taken advantage of, tossed aside, and abused relentlessly! This all culminates in him wanting to end it all after Vidal has “had his way” with him. It only gets worse from here. Not only do we have the brutal torture scene (sure we don’t see the act, but we see the end result which is probably worse), we also have a moment where the Faun re-enters Ofelia’s room and yells at her for breaking the rules (which, fair) and condemns her to never return to the Underground Realm. Dr. Ferreiro ends up putting El Tarta out of his misery after the poor guy begs the doctor to do it. Vidal finds out Dr. Ferreiro is working with the rebels by comparing a vial of antibiotics in the doctor’s case to the one he found at the campsite and seeing that they’re the same. Vidal also catches Ofelia under Carmen’s bed checking on the mandrake and riles up Carmen to teach her a lesson, which she does by tossing the mandrake in the fire, causing Carmen to collapse on the floor in pain. Vidal goes back downstairs to see that Dr. Ferreiro killed El Tarta and he shoots the doctor because of it. Then we end this whole sequence with Carmen finally giving birth, but dying in the process. Things couldn’t possibly seem worse at this point!
This is what I mean when I say that this movie is very harsh. Although, at this point, the end of the Second Act, our characters’ spirits are at their lowest. Does it get better from here? …Kinda… Ofelia steals a leftover vial of sleeping aid from the late doctor’s case which you bet will come into play later, and Vidal has a sit-down with Mercedes. It’s about as tense as you would expect.
At this point, Vidal has gathered from El Tarta’s intel that there’s an insider at the mill giving them supplies and information. He’s essentially already determined it to be Mercedes, he just wants the opportunity to fuck with her a little bit. He not-so-subtly implies to her that she’s high on his suspect list by feeding El Tarta’s intel back to her, and also telling her to get him more alcohol from the storeroom. She immediately gets up to go grab it for him, but wait!
He doesn’t try to arrest her there, mostly because he has a superiority complex (especially when it comes to women), so he let’s her go only for her to try to escape with Ofelia in the cold rainy night. They don’t get far, as shown through this awesomely staged moment:
This also calls back to the previous scene where Mercedes and Dr. Ferreiro met with the rebels in the woods the first time which is pretty neat. Of course they get taken back to the mill where Ofelia is confined to her room and Vidal gives the order to his soldiers that if anyone comes for her, they should shoot her. His own step-daughter. Christ this guy is the worst. I know I’ve said it a lot, but can you blame me? Screw this guy! Mercedes also gets tied up in the storeroom implying that she, much like El Tarta before her, is going to be tortured for information. However, while Vidal is taking his sweet time explaining everything he’s going to do, he has his back to her. This gives Mercedes the opportunity to cash in Chekhov’s Knife, cut through her ropes, and stab the shit out of Vidal!
The only problem I have with this is: she doesn’t kill him. WHY?!!! Guillermo del Toro explains that the reason she doesn’t kill him is because her knife is too small. I call bullshit. She could’ve just stabbed him in the head repeatedly, like right in the back of his head to get him up out of there super quick and also buy her some more time to escape! That just makes no sense! Either way, she runs off into the woods and we’re given a brief moment of humor where Garcés is sitting next to the radio listening to the lottery announcements. As you may remember, they picked up that lottery ticket from the camp earlier in the movie, so he’s checking to see if he won which is a small thing but still pretty funny. Of course, Vidal storms out of the storeroom in not nearly enough pain and screams for Garcés and Serrano to bring Mercedes to him. This kicks off a brief chase where eventually Garcés and Serrano catch up with Mercedes in the woods on horseback. It looks like this is going to be her last stand until gunshots come out of the forest hitting Garcés four times in the chest, killing him. It’s nice to see at least a glimmer of hope come back into this movie again.
So now, surprisingly, the Faun revisits Ofelia in her room and decides to give her one last chance so long as she’s willing to follow everything he says without question. Also, this moment is really cute:
What she needs to do is fetch her brother and bring him to el laberinto. That’s all the Faun tells Ofelia for now. Unfortunately for her, her brother is currently being kept in Vidal’s quarters, the same person who’s probably not too happy for having to stitch up his own sliced up face.
Luckily, the Faun gave Ofelia some more chalk to break her way out of her locked room undetected and she makes her way down despite the danger. This is also the point that the director likes to cite as rock solid evidence that the fantasy world is real. How else would she have gotten out of her locked bedroom unless she made her own chalk door?Honestly, I see what he means by that. Unless she carefully climbed out the window. Eventually she manages to get to her brother when Vidal is called away to take a look at the surviving Serrano after the ambush in the woods. Ofelia also uses her stolen bottle of sleeping aid to spike Vidal’s latest glass of alcohol. It’s not looking good for Vidal as he learns that there were far more rebels than he had anticipated and they managed to take out the rest of his watchtowers scattered throughout the forest. His supplies and men are dwindling, so he’s gotta do something. He goes back to his quarters to finish his glass of alcohol which is when he notices Ofelia after an explosion goes off outside. By the way, she probably would’ve been fine if she just ran. What is with this girl and her sense of urgency? Even after he spots her and demands she give him her brother she still refuses to run until Vidal starts giving chase. Not only that, but when she spiked Vidal’s alcohol, she could’ve just poured the whole frickin’ bottle into his glass. Instead she only puts a few drops in. Why didn’t she do that? That would’ve easily solved her problem!
Either way, Vidal completes his transition into a fairy tale monster by chasing Ofelia down as the rebels lay siege to the mill. We also see Mercedes and a small group of rebels break into Ofelia’s bedroom to rescue her only to find her not there, so Ofelia would’ve technically been okay if she just stayed in her room. Ofelia gets chased deep into el laberinto by Vidal until she meets a dead end. Normally labyrinths wouldn’t have dead ends, but the director intended for this scene to show how el laberinto is helping Ofelia because the walls open up around her so she can make her way to the center unimpeded and quickly close behind her leaving Vidal questioning his sense of reality. She takes her brother to the Faun who’s waiting for them there and tells her to hurry as the moon is almost at its peak. The Faun has the dagger with him and Ofelia asks him why. The reason is because in order to open the portal to the Underground Realm, they need to offer the blood of an innocent (i.e.: her brother). The Faun admits it will only be a small pinprick of blood, so not a lot, but Ofelia refuses to comply. The Faun gets pissed at her again since she promised to follow his orders without question, but she stands firm that she won’t harm her brother to return to the Underground Realm.
In the process, Vidal somehow makes it to the center and sees Ofelia talking to…nothing.
You could infer a couple things from this. While you could cite this as solid evidence of the fantasy world being fake, you could also take the director’s explanation. Guillermo del Toro explains that the reason Vidal doesn’t see the Faun is because he doesn’t believe in it. Makes sense, and also cements this movie as a fairy tale. Vidal approaches Ofelia, takes the baby, and shoots Ofelia in the stomach. Don’t worry, he dies soon. This brings us back around full circle to the opening of the film with Ofelia bleeding out as she collapses next to the pit and blood running down her hand. Vidal makes it back out of el laberinto only to see this:
He delivers his son to Mercedes who’s standing next to her brother, Pedro, and shares his most human moment of the movie. Vidal starts to look a bit emotional as he grabs his watch and checks the time. He asks the group to tell his son the exact time of his death when he gets older, just like how Vidal’s father, General Vidal, cracked his watch right before his death so Captain Vidal would know how a hero dies. Mercedes isn’t having any of it though, and says that his son won’t even know his name right before Pedro shoots him in the face.
It’s after this that Mercedes makes her way into el laberinto with the rest of the rebels to find Ofelia dying in the center of it all. But, Ofelia’s blood drips onto the portal at the bottom of the pit. The portal’s opened! So Ofelia earns her place among her true father the king and her recently deceased mother in her kingdom. Once again, you could see this ending as tragic if you believe the fantasy world to be fake while watching which is definitely up to your interpretation of the material, but it also ties back into Guillermo del Toro’s concept of immortality that we mentioned earlier. Remember that according to him, anyone who doesn’t care for the consequences of death is immortal in his eyes, which is essentially what Ofelia did. When faced with the opportunity to give her brother’s blood to open the portal, she refused and instead ended up giving her own. This of course resulted in her mortal body dying, but as the fable in the beginning explains, the princess’ mortal body is merely a vessel. It’s her soul that lives on in immortality which is what allows Ofelia to once again become the Underground Realm’s princess. There really are a bunch of different things that you could infer from this ending, and that’s the main thing I like about it. It’s also so great to see this at the end if you do happen to believe that the fantasy world is real in the film, because seeing so many characters happy and smiling in one scene is genuinely heartwarming while also having it juxtaposed with the tragic scene of Mercedes humming Ofelia’s lullaby over her corpse back in the real world. I could legit make an entire blog post just on interpreting this ending, but we don’t have time for that, I’ll just leave an open invitation for comments and ideas for anyone who’d like to discuss it!
As the film closes, we get a final narration from the Faun (just like the narration in the opening) who tells us that after the princess returned to her kingdom, she left little clues and memories from her time on Earth back in the real world, but only visible to those who know where to look. That then wraps up one of my Mapa’s favorite movies, and I can see why!
Talk about a magnificent film, there is frankly too much to praise here in one conclusion. Probably my favorite thing about the movie, and I imagine my Mapa’s favorite aspect of it too, is that the entire movie, to me, feels like a visual poem of sorts. Being an author, poet, and novelist themselves, my Mapa probably appreciates a lot of the visual representations of literature being displayed along with the sense of magical realism which is also their favorite genre to write in. Guillermo del Toro also explains that some of the inspiration for this film came from the works of the author Jorge Luis Borgez which my Mapa is also a fan of.
Taking each of these elements out of the picture, there’s still so much to enjoy including the intricate practical creature effects which I definitely fell in love with, the mature fairy tale theme, the interesting characters, and subtle visual touches. I’m legit surprised, much like my review of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, that I didn’t remember more from this movie going into this review. Although, one thing I do remember is that at the time I first saw this film, I was going through each of the films my family has in our DVD library to make sure there wasn’t a single one I hadn’t seen before. For that reason, I probably ended up forgetting a lot of what happened in the film purely because I was watching one new film each day, and I was trying to fulfill a personal quota which didn’t do any favors for my memory.
With all this being said, it’s not hard to see why this movie is a 3 time Oscar winner with Stephen King’s Seat-Squirming Seal of Approval when you can feel the artistry in every shot, every color palette on screen, every unique transition, and more. In case it’s been a minute since you’ve seen this movie last (much like myself), pop it in again and enjoy a surreal, fantastical, suspenseful, and exhilarating weekend movie night on me.
Given my opinion of this film, I feel obligated to give it a 4.5/5 satyrs. I can’t go at it 100% since I still am somewhat frustrated by some of Ofelia’s actions in the movie as you read previously, but I’ll also admit that much like The NeverEnding Story I did a couple weeks ago, it’s really close to a 5/5 (probably something like a 4.8 or 4.9/5). The only reason I call it a 4.5/5 is for simplicity’s sake.
For Mapa. Happy Birthday!
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Aladdin
The original Arabian Night is so much better in so many ways, and we’re here to look at it together with 1992’s Aladdin!
Huh, I thought I’d be taking a bit more of a break from Disney, but I guess my random movie picker had other plans for me. Either way, I do still like this movie and it is definitely better than I remember it much like Beauty and the Beast which I reviewed two weeks ago. While I wouldn’t necessarily say this film is better than Beauty and the Beast, it has definitely earned the title of ‘household classic’. From its lovable characters, amazing songs, gorgeous animation, and fun comedy, it’s no wonder this movie’s made a place for itself in many of our hearts. And also why Disney felt the need to remake it decades later, but that’s a different review. (Speaking of which, if anyone wants to see me review the Disney remakes, feel free to send me an e-mail. Of course I wouldn’t do any of them willingly.)
Sure there are great things in this movie, and as I’ve aged I can appreciate them more, but I won’t deny that there are still a few things that I’m not the biggest fan of (which should probably be the slogan for this blog). Since I want to give every film a fair shot, and I tend to be a bit harsher on movies I grew up with as a child, I will be going over these elements today. Make no mistake though: I still really like this movie! Whether it be fantastic cinematic experiences that last you for the rest of your life, or awkward Disney Renaissance tropes of over-correcting certain character archetypes that could’ve been seen as offensive in the past, we’ll be going over it all.
So rub those lamps and keep your hands and arms inside the carpet as we go through the original Disney classic: Aladdin!
One thing I find weird about the opening on Disney+ is how, before the film starts, it shows this disclaimer you see above. While I’m not saying people shouldn’t try to improve as time goes on, especially Disney (even more if this were playing before Song of the South), I’m not entirely sure what’s in Aladdin to warrant this kind of message. Now, I am familiar with the original version of the “Arabian Nights” song which included the line: “Where they cut off your ear if they don’t like your face.” Although, in the version shown on Disney+, that line isn’t included, so why is this disclaimer here? That’s honestly the only part that I would personally find objectionable, everything else in Aladdin seems fine to me, although there could be something I’m missing. If y’all would like to talk more about this in the comments, feel free to educate me, because after all, I’m about as white as the background of this page you’re currently reading.
Anyway, the opening title was always really cool to me as a kid with the flames billowing in the background, the music building up a sense of mysticism, and the title emerging from the flames as you see here. We then go straight into the opening song “Arabian Nights” (not the version I mentioned in the last paragraph that has that one uncomfortable line in it) which I always thought was really fun too. It gives the animators some time to show off the landscapes and environments of the city we’re about to be witnessing for the next 90 minutes which, as you may have guessed, are breathtaking.
That and it gives Robin Williams a chance to show off his singing. Yes, the merchant we see in the opening is actually played by Robin Williams as well. I’m pretty sure the filmmakers are trying to get across that he’s actually the Genie in disguise (especially since he just so happens to have the Genie’s old lamp on his person), but that’s not the most important part of this opening.
After failing to sell us anything, the merchant reveals the Genie’s lamp and tries pitching it to the audience by giving us the backstory behind it. This is when the story really gets going and we cut to the main villain of the movie, Jafar (played by Jonathan Freeman), who is immediately intimidating. Even his first line sends shivers down my spine every time I hear it.
I wish I could properly capture the pure boomy-ness of Jafar’s voice just in this written blog format, but I can’t so you’ll just have to take my word for it. Not only that, but I have to admit that I was pleasantly surprised watching this film again at just how funny Jafar can be as well. He’s really the whole Disney villain package: devilish, intimidating, and hilarious. All that aside, he’s waiting for the arrival of his accomplice Gazeem (played by Charlie Adler) who’s there to give him one half of a golden scarab which, once assembled, reveals the entrance to the Cave of Wonders. Yeah, now’s probably a good time to bring up the CG animation in the movie.
I will say, for the time it is pretty ambitious and is also a cool design for the cave, although it doesn’t blend the greatest with the rest of the hand-drawn animation in the film. At least in regards to the Cave of Wonders. There is some pretty good CG that we’ll take a closer look at later, but something that should also be mentioned is that Cave of Wonders doesn’t appear that much throughout the movie anyway, so I can’t blame the animators for prioritizing their CG designs. As Gazeem approaches the cave, per Jafar’s orders, the Cave of Wonders speaks to him and tells him “Only one can enter here. One who’s worth lies far within. The diamond in the rough.” Gazeem is obviously not the right person to go in which is why Jafar demands him to enter. Humans, merely pawns to our dear villain. When Gazeem steps inside, the Cave immediately collapses giving us our first death in this G-rated film. Not even 10 minutes in, 90’s G has clearly proven itself to be far superior to modern G.
Considering everything we’ve already seen thus far, I have to admit that this intro also is very good at getting the viewer invested. It introduces so many interesting concepts and ideas in the span of only a few minutes which only makes you want to keep watching just to see where everything is going. Not only does it hook you, but it delivers the goods as well, which we’ll discuss soon. For right now though, Jafar and his parrot sidekick Iago (played by the late great Gilbert Gottfried) need some way to track down this “Diamond in the Rough” as the cave describes. Enter our protagonist Aladdin (played by Scott Weinger) who’s in the process of escaping Agrabah’s city guards on account of him stealing a loaf of bread. You know, this makes me wonder what it would’ve been like if Disney made an animated version of Les Misérables.
Some things I can say about Aladdin right off the bat is that he definitely has a lot of personality. He’s acted well and easily likable even when he’s stealing things. It’s made clear from the beginning that he does what he needs to survive but still cares about other people. That and his animation is very good in showing how athletic/nimble he is, and how expressive he can be. One thing that can be a bit distracting in my opinion is his voice. Clearly he’s played by a guy who’s a product of the 90’s which can occasionally take you out of the illusion that this story is taking place in ancient Arabian times. Also, I know I’m preaching to the choir, but he’s obviously played by a white guy. Is that what Disney meant when they put that disclaimer up on Disney+? This is an open invitation for Disney to be more specific about what’s wrong in their movies that they decide to put disclaimers in front of.
I’ll definitely give credit where credit is due though for the song “One Jump Ahead.” It manages to explain Aladdin’s character, situation, and the humorous nature of this movie very well in very little time.
This also brings up the point that this film was Disney’s first foray into a purely comedic adventure. Of course they had movies in the past which had comedic elements to support the main focus of their films which were primarily heartwarming or emotional, but this was Disney’s first movie that had the comedy as the focus. Practically every character in the film has some sort of funny line, or has some form of comedic slapstick to make the audience giggle, or even both. This movie does have genuine conflict, suspense, romance, and drama as well, but the comedic beats are definitely the primary takeaway and they’re done very well.
After escaping the guards by foreshadowing the magic carpet later, Aladdin comes across the scene that proves to the audience why he’s the “Diamond in the Rough.” There are two young orphans hunting for scraps of food and Aladdin feels compelled to give them his half of the bread loaf. His monkey sidekick Abu (played by Frank Welker) needs a bit more convincing, but that is also the primary character trait that surrounds him throughout the rest of the movie which is pretty clever. In the meantime a pompous prince named Achmed (played by Corey Burton) is off to the palace to be the princess’s next suitor where Aladdin interrupts him after he tries whipping the two orphans he just helped. Achmed pushes him aside into a dirty puddle where Aladdin leaves him with one last insult.
Joking aside, Achmed responds with an insult of his own which really sends Aladdin into a blind rage and the animation on his face is genuinely Prince of Egypt Rameses-esque. This also leads to Aladdin unknowingly singing about how he’s the “Diamond in the Rough” and giving us a genuinely ironic line of Aladdin imagining people who live in palaces not having problems. Oh, you poor naive boy. This is also when we’re officially introduced to the Sultan (played by Douglas Seale) and his daughter Jasmine (played by Linda Larkin). I know this is going to be hard to believe, but Jasmine’s a princess who doesn’t want to be a princess, is being asked to marry someone she doesn’t love, and doesn’t want to conform to society. Surely it’s difficult for you to take that logical leap. In case you couldn’t tell, that was sarcasm.
Honestly, as a kid Jasmine was probably one of my favorite Disney princesses, mostly because I also watched the Aladdin cartoon series where she does a lot more stuff, but now that I’m older, in this movie she’s kinda just another Disney Renaissance princess. Including Belle from Beauty and the Beast I reviewed a couple weeks ago, Ariel from The Little Mermaid, and Megara from Hercules, Jasmine has a lot of similar traits to them. She can be charming and likable in her rejection of societal norms, but I can’t act like this hasn’t been done several times already, especially within this same company. I think where she really shines is in her chemistry that she has with Aladdin which will become clearer later, but on her own she’s kinda boring. At least in the movie. To be real, even the scenes she has with her father the Sultan are kinda meh. Only when the Sultan meets with Jafar for the first time do we get some more entertainment back into the picture where Jafar hypnotizes the Sultan into giving him his diamond ring. We don’t know what it’s for just yet, but it does a good job in introducing us to the idea of how Jafar probably got this position in the first place and how he’s managed to get so close to the Sultan. It’s also pretty funny which is a good bonus.
We then see Jasmine run away dressed in rags because she wants to be out in the real world and we need to hit all of her clichéd character beats. This is where we see Aladdin get attracted to her for the first time and Jasmine almost get her hand cut off for giving an apple away to a kid without paying for it.
Of course Aladdin saves her and takes her back to his hideout where they start bonding over their teenage problems. Before that we also get closure on what Jafar wanted the Sultan’s ring for, because he uses it in some sort of magic contraption thing to reveal to him who can enter the Cave of Wonders. It’s never made entirely clear what this contraption thing is, but in a world where wish granting genies exist it’s not that farfetched. Meanwhile, Aladdin tosses Jasmine one of the apples they stole earlier in a unique way that I always tried to replicate as a kid but could never get right.
This’ll become important later, but for now it’s just cute. Although, since Jafar discovered Aladdin as the “Diamond in the Rough,” he sent out a swarm of guards to hunt him down and bring him to the palace which they do. Jasmine reveals herself as the princess to try to demand the guards to let him go, but their hands are tied. She goes to confront Jafar and he lies to her saying that he had Aladdin killed. Jasmine of course runs off crying and sobs to her pet tiger Rajah that she never got to know his name. That’s very touching, but plot-wise that’ll be very convenient for Aladdin later. In reality though, Aladdin is still alive and well living in the dungeon to allow Jafar to intercept him while in disguise and send him off to the Cave of Wonders to recover the lamp for him. So they escape via a secret dungeon tunnel and set off for the cave, but before we continue, why was that tunnel there? I can understand a palace having secret passageways in order for royalty to escape during a siege or something, but in the dungeon? The only place you specifically don’t want any person getting out of? That’s just the slightest bit weird.
So Aladdin and Abu make it to the cave with the help of disguised Jafar where they’re told to touch nothing but the lamp. As you can see, that’s gonna be a bit of a tough ask for them:
Literally any of this stuff would be enough to make you into the next Jeff Bezos, so restraint is key, Abu! Yeah, much like I said before, Abu is clearly the character that’s the most obsessed with riches in the film which will eventually be his and Aladdin’s undoing in the cave, but we’ll get to that. For right now they come across a magic carpet who is immediately bursting with personality. It’s surprising, for what’s just an inanimate object, this thing has so much life and energy to it that it makes it hard not to smile whenever it’s onscreen. That and the CG animation used to bring it to life is definitely the best in the movie. Granted that makes the most sense since this character will be sticking with us until the end of the film. They also combine its animation style with hand-drawn which helps it blend more among the other characters too.
Carpet takes them to the lamp where Aladdin takes it and Abu is mesmerized by a giant ruby which he tries to steal and fails when the Cave calls him out for touching it. Everything starts to collapse around them and Carpet brings them back up to the entrance where Jafar is waiting for the lamp. Aladdin hands it over and Jafar tries to stab Aladdin like a true Disney villain. I love it. Abu stops Jafar by biting him which causes Aladdin, Abu, and Carpet to fall into the cave as it finally collapses entirely. Jafar, back on the surface, is super happy to finally have the lamp only to find out that he doesn’t have it anymore! Back at the palace, Jasmine brings up Jafar “killing” Aladdin with the Sultan. It lasts less than a minute so it’s just kinda there. Sure it does play a bit of a role later creating a rift between Jasmine and Jafar which ends up growing until the end, but I was kinda hoping for a bit more of a developed relationship between Jasmine and her father being represented here. Instead it’s just kinda standard.
Meanwhile, Aladdin wakes up to find he and his friends are trapped and Abu stole the lamp from Jafar before falling. He’s a bit unsure what’s so special about the thing until he tries to read something engraved on it. Aladdin rubs the side of it to get a better look which is when it starts to go crazy and we’re introduced to most people’s favorite character: the Genie (played by Robin Williams).
What can I say about this character that hasn’t already been said be everyone else? He’s funny, he’s energetic, he’s adorable, he’s the perfect contrast to Aladdin’s down-to-earth persona. Although, one thing I don’t think people talk about enough when it comes to this character is his animation. Pretty much everyone knows that everything Genie says in the film was improvised by Robin Williams (with the exception of the Alan Menken song lyrics), but because each of his lines were improvised, it only made the animators’ jobs that much harder. However, they manage to give him so much fluidity in his movements as Robin Williams smoothly transitions from reference to reference and impression to impression. There’s a lot that’s being visually taken for granted here as you can see if you watch the sequels that also feature the Genie. They’re animated passably, but they’re nowhere near as visually stunning as the original’s animation.
That and, of course, the “Friend Like Me” song number is so much fun to watch, listen to, and even dance to if you’re someone who likes to do that (like me). Aladdin seems impressed by his new friend, but is a bit overwhelmed by now having the ability to get anything he wants. Genie at least tells him the few limitations he has in his magic to get him started though: he can’t kill people, he can’t make anyone fall in love, and he can’t bring people back from the dead. Upon hearing this Aladdin’s scheming brain starts scheming and he convinces Genie to get him and Abu out of the cave without using one of his three wishes. This is a great way to show how cunning Aladdin can be which of course also comes back into play later and gives this movie a few more minutes of theatrical run time. Since it’s only 90 minutes it really needed some extra padding.
In the palace, the Sultan tries to get Jasmine and Jafar to make-up, but Jasmine isn’t really receptive which is understandable given her belief that she had Aladdin killed. Once she and the Sultan leave, Jafar and Iago come up with the idea to convince the Sultan to have Jasmine marry Jafar through complicated legal action. After that bit of genius-ness, Jafar and Iago share an evil laugh that always makes me laugh and we check back with Aladdin and Genie. They just made their way to an oasis and Aladdin admits that he tricked Genie into getting him and his friends out of the cave without using a wish. Genie admits that Aladdin was clever, but he won’t do anything for free like that again and Aladdin thinks about what he’ll wish for. Here is where Genie gets a chance to show his more sensitive side which makes him feel more like a fleshed out character. If he were only comedic and upbeat all the time I don’t think this performance would’ve worked as well, so it’s nice to see him be a layered character.
Genie tells Aladdin about his imprisonment in the lamp and how he’s forced to grant wishes for eternity unless one of his masters decides to wish him free. Aladdin then promises to set Genie free after using his first two wishes which he then uses one to become a prince so he can be Jasmine’s next suitor. It kinda goes without saying that there are several ways Aladdin could’ve manipulated reality in order to get what he wanted a lot faster, but I believe that given the knowledge he currently has, he would think that this would be the best way to go after Jasmine’s heart. Especially since Genie can’t make anyone fall in love. On their way to the palace, Jafar tries to hypnotize the Sultan into marrying him and Jasmine until Aladdin and co shows up with all the fanfare and theatrics you would expect from a prince from a country you’ve never heard of.
Legit though, “Prince Ali” is a really fun number with some great visuals, lyrics, and melodies that get stuck in your head and refuse to leave. Not gonna lie, this is one of those songs that just randomly pops into my head sometimes and I can’t stop thinking about which really speaks to how great it is. This leads to more humor with the Sultan and the carpet riding around the throne room while terrorizing Iago and Jafar not trusting Aladdin’s story about being a prince from a far off country he’s never heard of. While it’s funny, it does beg the question: Why doesn’t Jafar recognize Aladdin? Sure Aladdin obviously wouldn’t recognize Jafar since he was disguised when he was working with him, but Aladdin just put on a turban, he didn’t change his face at all, so why wouldn’t Jafar recognize his face? I’d probably be able to forgive it more if that was the reason Jafar didn’t trust him, but he doesn’t trust him because he was only just talking to the Sultan about having Jasmine marry him since she didn’t like any of the suitors. It only gets better when Jasmine comes in and hears the three of them discussing her future without her consent, so she scolds them. I’ll admit it gets funny again when the Sultan walks away with Aladdin and Jafar says with complete conviction:
After that, Aladdin is debating what to do to win over Jasmine when Genie gives him the advice to come clean and tell her the truth. They do show in this scene that Aladdin is at the very least ashamed of his true identity which explains why he would feel compelled to do this, I just feel a slight bit frustrated that this idea isn’t even given a second thought by him. Maybe that’s just because I’ve lied similarly to this before in my past and it’s just the slightest bit embarrassing. It does at least lead to some of Jasmine’s funniest scenes where she humiliates him on the balcony until he decides to jump off of it. Of course he reveals to her that he has a magic carpet and convinces her to take a ride with him by utilizing a call back.
They hop on Carpet together and go on a romantic ride across the world while singing quite possibly the most iconic song from the movie: “A Whole New World.” Like I said before, Aladdin and Jasmine’s chemistry is really well done and probably some of Jasmine’s best moments on screen are when she’s paired with him. It’s perfectly adorable, hummable, and beautiful. Definitely one of the main reasons these two are one of Disney’s power couples. That and Aladdin tips off Jasmine some more to his true identity by doing this as well:
After taking a pit stop in China to see the New Year’s festival, Jasmine officially outs Aladdin and demands he tell her the truth. Did I say Jasmine’s funniest moments were earlier, well I was lying, this is her funniest moment:
In the end, he continues to lie to her and says that he only occasionally leaves his kingdom dressed as a commoner to escape the stresses of palace life. You see what I’m saying? They had this whole sequence already of Jasmine getting to like him, so why is he still lying to her? I know that they’re trying to get across a “Liar Revealed” type thing here to help make the lesson they’re going for clearer. What makes it more interesting to me is that unlike other films that utilize this trope, this movie only uses elements of the trope instead of following it so unbelievably closely to the point where it just becomes tired and predictable. Outside of this aspect of the story, there are still other things in the movie to keep you invested besides this, but these are still the weakest parts of the movie in my opinion.
Upon making it back to Agrabah, Aladdin gets a kiss from Jasmine, his heart flutters, and he’s on top of the world until he gets attacked by the palace guards. Well, that was fast.
Naturally, this is all a plan from Jafar to kill Aladdin so he can marry Jasmine and become Sultan instead. However, he didn’t count on Aladdin having the lamp in his turban still! In the water though, you really get the weight of suspense seeing Aladdin struggle against the ball and chain he’s attached to which again speaks to the animation quality. He just barely manages to rub the lamp before passing out due to lack of oxygen and Genie uses Aladdin’s second wish to save his life. What’s nice about this is how we’ve seen more of Genie getting attached to Aladdin up until now with him even trying to help Aladdin win over Jasmine earlier before the “A Whole New World” sequence, so it’s believable that he would probably like him enough by this point to do this for him. They head back to the palace where Jafar has gone full hypno psycho on the Sultan to get him to marry Jafar and Jasmine. What he wasn’t counting on was Aladdin being right there and exposing Jafar as a traitor. The characters want to be torn up about this, but Aladdin and Jasmine are just such a cute couple! That’s kinda what the Sultan’s reaction is when he sees Jasmine has chosen to marry Aladdin, but it starts to sink in with Aladdin just what’s going to happen as eventually he’ll become Sultan himself.
Jafar, on the other hand, escapes to his secret hideout and has himself the most delightful crazy laugh that always makes me laugh. This is because he saw the lamp in Aladdin’s turban before he disappeared in the palace guards’ hands. Now he knows who he is and calls on Iago to steal the lamp for him. Back in Aladdin’s quarters, he’s feeling the mope as he sulks around thinking about the future. Genie tries to cheer him up feeling like this is finally his time to be set free, but Aladdin tells him that he can’t because he needs him to keep from being found out. Again, there are definitely several ways around this, but here I at least believe that Aladdin wouldn’t be able to see that yet. This all takes place within the span of about a day, and having been someone myself who’s been so ashamed of the truth that they’ve felt the need to hide it at all costs, I think I’d probably come to the same conclusion at this point if I were in Aladdin’s shoes. Of course this leads to Genie being completely heartbroken and hiding in his lamp until Aladdin gets lured out by Iago pretending to be Jasmine which is pretty funny.
It’s here that Iago manages to steal the lamp while Aladdin’s gone, and while Aladdin goes to give a speech to his new public, Jafar gets the lamp and makes his first wish to become Sultan. Here’s where things start to go crazy as the palace falls apart and the Sultan loses his clothes to Jafar. While Jasmine is firmly defiant of Jafar’s “rule,” the Sultan is pretty quick to accept it himself which may explain why the Sultan was trying to find someone to marry Jasmine and become Sultan themselves so quickly. Also it’s pretty funny to see the Sultan bow to Jafar, see Jasmine in staunch opposition to that notion, and quickly correct himself. This prompts Jafar to make his second wish becoming the most powerful sorcerer in the world. It’s also clear in these scenes that while Genie has to be subservient to his master despite Aladdin’s protests, he clearly doesn’t like it. He also gets quite the glow-up, I mean he looks really awesome when he grows so big that he picks up the castle and puts it on a mountain.
Jafar uses his new powers to humiliate Jasmine and the Sultan, reveal Aladdin’s lies, and sing quite possibly the funniest villain song just behind “Gaston.” Granted this song is really just “Prince Ali” with different lyrics, but Jonathan Freeman sings it so hilariously. Jafar ends up sending Aladdin off to the ends of the Earth “WHOPEE!” which lands him in the Arctic, I think, where he learns the error of his ways and uses Carpet to get back to Agrabah. Kind of a detour, but it at least has some story and character significance so I give it a pass. Back in Agrabah, Jafar and Iago are living it up and Jafar decides he wants to marry Jasmine just because now and he wants to use his third wish to make her fall in love with him. Yeah. She’s 15. The story doesn’t tell you that and she’s played by a 20-something, but it makes you feel so much better knowing, doesn’t it? You’re welcome. I’ll spare you the picture at least, that just makes it worse.
Genie tells Jafar that he can’t make anyone fall in love, but Jafar isn’t having it until Jasmine decides to fake it till she makes it. Genie gives the appropriate response.
It’s here that Aladdin makes his way into the palace and tries to get the lamp back, but Jafar notices him and responds with the most honest Disney villain line that could’ve just as easily come out of a comic book villain:
This kicks off our climax where Jafar tries to kill Aladdin with dad jokes until he ends up transforming himself into a giant snake in some even more awesome animation which results in more reasons 90’s G is better than modern G when Aladdin stabs snake Jafar with visible blood! Eventually snake Jafar gets the better of Aladdin until snake Jafar reminds him of Genie’s power. Aladdin then uses this to convince snake Jafar that he’s not powerful enough and Genie is still stronger than he is which leads to him using his third wish to become a genie himself. Genie grants the wish and Jafar becomes a genie himself until he sees the huge asterisk of an eternity of servitude that comes along with it. He’s sucked into his black lamp along with Iago and Genie flicks them into the Cave of Wonders.
Of course it’s at this point that, since we’re wrapping things up, Aladdin makes the decision to use his third wish to free Genie which is both heartwarming and funny at the same time. He starts to celebrate until he realizes he’s not going to be seeing his friends for a while which results in a touching moment.
Without being a prince anymore, Aladdin can’t marry Jasmine under the law, but the Sultan decides to change the law on the spot so Jasmine can marry whoever she wants. Really dude, you could’ve done that from the beginning?! Come on! So now the two of them can be married, Genie heads off to see the world, we see Aladdin and Jasmine fly off on Carpet into the full moon, and we end on one last bit of meta-humor.
And that was Aladdin! After all these years, I think it still holds up pretty well.
Sure I did go into detail on some of the things I’ve noticed over the years, and those do prevent this film from being a masterwork as I originally saw it as a kid, but it does still have a lot of great things in it. From animation, to characters, to humor, to romance, it really has a lot to enjoy for many different people. Of course, I stand by that any person of any age can enjoy this movie, and, to this day, they still do! Disney still promotes these characters in their parks and resorts because so many people adore them and they, like many other iconic characters Disney has created, have become synonymous with classic children’s storytelling. Much like Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin has definitely earned its place among the pantheon of Disney tales in their hand-drawn library that dates back to the late 1930’s.
I do still ‘wish’ Disney would try something like this again on a feature-length scale. Something that calls back to the roots of the company especially after having been around for as long as it has and showing off just how much talent and energy is still left in a company that no one doesn’t know the name of. There would have to be a lot of reorganization and a gigantic push for something like that though, and I’m sure that’s very unlikely to happen anytime soon, so we should expect a lot of CG animated films out of this company for a while, but the good news is that these classic stories are still here. If you want to relive your childhood in all the best ways, this is certainly an arabian weekend movie night I would recommend.
I’d personally rate this a 4.5/5 genie lamps on account of those hiccups earlier, but it’s still a far cry from me not recommending it whatsoever. Looking past those things, there’s still plenty to love about this film.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I’m just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
The NeverEnding Story
Turn around, look at what you see! This week we’ll be looking at the original self-writing book that sucks you into it both literally and figuratively with The NeverEnding Story!
Disclaimer:
Mild swearing, mild nudity, and Spoilers!
Good to see that my random movie picker finally moved me away from Disney stuff, so now I can take a look at a classic kid’s film from the 80’s: The NeverEnding Story. I used to watch this movie when I was a kid in the mid-2000’s myself and loved it very much, and it’s safe to say that I still love it now. While there are certain things I’ve come to realize with every film I used to watch as a kid that just don’t add up like in the case of WALL-E and Beauty and the Beast like I reviewed over the past couple of weeks, this film has a certain charm to its faults. In some respects its flaws are also its pros, and anything in this film I would personally consider to be a flaw are few and far between. Considering when this film came out and what audience they’re clearly addressing can create a bit of a disconnect as well, mostly as I’ve gotten older and have become an overly critical birch.
To put things in perspective, this movie came out the same year as Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom in 1984, so the children this movie is trying to represent are not going to be the same as the children of my generation that were watching this movie 20 years later. That’s not something I can inherently fault the movie on though, since what matters more is the message of the film which I believe has certainly stood the test of time. Everything that’s good about this movie is something that any child of any generation can enjoy, even adults for that matter since, being an 80’s PG kid’s movie, it does explore darker and more macabre themes that modern kid’s cinema would avoid like the plague. Not only can it be dark, but it can be funny, engaging, thrilling, visually stunning, and very creative. Also with the film being only 90 minutes (kinda ironic considering the title says it’s never-ending), it’s impressive how they managed to make the story coherent, make the characters likable, and give the message time to breathe in that amount of time. Well enough of me gushing over this movie, let’s get into the nitpicking which I’m sure y’all love to hear from me at this point. Don’t worry I only criticize the things I love. That’s not true. That’s so not true.
Without further ado, grab your books and hold onto your friends tightly so they don’t get sucked into nothingness, this is The NeverEnding Story!
Watching this movie for the first time in a while, I forgot how surreal and etheric these opening titles are. Not only is it beautifully accompanied by this movie’s main theme: ‘The NeverEnding Story’ sung by Limahl, but the smoky, cloud covered backgrounds leave you with both a feeling of wonder and dread at the same time. They color shift from shot to shot and along with the strong wind sounds occasionally thrown in alongside the music, it really creates an illusion that you’re being transported to another world, flying, or dreaming. And wow did I say the word ‘dreaming’ at just the right time since after the credits are over we’re introduced to our protagonist Bastian (played by Barret Oliver) who’s just waking up from a dream he had about his dead mother. I might not be reviewing a Disney movie, but opening with a dead mother makes it feel like I am.
He goes downstairs to get ready for school where his father is waiting (played by Gerald McRaney) who gives him a good exposition - I mean lecture. As it turns out our hero is struggling after the death of his mother by not doing as well in school and distracting himself with books and fantasy to numb the pain. Good thing he doesn’t know what drugs and alcohol are. Even though we don’t see Bastian’s father for very long, he comes across as genuine and loving enough while also willing to support his son even if he doesn’t like how his life is going right now. I know I said that about the same man who’s responsible for the child who ends up locking himself in his school’s attic for an entire day while he doesn’t suspect a thing, but I digress. Either way, on Bastian’s way to school we get even more confirmation that this is an 80’s movie with the addition of the stock bully characters (played by Chris Eastman, Darryl Cooksey, and Nicholas Gilbert). They throw him in a dumpster for not giving them his lunch money (I assume), and while this is an overused trope of a bullied main character, especially in stories that were released during this decade, this is the same character who draws unicorns in his textbook margins and spends his time reading books instead of playing video games at the arcade like the cool kids, so I totally believe he would be bullied. I’m not saying I’d bully him, but I see why he would be bullied.
After escaping the dumpster and getting chased by the bullies again, he hides himself in the store of one Carl Conrad Coreander (played by Thomas Hill). Coreander at first shoos Bastian away, but upon learning of his passion for reading and literature, he starts to have a more personal conversation with him. This is when Bastian notices Coreander is reading a very peculiar looking book and Bastian asks him about it. I’m just gonna say it as well, this scene has only improved with age for me.
On the surface it seems like Coreander is trying to scare Bastian into not wanting to read this book, but since we know that he’s only just learned about Bastian’s passion for reading, it’s not hard to see that what he’s actually doing is enticing him. It makes you think about what kind of person Coreander really is and if he in some way has a connection to the NeverEnding Story, because he probably does. At the end of the movie we hear about how Bastian ends up going on several different adventures himself because of the NeverEnding Story, so you could assume that Coreander was merely passing the torch onto Bastian after having been the caretaker of the NeverEnding Story before him. Only 10 minutes into this movie and it’s already raising some thought-provoking questions, damn it’s so good!
Coreander goes to take a call so Bastian steals the book while he’s away, and he makes his way to school where the teachers and faculty seem equally uninterested in keeping track of him as his father is. I mean really, he goes into school where no one is waiting at the principal’s office to admit him, he runs through the completely empty and camera-free halls to his classroom door where his teacher apparently didn’t care to take attendance, and he easily makes his way to a locked stairway room that leads to the school’s attic where the key is kept in a broken lock box which is easily accessible to any tween kid who may want to get it. While this is phenomenally irresponsible on behalf of the adults in charge of this school, I give it a pass.
Why would I do that? Well, I actually brought all of these points up with my mom who’s also a big fan of this movie, however she actually grew up in the 80’s herself. She didn’t deny that the points I mentioned highlighted how irresponsible the authority figures are, but she also brought up how that’s just kinda how things were back then. Though not the best way to keep track of children, this is the same decade that gave us those ‘It’s 10:00 pm, where are your kids?’ PSA’s, so after hearing that, it makes more sense that Bastian would be able to sneak through his school entirely undetected like this. Also I think it feeds a bit into what the movie is all about since Bastian sneaks into a dusty attic full of various mysterious items which also happens to be connected to his clean and marbled school. It’s an interesting and somewhat magical place that you never would’ve guessed to be a part of this seemingly drab and monochromatic building. Kind of like how books can appear uninteresting until you open them up and start reading, buildings/environments can also seem boring until you look closer.
Once Bastian gets comfortable he starts to read and we’re introduced to the world of Fantasia (Disney permitting) where we see a campsite get interrupted by the arrival of my second favorite character in this movie: the Rock Biter (played by an uncredited Alan Oppenheimer). Also, we get started on some of the darker imagery pretty quickly while we watch the Rock Biter approach the campers Teeny Weeny (played by Deep Roy) and Night Hob (played by Tilo Prückner) with creepy trees being knocked over, and rumbling/crushing sounds getting closer and closer to them.
I also really love the design of these characters including the Rock Biter himself, Teeny Weeny’s Racing Snail, and Night Hob’s Stupid Bat. While they may not be the most realistic per say (I mean heck, Rock Biter’s lips rarely, if ever, match up with what he actually says), they do still look distinct from each other and clearly have a unique style that makes it easy to believe that they all come from different parts of the same world. After the Rock Biter shows off the reason he’s called ‘Rock Biter’, he explains why he’s here which introduces us to the concept of the Nothing. As it turns out in Fantasia there’s an entity that’s appeared which destroys/absorbs/erases everything it comes into contact with leaving nothing in its place. Literally nothing. Hence the name: the Nothing. Everyone at the campsite has been called to the home of Fantasia’s Empress, the Ivory Tower (I’ll also say it’s kinda funny that the center of this world’s government is literally called the Ivory Tower), who is supposed to have the solution to this issue. Upon making it there, the Empress’ assistant Cairon (played by Moses Gunn) explains that the Empress is dying since her life force seems to be tied to Fantasia itself that the Nothing is now destroying. Their only chance now is a hero named Atreyu.
I didn’t question this when I was younger, but when Atreyu (played by Noah Hathaway) reveals himself to the council, Cairon just assumes he’s a stray child. After rewatching this movie for this review I started asking myself why Cairon or the rest of the council wouldn’t have just double checked to make sure they had the right person. Although, after thinking about this I feel like it might be more clever than I originally thought. When Cairon first says Atreyu’s name, we cut back to Bastian in the attic who has momentarily put the book down to look at an image of a Native tribesman on horseback hunting a buffalo that Bastian just so happens to have on his backpack. Bastian then picks the book back up and we see Atreyu appear as a young Native boy. Part of me wonders if this was in some way Bastian’s influence on Fantasia. By looking at that image of the Native tribesman, Bastian manifested Atreyu in the story to appear similarly to the image he already had of him in his head and he appeared as a young boy since Bastian would likely relate to a young boy more than a grown man. However this mismatch of expectations is likely what threw Cairon off and prompted him to believe that Atreyu wasn’t the Atreyu he sent for when he first saw him.
At first Cairon wants to shoo Atreyu away, but since Fantasia is in dire straits right now, he decides to send Atreyu out on this quest anyway even if he wasn’t expecting him to be so…inexperienced. He gives Atreyu a medal called the Auryn, which also happens to be the same symbol that’s on the cover of the book, that’s supposed to guide and protect him. With that, he’s off to save Fantasia. Unbeknownst to him and his horse Artax is that the servant of the Nothing called Gmork (also played by an uncredited Alan Oppenheimer) is off to prevent Atreyu and Artax from finishing their quest. In the end he turns out to be pretty bad at doing this, but we’ll get to that later. Sure he may not be the best servant, but he does offer some more of that creepy imagery in the movie that I was talking about before, so I at least appreciate that. Also I couldn’t find any pictures of Gmork’s intro with him in the overgrown cave, but I did manage to find this creepy ass AI artwork of him:
Along the journey the movie occasionally cuts back to Bastian in the attic offering reactions to what he reads in the book. Sometimes this can come off as a bit cheap when they cut back to him just so he can say a character’s name. He does this after Atreyu comes across the Shell Mountain and Bastian says ‘Morla the Ancient One’, they cut back to Bastian so he can say ‘The Southern Oracle’, and last towards the end when he says ‘The Empress’. The good news is that he does this rarely and most of the time when they cut back to Bastian in the attic it’s to offer something more than just a character’s name which also feeds into the main idea behind the movie as well, but that’ll become clear later.
For now we also get a bit of a sense that there are parts of the movie that we aren’t seeing since after Atreyu and Artax get a quick snack, the next time we see them is in the Swamps of Sadness. The reason I say this is because once we see them in the swamp, Bastian narrates that they’ve already searched places like the Silver Mountains, the Desert of Shattered Hopes, and the Crystal Towers until they made it to the Swamps of Sadness to find Morla the Ancient One for guidance. We never find out what those places are like or even look like, so it makes me wonder if there are certain parts of the story that were cut down for the sake of time. After all, this movie is only 90 minutes like I mentioned previously, so it’s definitely possible that that’s the case, and it becomes a bit more apparent when Artax drowns in the swamp. This happens only 30 minutes into the film and this is only the second scene that we’ve seen him in which is already pretty jarring, but to be fair, I cried my eyes out at this scene as a kid.
I think what makes this scene so effective isn’t the fact that we’re losing a character that we’ve gotten time to grow attached to, but we’re losing a character that meant a lot to our lead as we can see through Noah Hathaway’s performance here. With the camera angles and dramatic music as well, it only makes the scene that much more impactful. Even if that’s not enough, we also see throughout the rest of the movie just how much Artax meant to Atreyu in various other scenes such as when Atreyu first meets Falkor the Luckdragon and he says “It’s nice to have a friend again”, when Atreyu comes across the wall of paintings detailing his adventure towards the end and he sees Artax’s death among them, and when Atreyu mentions Artax’s death to the Empress in the final moments of Fantasia. Sure I get the sense that this part of the story was a bit cut down for the sake of time, but you definitely get the sense throughout the rest of the movie that the weight of this moment is constantly beating down on our hero from here until the end.
Eventually Atreyu comes across Morla the Ancient One who is frickin’ hilarious. She also serves as a much-needed levity after the death of a beloved friend like Artax with her completely nihilistic approach to life, her sarcastic remarks, and her constant sneezing since she’s actually allergic to youth.
I laugh so much at her whenever I see this scene, although she actually doesn’t know what’s needed to save Fantasia or cure the Empress. However, she does tip Atreyu off to the existence of the Southern Oracle 10,000 miles away from their current location which definitely kills any sort of optimism Atreyu had left. This is when the final bell rings at Bastian’s school for everyone to go home leaving him in the school completely by himself. He also gets momentarily scared by a wolf head on a stick which reminds us that Gmork is still hunting Atreyu down. Atreyu almost drowns in the Swamps of Sadness, you can assume in part because of the loss of hope of ever reaching the Southern Oracle and the death of Artax that’s still weighing on him, but luckily ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) he gets saved by my all time favorite character, Falkor the Luckdragon (played by a credited Alan Oppenheimer (yeah, for some reason they only credited him for Falkor’s voice)), just as Gmork was about to eat him.
Falkor to me is the perfect blend of both wise and goofy at the same time. He has a calm and comforting demeanor which makes him easily the most likable character in the movie, and of course he makes a great plushie too.
Atreyu wakes up clean and healed in Falkor’s arms while also just outside the home of a gnome couple. Their names are Engywook (played by Sydney Bromley) and Urgl (played by Patricia Hayes) and they’re what you would expect most elderly straight couples to be: constantly fighting yet somehow endearing in their dislike of each other.
Urgl is the one who’s nursed Atreyu back to health, but Engywook just so happens to be an expert on the Southern Oracle. It’s also pretty lucky since Falkor has already taken Atreyu 9,891 miles towards the Southern Oracle already leaving only 109 miles left to go. What’s kinda weird about this is that Atreyu ends up walking the entire rest of the way to the Southern Oracle without the help of Falkor which is a bit unbelievable, but I assume this was another way that the filmmakers tried to keep the runtime focused. Even with this logical leap the movie is still pretty great. There is unfortunately a catch to the journey to the Southern Oracle, and that’s the fact that you have to pass through 2 gates which test your character beforehand as Engywook explains. The first is a gate featuring two sphinxes which judge your confidence in yourself. As demonstrated by another adventurer who attempts to pass through it, lack of confidence results in your death.
No pressure, Atreyu. That’s what he thinks as he sets out to make his way through the gate with no hesitation whatsoever, but his confidence wavers after he sees the barbecued remains of the previous adventurer he just saw die. Also, when I saw this movie as a kid, this image scared me so much!
The sphinx’s eyes start to open to blast Atreyu to bits as his confidence wanes, but he runs through and barely makes it to the other side before he gets fried. Sure he made it through the first gate, but there’s one more as Engywook goes back to explain to Urgl and Falkor. The next gate is called the Magic Mirror Gate and is supposed to reveal to the adventurer what their ‘true self’ is. Falkor initially brushes that aside as an easy test, but Engywook says that it’s not so easy. Our true selves are often hard for us to comprehend and most of us would freak out when faced with that. As Atreyu approaches the gate in the middle of a blizzard, which is another of those logical leaps (how far has he walked already?), he sees his reflection only for it to fade into an image of Bastian in the attic reading the book! It really goes back to the core idea that Atreyu and Bastian are connected through a strong invisible bond, and in some ways Atreyu’s journey is Bastian’s journey.
Of course all this will make much more sense in the end, but we’ll get to that when we get to that. At first Bastian is freaked out by this, and I don’t blame him for that, but he keeps reading the story anyway because not only is he a kid but I imagine being a part of a fantastical story like this one is something he’s always dreamed of, and something that the movie has hinted at up until now. Atreyu passes through the mirror and makes it to the Southern Oracle which is just a color shifted version of the Sphinx Gate from before. They even reuse the exact same shots from the previous Sphinx Gate scene.
What the Southern Oracle tells Atreyu is that to cure the Empress, she needs a new name. Not really sure how that cures dying, but okay. Also, the name has to be given to her by a human child from beyond the boundaries of Fantasia. This is a bit easier to take as an audience member since even Atreyu points out how weird this all sounds, but as the Southern Oracle concludes her wisdom, she begins to fall apart as she admits that she can’t hold back the power of the Nothing for much longer. So Atreyu’s job now is to find the edges of Fantasia with the help of Falkor and get in contact with a human child. In their travels they unfortunately don’t come across the edges of Fantasia, they instead come across the Nothing which whips them back and forth until Atreyu falls off Falkor’s back onto a beach which also doesn’t kill him somehow. I would probably forgive this if he still had the Auryn around his neck when he woke up since the Auryn is supposed to protect him, but when Atreyu wakes up it’s gone, so how did he survive that?
Being separated from Falkor, no one else around, and the death of his greatest companion Artax still weighing on him, Atreyu begins to wander aimlessly throughout the island until he comes across the Rock Biter. Get your tissues ready, because this scene gets me every time. The Rock Biter is lamenting the loss of his friends: Teeny Weeny, Night Hob, the Racing Snail, and the Stupid Bat since he tried to keep the Nothing from taking them away from him by holding onto them as tightly as he could, but he just couldn’t do it. The Nothing was too strong and it blew them away from him so now he’s resigned himself to sitting in this one place until the Nothing takes him away too as he blames himself for not being strong enough. For a kid’s movie, this film also has an impressive body count since each of these cute characters we come across eventually end up dying at the hands of the Nothing. That and also this is a particularly adult moment dealing with complex emotions and survivor’s remorse. If you’re not crying right now the Rock Biter will do it for you.
Atreyu leaves the Rock Biter to his chosen fate and he wanders more until he comes across a crumbling temple where the walls are lined with painted images of his journey up until now. It’s never fully explained why or how these paintings got here and to be honest I’m not really sure it matters either. You could make the argument that since this is seemingly the last place still intact before Fantasia’s landmasses get completely destroyed, it’s probably the newest place in the boundless reaches of Fantasia, but even without a clear explanation it’s pretty cool to see this stuff. However, there’s one image Atreyu comes across that he doesn’t quite remember, and that’s one of a green-eyed wolf snarling at the viewer. Sure enough, Atreyu turns to see Gmork waiting for him in a hole in the wall where he divulges all the information he has to Atreyu.
I especially like how Gmork’s mouth is all bloody and how he tells Atreyu that he’ll have the pleasure of being Gmork’s last victim. So like I said, Gmork ends up telling Atreyu everything he knows: how Fantasia doesn’t have any boundaries, what the true nature of the Nothing is, why Fantasia is being destroyed, and why he feels the need to serve the Nothing. In one of his lines he also tells Atreyu that he was hunting him to prevent him from succeeding in his quest, although it’s unclear if Gmork truly knows if he’s actually talking to the Atreyu or not. It isn’t until Atreyu admits to Gmork that he is Atreyu that Gmork finally pounces on him and immediately dies.
Yeah, so now we go back to what I said way earlier in this review how Gmork isn’t that great of a servant. In the end he doesn’t really do much outside of pounce on Atreyu twice and the second time he went out like a birch. Ultimately you could chock this up to more movie trimmings for the sake of cutting down the runtime to a more easily digestible length. Maybe in an extended version or even an original version of the film Gmork may have had a larger role, but as is he only seems to be an excuse for more creepy imagery. Not that I don’t like creepy imagery, I love it in fact, especially in kid’s films, but at least in this case the purpose behind it doesn’t seem to be the strongest in the final product.
Either way, as the last parts of Fantasia start to crumble around Atreyu, Falkor luckily swoops to his rescue with the Auryn gripped tightly in his teeth. At this point all the land that made up this wonderful world is completely gone and no one else is living in it. That is until the Auryn guides Atreyu and Falkor back to the Ivory Tower which just so happens to still be standing amidst the broken landeroids (that’s land-asteroid). After landing at the top of the tower, Atreyu enters the Empress’ chamber (she’s played by Tami Stronach in her first role) where she’s still sitting looking like she hasn’t been sick at all. Frickin’ faker. I will give props to the costume designers though because her outfit to me is instantly iconic.
Atreyu tries to apologize for his failure and returns the Auryn to the Empress, but she’s not disappointed. In fact, Atreyu actually succeeded! She sits there ready to receive her new name which she knew had to happen to begin with, and Atreyu properly calls her out on her bull crap. Why did all of this have to happen if you already knew what needed to be done? That’s a good point there Atreyu, but the Empress lets him know that this journey needed to happen in order to make a connection with a human child. That child is Bastian, of course. Finally the entire point of the movie is made clear in these last moments, and there’s a lot here even in very little time. In fact, there are so many things you could infer from this ending, but I’ll just give my take on it since otherwise this may take way longer than necessary.
What I get out of it is that after spending so much time with any story we feel like we become a part of it ourselves, and this is literally what happens with Bastian in this final moment. We become endeared towards these characters that we’ve grown to love and this world we’ve spent so much time in to the point that it even influences our senses of character in the real world. Stories can offer us an escape from everyday troubles while giving us new and creative ways to cope with reality if executed well, and it’s this power in the movie that gives Bastian the ability to save Fantasia. Granted this is more of a surface level reading of the subtext the movie presents, but I’ll go into more detail here after a bit when more is revealed. That’s another thing I like about this movie: just how layered it is in its ideas.
Bastian goes back and forth on if the Empress and Atreyu are actually referring to him when they talk about the human child until Atreyu collapses on the floor. Now that I’m older I like to believe that Atreyu dies in this moment by being hit with falling debris as the tower crumbles around him, because at this point it makes everything seem so much more urgent and intense. It’s now that the Empress turns directly into the camera and addresses Bastian by name to call out her new name and save Fantasia. After a bit more back and forth, Bastian goes to the attic window, opens it up, faces the thunderstorm currently raging outside and calls out:
After so many years I still can’t for the life of me figure out what the heck he says here. I always heard ‘Baltheo’ as a kid which I’m pretty sure isn’t even a name and is certainly not a name I would give the Empress or Bastian’s mother if it is. I think the point is for the name he gives the Empress to be open to interpretation, but couldn’t they have had him say something that actually sounded like a name?
Anyway, it’s at this point that Fantasia is entirely destroyed with the exception of one grain of sand which the Empress offers to Bastian, because by calling out her name Bastian manifested himself into what’s left of Fantasia. I always really liked this exchange too:
The Empress tells Bastian that he can rebuild Fantasia any way that he wants with this grain of sand by making wishes. He gets to wish to his heart’s content which looking back is way too much power for one person! It’s also at this point that you could infer that Coreander essentially made Fantasia into what it was before until he passed the story onto Bastian. To me, this is also what makes this truly the ‘NeverEnding Story’. Much like great orations of the past, it’s something that’s passed down from person to person, is constantly changing, yet remains timeless and inspired through the ages. So while owners of the book may come and go as time passes, the book, and by extension the story, never ends. Also you could make the argument that the crisis of the Nothing was merely created on account of the story changing hands and representing the new owner’s deepest fears. The movie mentions earlier that the Nothing was created since humanity started to lose hope. Then again, when I say ‘the movie’ I mean Gmork, so he could’ve been somewhat bending the truth to kill Atreyu’s optimism for saving Fantasia. This is what leads me to believe that the occurrences of the story are more of a reflection of the person who currently owns the book which was also represented in other moments before like with Atreyu’s appearance, Atreyu’s encounter with the Magic Mirror Gate, and even the appearance of the Empress could’ve been influenced by Bastian as well. Like I said before, there are so many different things you can infer from this story’s ending and I just don’t have all the time in the world to go over them. That’s why I have comments!
Anyway, with the sudden ability to wish for anything he wants, Bastian makes the wish to bring every character back to the way they were, and of course he gets to ride on Falkor because who wouldn’t want to do that? Someone who’s afraid of heights, that’s who. Bastian also gets his revenge on the bullies from before by scaring them into the dumpster he got thrown into at the beginning of the movie. As Falkor flies away we pan up to the city skyline as a narrator explains that Bastian had many adventures after this with all the wishes he made which is admittedly a bit of an awkward way to officially end this movie, but I still think it’s awesome!
Looking back on this film so many years later, and having broken it down as methodically as this, only makes me appreciate it that much more. The creativity is bursting through the screens, the story is engaging, the characters are so likable, and the message is something that will surely never die. It’s genuinely baffling to me just how few people my age have seen, or even heard, of this movie. Not only is it baffling, it’s also disappointing considering how films from studios like Illumination or Blue Sky have become so popular in this day and age while truly challenging and artistically pleasing kid’s films like The NeverEnding Story aren’t given so much as a second glance. Even with some of the issues I mentioned that I had with the film in this review, they by no means take away from the great aspects of this wonderful movie.
I’ve also heard talk recently about the prospects of a reboot to this film being released sometime this year, and I’m kinda torn on that idea. Given the core ideas that are being represented in the movie, I think a reboot could potentially breathe new life into this material while still keeping to the original message of the story, but at the same time I can’t help but wonder if the main reason this idea is being considered is just for 80’s nostalgia exploitation and nothing else. If the reboot is going to work, I’d like to see an aging Bastian pass the book onto another wide-eyed dreamer child of today who’s own unique outlook on being young in modern day influences the story they read in the book and the journey they go through results in a complex commentary of current reality which allows them to grow as a person and us as the audience to become attached to them just as we’ve grown attached to Bastian in the past. I can speculate, but in the end, only time will tell. Not in the case of the original NeverEnding Story though, because in this case, time has told.
If you’re in need of a magical/fantastical adventure through a world of wonder and discovery this weekend movie night, look no further then The NeverEnding Story!
Given my opinion of this film, I feel obligated to rate it as a 4.5/5 Barnes & Nobles (that’s the plural of Barnes & Noble, I’m not one of those people who needlessly pluralizes things). To be real, and much like my Avatar: The Last Airbender review, I feel tempted to give it a 5/5, but I can’t quite go that far. The story is still amazing, to put it in context the rating is more of a 4.8 to 4.9/5 (I’m just calling it a 4.5/5 for simplicity’s sake), but much like how I mentioned previously in the review, there are still a few issues that keep me from giving it full marks.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Beauty and the Beast
Tale as old as time, first animated film nominated for a best picture Oscar, this is one for the Disney vault! Remember when that was a thing?
I don’t know why, I guess I’m on my Disney right now. Either way, this film might actually be one of my favorite classic Disney animated films. Being the first ever animated film to be nominated for a best picture Oscar, I think it’s safe to say that I’m not the only one. Sure it came out during the Disney Renaissance and not in the early days of the studio to necessarily be considered a classic in that sense, I still think it’s deserving of a lot of praise even 33 years after its release. From great hand-drawn animation, lovable characters, fantastic songs, and a tale as old as time, this movie really does have many things to appreciate in it. Not only that but several layers to it that most kids may not pick up on at first (namely me as a kid), but adults can respect and enjoy all the more.
To put it in a different light, I’ll tell you that my first time re-watching this movie for the sake of this review I was actually playing a game while I had the movie on in the background. Usually I at least like to do something like this so I can give myself a bit of a ‘refresher’ so to speak before I start analyzing the content. However, about one third of the way into the film, I actually turned my game off and opted to watch the movie straight up. Clearly the movie is doing something right if it got a Gen Z’er like myself to turn away from my video-game to sit down and stare at a screen for an hour and a half. I want to keep this intro relatively short since I’m sure most people reading this already know this movie fairly well, but maybe we’ll all discover some things we didn’t notice when we were kids watching this movie. Let’s find out together!
Remember to give your roses plenty of sun and show some respect for your local kooky inventor, because this is Beauty and the Beast!
We open on some gorgeous shots of this castle where we’re instantly introduced to the genre of film that we’re watching as a narrator begins talking with his first words being “Once upon a time.” As soon as he says those words, heck, even when you see the hand drawn shots of the castle you know exactly what kind of movie you’re watching. This is going to be a classic fairy tale as retold by Disney which of course is going to be much brighter in tone than the original source material. There are definitely moments of that in the movie where it leans pretty heavily into humor and lightheartedness, but I think that despite being a Disney-fied version of the original story, it does still have dark moments in it which make me appreciate it more.
Either way the narrator gives us the backstory, which is cleverly only a few minutes long, about how a selfish prince who tried to turn an old woman away from his castle for being too ugly gets turned into a beast since the old woman was actually an enchantress the whole time. Also she’s hot. I mean it’s a bit hard to tell given the stained glass artwork, but they say she’s beautiful so she’s beautiful. She gives him a rose and if he can’t learn to love and be loved in return by another before the rose dies, he’ll stay a beast forever. This also brings up one thing that most people who’ve seen this movie point out as a plot hole: why did everyone in the village forget the castle existed? Clearly it was a prosperous kingdom before this happened, so you’d think the castle that’s a horse’s ride away from the town Belle lives in would be hard to forget about, but I ultimately give it some leeway considering the fact that it is a fairy tale.
Sure I could nitpick aspects like that, which there’s another one I’d like to discuss when it comes up, but this is still the same movie where the magic hot chick turns a prince into a monster only Deviantart could love and the rest of his staff into furniture, silverware, and cooking tools. Clearly this setup isn’t trying to be the most logical. Also, considering the story they’re working with, it’s surprising they got it to be as believable as it is, even when accounting for that detail. It’s at this point that we cut to our protagonist Belle ‘Last Name Unknown’ (played by Paige O’Hara) in her little town full of little people who love to wake up and say: “What, you thought this wasn’t a musical?”
Honestly, a lot of the songs in this are pretty great. Of course this first song titled 'Belle’ is very hummable and gives us a lot of insight on the town, who Belle is, why she doesn’t fit in, and the kind of person Gaston is (played by Richard White). We all know the titular song ‘Beauty and the Beast’ played later as well as ‘Be Our Guest’, but even the smaller song that’s only meant to be a transitional aid during the romantic development, ‘Something There’, is decent in its own right being sung well, orchestrated nicely, and animated playfully. One thing I especially enjoy about ‘Belle’ is that the song more or less foreshadows what would likely attract her to the Beast. She mentions in the library how her favorite book involves magic spells and a prince in disguise while she sings to the sheep by the fountain about how her favorite part of the book is when the princess meets the prince but doesn’t realize it’s him until later. Another thing I enjoy in this sequence is how Gaston isn’t introduced as a straight up villain like Maleficent, the Evil Queen, or Claude Frollo. When we first see him he’s just kind of an ass and only throughout the events of the movie we see how cruel he can be.
On that note, he and his buddy LeFou (played by Jesse Corti) laugh a bit too hard at Belle’s father’s latest inventing mistakes causing Belle to scold them and run off to help him. Her father Maurice (played by Rex Everhart) is just tuning up his biggest project yet but has hit a bit of a snag until Belle comes in to give him a pep talk. Sure enough that’s all he needed because he gets his wood chopper fixed allowing him to bring it to the fair so he can win an award and become a world famous inventor. However he ends up getting lost on his way which is what leads him to the castle. Not before setting up the wolves that’ll chase Belle later. Here’s where I’d like to mention that I feel like the pacing in this movie is spot on. It never feels like any of the moments here are pointless or aren’t progressing the story, all of the scenes in this film are needed for the purposes of telling the story, setting up the characters, developing those characters, creating tension, and building chemistry between our leads. By the time Maurice makes it to the castle and is introduced to Lumiere and Cogsworth (played by Jerry Orbach and David Ogden Stiers) only 15 minutes have passed.
Despite being only an hour and a half long movie, it in no way feels rushed or cut down even when comparing the extended cut to the original theatrical release. The only difference between these two versions is the inclusion/exclusion of the ‘Human Again’ song sung by the castle staff when they’re preparing the castle for Belle’s and Beast’s big night together. Even without the inclusion of that song it’s so well edited that you could assume that’s how the film was always intended to be watched. I could tell only because I only ever watched the extended cut on DVD as a kid while they only have the original theatrical release available on Disney+. Personally I prefer the extended cut including the ‘Human Again’ song because I really enjoy getting to see more of the staff, how they interact with each other, and watching them do their jobs along with the ‘Be Our Guest’ sequence.
All that aside, Maurice is welcomed warmly by the castle’s staff with the exception of Cogsworth who’s constantly worried about what’ll happen to him at the hands of the Beast and uptight about everything which is pretty funny. That along with the contrast between his and Lumiere’s character who’s more outgoing, friendly, and proud of his work makes Cogsworth even funnier. Even with being introduced to characters like Mrs. Potts (played by Angela Lansbury) and her son Chip (played by Bradley Pierce), this can’t save us from the wrath of the Beast (played by Robby Benson) who enters and is not happy with anything that’s going on. His entrance, despite having already seen what he looks like earlier in the intro, is still pretty intimidating with the animation, music, and voice work that accompanies it. We also get the perfect idea of what he’s like in these few moments.
While he may seem unnecessarily cruel (which he is) in this scene where he ends up throwing Maurice in a cell in the prisoner tower, you can totally understand why he’d be like this. In ‘Be Our Guest’ one of the lyrics mentions how they’ve been cursed for 10 years at this point. We’ve also learned from the intro that the Enchantress intended for the curse’s cut-off time to be during the year the Beast is 21. This means that the Beast got cursed, conservatively, when he was 11 years old! Not only has he been like this for an inordinate amount of time, but this happened to him when he was only a kid, so it kinda makes you wonder what the motives of the Enchantress were. Given this information you can reasonably assume that the Beast is essentially a terrified child trying to live with the reality of his situation as best he can, but also that since it’s been as long as it’s been he’s just resigned himself to the ‘beast lifestyle’ on account of it being so close to the time when the curse’s cut-off time is said to be. I don’t agree with his decision to lock Maurice up, but what I’m saying is I understand why he would do it.
After this scene we cut back to the village where Gaston is attempting to propose to Belle. Kinda weird he hasn’t proposed to her yet but he’s still invited the entire town, procured a band, set up seats, gotten food prepared, and more given he doesn’t know what her answer is going to be. During this sequence as Gaston enters Belle’s house we see how much of a creeper he can be as he consistently backs Belle into corners trying to prevent her from saying no to him until she cleverly kicks him out into a mud puddle. It’s here we also see his cruelness emerge as he angrily says to LeFou that Belle will be his wife and storms off covered in mud. Meanwhile Belle is pissed Gaston would even present the idea of them getting married so she runs to her backyard and sings her frustration away until Maurice’s horse Philippe (played by Hal Smith) runs up to her worried about his master. Belle instantly understanding that something is wrong takes Philippe back to where he left Maurice.
We make our way back to the castle and we see Belle get steadily led to the location of her father by Lumiere and Cogsworth where she also comes in contact with the Beast for the first time. This sequence is probably one of the most emotionally intricate of the film as we see Belle think for a moment before she proposes that the Beast let Maurice go and take her instead, the Beast hear’s her proposal and thinks for a moment about what this could mean for him while also being stunned by Belle’s altruism and love for her father. After the Beast sends Maurice off, we come back to the tower to see Belle crying about how she didn’t get to say goodbye to her father which causes the Beast to feel a twinge of guilt. Spurred on by Lumiere’s suggestion of giving Belle a better room he invites her to come follow him while still being ill-tempered and domineering. Also Belle’s reaction to this suggestion is pretty funny too. In the process of leading Belle to her new room he sees her crying silently to herself and tries again to be hospitable by allowing her to go wherever she wants in the castle except the west wing. She tries to ask him why, but he cuts her off quickly and suspiciously establishing that he has an uncomfortable connection to it. Once in Belle’s new room the Beast invites her to dinner in his beastly way before slamming the door in her face causing the weight of Belle’s decision to finally hit her in this moment where she collapses on her new bed and sobs her eyes out.
I know I spent a lot of time breaking down that previous scene, but it really does get a lot of information across in very little time and mostly just through the animation and voice work. It’s this kind of storytelling that really gets me engrossed and also makes this film one of my favorites of the classic Disney lineup. However, back in town Gaston is upset after being rejected by Belle so LeFou sings a nice little song to cheer him up, literally called ‘Gaston’. Once again we see how Gaston, while not the most conniving or cunning type of villain, at least has his physical strength and intimidation factor that makes him a worthy one among other Disney villains. ‘Gaston’ as a song is really funny and playful while also being mildly disturbing.
During this sequence we see Maurice burst in screaming for someone to help him rescue Belle from the Beast. Everyone there doesn’t believe he actually saw a beast though so they boot him out which is when Gaston hatches an idea. We’ll see this come back into play later, but I’ll save that for later as well. Back at the castle, the Beast is waiting for Belle to come down for dinner while Lumiere and Mrs. Potts give him a crash course on being a gentleman. Probably one of my favorite things about the Beast is that while he’s rough around the edges on the outside, he’s still a pretty big dork on the inside which gets some pretty good laughs out of me whenever I see this scene. Cogsworth comes down though and tells the Beast Belle isn’t coming which is what causes Beast to lose it and run upstairs to Belle’s room. They get into a heated argument and while this scene is mostly uncomfortable it’s also pretty funny with how the Beast tries to calm himself down and be polite. In the end the Beast says Belle won’t eat if she doesn’t eat with him. Not long after this encounter though, Belle sneaks out of her room ready to eat and the staff, except Cogsworth, fix her a dinner which starts off the showstopping song: ‘Be Our Guest’.
Much like the first time you saw this scene, it’s still just as fun and visually stunning as you remember it. It serves as a much needed levity after a lot of the tense/uncomfortable scenes we’ve seen before it and is what most people take away from the movie after seeing it. One thing I should add is that this sequence along with the ‘Beauty and the Beast’ sequence later has a few moments of early 90’s CG that can be a bit dated, but it’s not really the focus and is often in the background which makes it easier to overlook as the stellar hand-drawn animation is still at the center of both of them. With dinner finished, Belle convinces Cogsworth to give her a tour of the castle which she uses as an excuse to sneak into the west wing where we see why the Beast was so adamant about Belle not going in it. Sure we’ve seen this place a couple times in the movie already, but it’s obvious that this is where the Beast goes to be a tortured soul since everything is destroyed and ravaged, so it serves as a jarring moment for the audience. Paintings are torn, furniture strewn about, cobwebs everywhere, with the only thing untouched being the enchanted rose. Belle tries to get a closer look but that’s when the Beast comes in and doesn’t take her being there well.
This results in Belle leaving. Yeah, she just straight up leaves. I like how they have this romantic progression seem so believable because I know I wouldn’t want to stay after something like this either. Also the Beast told her to get out, so she’s at least following directions. She hops on Philippe, because he was so nice to wait there for her the whole time, and she tries to get back home only to be stopped by the wolves from earlier. It looks like she might be done for until the Beast shows up and fights off the wolves. Before Belle ran out, we saw a brief moment of the Beast back in the west wing after yelling at her where he looks guilty for what he did. This also comes back into play later in the movie which I think is pretty clever showing more growth on his part. Him coming to rescue her was probably the Beast realizing that Belle is his last hope for becoming human so he has to do what he can to make her like him. Once the wolves are gone we catch a glimpse of blood in a G-rated movie before the Beast passes out and Belle has a change of heart after seeing him rescue her like that. She takes him back to the castle to mend his wounds and they both have another argument. Belle wins this time and thanks the Beast for saving her which causes his demeanor to soften again and officially begins their romantic development.
Meanwhile we pick up again with Gaston where he’s bribing the head of the local insane asylum Monsieur D’Arque (played by Judge Claude Frollo himself: Tony Jay) to take Maurice away unless Belle agrees to marry him. Most of this scene is just setting up for the third act when Belle returns home, but it also does give us a better idea of how manipulative he is which puts him more squarely in the Disney villain category. Maurice also sets out on his own to bring Belle back himself, but it looks like Gaston and LeFou just missed him. Since neither Belle nor Maurice are home Gaston tells LeFou to stay outside their house until they get back. Like I said, mostly set up for the third act, but at least it doesn’t last very long. Then back with Belle and the Beast we see them start to bond which also leads me to the other main thing I wanted to discuss about this movie that most people mention: Stockholm Syndrome.
Stockholm Syndrome is a phenomenon that can occur between captor and prisoner in the real world where the prisoner becomes emotionally connected to their captor to the point they feel the need to assist them in their objective. I personally don’t think that’s what’s happening here in the movie. While yes Belle is technically the Beast’s prisoner, Stockholm Syndrome happens when prisoners are made aware of the captor’s demands, but Belle never finds out that the Beast needs to fall in love and she has to fall in love with him as well in order to break the spell. If she did know that she may not have left the Beast later in the movie to save Maurice when he was in trouble. That and the Beast actually sacrifices his own objective later in the movie for the sake of showing someone he cares about true kindness and love even if that love isn’t reciprocated. In typical instances of Stockholm Syndrome you wouldn’t see this sort of complex emotional growth take place with the prisoner and the captor. This is why this movie doesn’t really fit the example of Stockholm Syndrome most people mention to me. Not even the remake. The remake comes closer to true Stockholm Syndrome than the original, but I still wouldn’t call it a good example. Either way, that’s also a discussion for a different day.
I should also mention as well that in these scenes of Belle and Beast getting to know each other we actually hear Beast sing. I’m not really sure how I feel about this. Not to say that his singing is bad, not at all, I’m just not really sure it’s a good fit for his character. I know they’re emphasizing that he’s learning and growing as a person in these moments, but I wouldn’t think he would be to the point where he would feel comfortable singing yet, even if it’s just in his head. Like most things that I’m uncertain about when it comes to this movie though, it at least doesn’t last that long.
We naturally come to the most iconic portion of the movie with Belle and the Beast in the ballroom. Before that we catch a few moments of the Beast preparing with Lumiere which is both cute and funny. Then we see Belle and the Beast meet up on the stairway, they eat together, the Beast finally learns how to use a spoon, they head to the ballroom, before they dance the Beast looks visibly nervous, then they dance to Mrs. Potts’ rendition of ‘Beauty and the Beast’, and they soften in each other’s arms cementing their newfound relationship together. An iconic moment mostly because this is the culmination of all the romantic tension that’s been building between these two over the past few scenes of them getting familiar with each other. It’s adequately built up, visually interesting, heartwarming, and genuine. However, Belle remembers her father and starts to feel upset. That’s when the Beast tells her about the mirror that he has that can show him anything. Belle uses it to see her father which is when she finds out he’s not in good shape trying to look for her. She’s freaking out about how he might die, so Beast thinks for a moment, looks at the dying rose, grimaces, and tells her she can leave to save him while choking back tears. It’s a very emotional moment and you feel for the Beast knowing that he’s giving up so much and now he’ll never get the chance to become human again. Knowing Disney, of course that’s not going to stick, but for the time being it’s done well.
After rescuing her father Belle returns home with him, LeFou rings for the asylum keepers, and Chip has mysteriously stowed away in Belle’s bag. I’m not really sure how he managed to do that, but since this is the only hastily written moment to keep the runtime down, I’ll take it. Monsieur D’Arque, LeFou, Gaston, and the rest of the town appear at the door and try to take Maurice away for making up beasts, but Belle stops them by showing the Beast through the mirror. This gets Gaston to rile up the townspeople to kill the Beast to protect the village and I’ll never watch this scene the same way again. Not because it’s violent and intense, but because I learned that to save on animation the animators replaced full scenes of the townspeople marching to the castle gates with shots of weapons being held aloft and brief moments of shadows being cast on trees. Disney animators are really talented, but they can also be pretty lazy. Of course Gaston and the town lock Maurice and Belle in their home cellar and of course Chip rescues them using Maurice’s wood chopper machine which I still have no idea how he managed to get it working, but whatever.
Once inside the castle the furniture attacks the invaders, giving Disney another comedic climax alongside all the other comedic climaxes they had at this point in their existence, while Gaston goes after the Beast himself. I also like how we see that the furniture are doing their best to prevent the castle from being overrun while the Beast has completely given up. When I was younger I didn’t understand why the Beast just let the invaders into the castle, but now that I’m older I totally get it. At this point he thinks Belle has left him and no one else will never love him like she did, so he’s completely given up now. Not only that, but Gaston’s character in this scene makes a lot more sense to me too. We saw earlier in the movie how he’s basically just a hunter, and that paired with the fact that he’s (correctly) assuming that Belle has a thing for the Beast is what makes him want to take him down personally. Both for the sake of winning Belle’s affection, and for the purposes of mounting a one of a kind beast’s head on his wall among the rest of his kills.
When Gaston fights the Beast, he doesn’t fight back until he sees Belle on the castle bridge which restores his will to live. Another thing most of us are probably familiar with here is how when Gaston backs the Beast into a corner and says “Belle is mine!”, that wasn’t the original line. Gaston was originally supposed to say “Time to die!”, but the writer decided to change the line to circle it all back around to Belle. At this point though the line was already animated, so his lips still say “Time to die!” in the movie even though his voice says “Belle is mine!”. While the Beast gets an opportunity to kill Gaston himself, he doesn’t take it and instead gives us this clever call back:
He chooses not to kill Gaston cementing his choice to be a human and shows further character growth by not yelling like he did to Belle earlier in the movie. When the Beast sees Belle on the balcony he climbs up to see her until Gaston literally stabs him in the back giving us even more blood in a G-movie! Gaston should’ve watched his footing though because his klutziness results in him falling to his death. Also, I know this isn’t the most gruesome Disney villain death in history (and this isn’t the first Disney villain to fall to their death), but something about it still makes me uncomfortable, mostly with this brief moment as he falls:
Yeah, in case you thought he might survive, the animators are like “Grow up, you know he’s dead!” Belle pulls Beast up onto the balcony and he slowly succumbs to his wounds. Although, Belle professes her love to him right before the last petal falls which means the spell is broken. The Beast is lifted into the air and slowly transforms into:
So, kinda like with the mob marching to the castle, I think they probably just didn’t have enough time to think out this design that much when compared to his beast form, so yeah the end result is a little weird, but he at least does look different when compared to the rest of the Disney princes. Also, let’s be real, most of the other Disney princes look kinda the same, so this is at least something different.
Anyway, the rest of the staff are returned to their human forms, even the dog footstool gets turned back into a dog which is kinda disappointing for me because I think I actually preferred the footstool dog, and we wrap up one of my favorite classic Disney fairy tales.
There are so many things I realized watching this movie again after so many years, and let me tell you I appreciate it so much more now that I’m older. While yes it is still clearly a film primarily intended for children, it still has many elements that adults can enjoy as well which any great kid’s film should have. Of course there’s nothing wrong with writing material that’s intended solely for children, but I always find myself remembering these sorts of movies that appeal to people of all ages far into the future while purely kid’s media I forget relatively quickly as I age. I really miss this style of hand-drawn animation in modern films and it’s done to spectacular effect here along with the clever storytelling, the great characters, and amazing songs.
One day I’d love to see another movie come out that’s done in a hand-drawn style, whether it be from Disney or some other company, big or small. I really would’ve loved to see that with something like Wish, but I’m getting sidetracked. Whether you grew up with this material or not, whether you’ve seen it or not, by all means pop it in this weekend for your movie night and enjoy the classic tale as old as time.
I myself would give this film a rating of 4.5/5 roses since there are still a couple things I noticed that are a bit weird here, some I even mentioned previous, but if you can look past all that, it really is worth it.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
WALL-E
Out there is a world outside of Yonkers so I’ve heard. This movie proves that that’s true by giving us an unforgettable space adventure, so blast off with me into WALL-E!
So here we are with a 2008 film that reminds us the only things that’ll survive after the apocalypse are cockroaches, Twinkies, robots, and…Hello, Dolly? WALL-E everybody!
Despite what that opening sentence might suggest, I actually like this movie. I think it can be very visually stimulating with cute and lovable characters and a message that’s surprisingly optimistic for a movie of its kind. For what it is, it’s quaint, content, and satisfying to watch so long as you don’t read too much into it. That’s where I come in! Even with my tendency to over-analyze things nowadays I can’t say I find too many issues with this movie that would be grounds for calling it bad. Of course there are a few things I’ve noticed over the years, and I will be discussing them today, but at least it’ll be a fun journey this time.
Being what’s essentially 2001: A Space Odyssey for kids (I know that movie is rated PG, I mean little kids) it has plenty of creativity, humor, and passion for anyone of any age to enjoy even with very little dialogue. Considering what I’ve already written so far would probably be enough to fill half this movie’s script dialogue already, let’s just get right into it.
Put on your Sunday clothes and pick up your boot plant, this is Pixar’s WALL-E!
As the movie opens, the song ‘Put On Your Sunday Clothes’ from Hello, Dolly! plays and we zoom in on a horribly polluted planet Earth where there is a thick cloud of satellites surrounding the planet and there are stacks of garbage as tall as skyscrapers. We eventually find out that the source of the music is our protagonist: the Waste Allocation Load Lifter - Earth class, or WALL-E for short. He’s voiced by sound engineering/design legend Ben Burtt and I’m using the word ‘voiced’ so charitably that I should be able to write it off as a charitable donation on my taxes. Not to say that he does a poor job voicing the character, but, as mentioned before, there’s hardly any dialogue in this movie. When factoring in dialogue from every credited character excluding song lyrics, the word count comes out to be around 1,700 by my rough counting, which, if you’re familiar with standard word counts for films, is hardly anything. Also yes, I counted. I probably didn’t have to, but I did anyway. I’m so extra.
Regardless of spoken dialogue, this intro showing us how WALL-E’s world works and what his character is like is about as pitch-perfect visual storytelling as you can get. You instantly understand what he does, why he does it, the kind of character he is, how he’s survived as long as he has, and how relatable he is. Since I just last week finished reviewing all the Indiana Jones movies, I feel compelled to compare this intro to Raiders of the Lost Ark in the sense that they both serve their purposes astoundingly well for setting up their protagonists. Of course this movie intro isn’t anywhere near as iconic as that film’s intro, it does still serve its purpose well and treats kids more maturely than they typically are with many other ‘modern’ types of kid’s media. While most of the set pieces and shots are monochromatic, drab, and unpleasant for this opening, that’s also to get across the grittiness of the environment WALL-E works in and creates contrast for the eventual arrival of the probe. I know her name, I’m just waiting until she actually shows up to mention it.
After the introduction of WALL-E’s special friend, a cockroach named Twinkie by the creators, and a private viewing of Hello, Dolly!, we see WALL-E come across a plant while working in the field one day which he ends up putting in a boot that he found. That may not seem important now, but it’ll be the main focus of the movie eventually. On his way home, WALL-E comes across a red dot which he follows to a ship’s landing site where they unload the Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator, or EVE probe (played by Elissa Knight). Right off the bat I love how they have a stark contrast between WALL-E and EVE because just seeing these two side-by-side is pretty interesting. Honestly looking at the poster with these two next to each other just sparks so many creative possibilities. One thing that is a bit confusing is how these robots managed to develop a personality in the first place, though.
We see when EVE is delivered on the planet’s surface she at first gets straight to work until her ship leaves which prompts her to blast off and have a bit of fun. With WALL-E you could assume that his personality is more or less a malfunction in his programming from being active for as long as he has, but EVE seems new. Like brand new. At least based off her look. So how was she able to develop a personality? I suppose you could infer that their personalities in some way stem from their original programming, but it is a bit glossed over. Besides that, we see EVE start to roam the place and WALL-E immediately fall in love with her per what we saw with him and the ‘It Only Takes A Moment’ clip and he tries his best to get her attention. At first I didn’t really like that they were doing a love story since I wasn’t sure if this was the kind of story I wanted to see that in, but the more I thought about it, the more it made sense to me. WALL-E has been by himself for an unbelievably long time and the film has already clearly established that he’s both lonely and longing for some kind of relationship with another…being, so this does seem to be the next logical step for his story to take. The film didn’t restore my hope in this direction when it did the clichéd ‘trying to get crush’s attention going horribly wrong’ gag after this idea was presented, but it’s at least short and painless. Not for WALL-E though. For him it’s super painful.
However, something I do like about EVE’s arrival is how we see her scan things over and over. She’s constantly scanning and scanning, but we don’t know what she’s looking for and she can’t seem to find it which helps create intrigue and a bit of mystery. That is until she gets uncomfortably close to a ship’s magnet crane though. She shows it who’s boss.
This is when WALL-E musters up enough courage to ask EVE out on a da- I mean approach her and introduce himself. They get acquainted just before a dust storm hits and WALL-E leads EVE to safety in his house of knickknacks. She has a hard time understanding a lot of what she sees which I think is also a bit nice showing how EVE isn’t well-versed on Earth things while WALL-E isn’t well versed on Axiom things which gets both of them into trouble later. EVE warms up to WALL-E’s personality even if she only likes him as a friend (for now) until WALL-E shows off the plant he found. EVE scans it as she’s scanned everything up until now only to show both herself and the audience that that is in fact what she’s been looking for. She has a robo-seizure, absorbs the plant into her plant-holder chest cavity thing, and shuts down, blacking out all the power in WALL-E’s house. What happens next is more rom-com level stuff of WALL-E trying to look after EVE while she’s shut down, and while it’s not as funny as most of the other humor in this movie, it does at least serve more of a purpose than the previous rom-com level humor we saw with him trying to get her attention.
At least with this brief comedic sequence, while it’s not very funny, it does at least play a role later in the movie in helping EVE and WALL-E grow closer since EVE sees how much WALL-E cares about her. Granted if these characters were human this would be a horror film, but I digress. It seems no amount of love WALL-E gives to the unconscious EVE is enough to wake her up so he goes back to work, defeated. Soon after he starts though, the ship returns to pick EVE up again which begs the question: why did the ship leave in the first place? It was coming right back, so why not just stay on Earth until EVE combed the whole planet to save on fuel? Anyway, WALL-E leaves his good friend Twinkie behind and climbs aboard the side of the ship riding it all the way into space. Of course if this were more realistic WALL-E’s arms probably would’ve fallen off before he made it into space, but since this is animated I give it a pass. Not only that, but it leads to some of my favorite visuals in the movie.
These shots are just gorgeous and completely revel in the majesty of outer space which is something I would want to see from a sci-fi adventure film. They don’t last for very long but I always find myself loving every moment of them whenever I see them despite the fact that they don’t serve much narrative purpose. More than anything their job is to establish everything WALL-E’s been missing being stuck on Earth all this time, and while we’re marveling at the visuals, so is he. He’s finally having that adventure he’s been wanting to have for what’s likely centuries, which also makes him more relatable as a character in this moment seeing how his dreams and desires coincide with ours as the audience. It doesn’t last forever though as the ship finally returns to its base on the Axiom where we’ll be spending almost the entire rest of this movie.
Like I said before, we had EVE as the fish out of water back on Earth, but now we have WALL-E as the fish out of water on the Axiom which serves as a nice contrast as well. As EVE is unloaded and prepped for scanning we’re also introduced to the cleaning-bot M-O (also played by Ben Burtt) and his crew of maintenance bots which I should mention is pretty clever as well. What I like about them is how we see such a wide variety of robots on the ship and what their functions are supposed to be before we’re transferred to the Repair Ward later where we see the malfunctioning versions of those same robots which can be kinda funny, but also strangely feels like character development as well. After EVE is prepped, the protocol robot GO-4 scans her and senses she has the plant inside her which sets off an alarm causing the robots to strap her to a hovercraft and send her straight to the captain’s quarters. WALL-E follows close behind leaving a trail of dirt in his wake prompting M-O the cleaning-bot to chase after WALL-E throughout the rest of the movie cleaning up his mess which is pretty funny. My one gripe about this is that for the majority of the movie we actually don’t see WALL-E actively creating a dirt trail behind him. If you pay close attention during WALL-E’s scenes from here on he doesn’t actually leave a dirt trail, it just randomly appears later when they cut back to M-O cleaning it up. I know it’s more of a nitpick, but I would’ve laughed even harder at this concept if I saw it happening in real time. However, WALL-E does follow EVE’s hovercraft to Axiom central where we get some pretty on-the-nose commentary on human life.
We see how the Axiom passengers have all voluntarily confined themselves to their hover-chairs where they choose to be wired into technology 24/7 all the while getting fatter and lazier. You could make the argument that this is a somewhat painful commentary seeing just how obviously it is commentary, but you could also write several term papers explaining how poignant it is to modern society even 16 years after this film’s release, so in a way it kinda comes around full circle. To me I think it works because it ties into the central message of the film and also plays a role in the development of not just the side characters of this story, but also the development of the human race in the film. That’s my biggest thing about commentary in films is that if you’re going to have commentary, at least have it tie into the themes of the story so it can create a thoughtful discussion on the subject you’re commenting on after the credits roll. Of course even with films like this it can still come across as heavy-handed, but I really think this movie does a good job of it.
Anyway, WALL-E, in the process of following EVE to the captain’s quarters, ends up waking up two passengers on the ship who are suddenly amazed by the wonderful world they never knew they lived in up until now. Okay, at this point this movie is 2 seconds away from turning into Look Up. Luckily it cuts back to the main characters at this point where we’re introduced to Captain B. McCrea (played by Jeff Garlin) who goes about his day as normal until his autopilot (played by the text-to-speech program MacInTalk) tells him about how EVE has returned ‘positive’ (because she found the plant). I like in this sequence how we not only see that Captain McCrea secretly longs for a more fulfilling life since he grumbles at AUTO for not waking him up sooner to do morning announcements for the ship, but that as soon as he sees EVE has returned positive, he’s just as scared as any other passenger of the prospect of everyone going back to Earth. It’s something new, exciting, yet anxiety inducing since it could go horribly wrong, and Captain McCrea reacts accordingly to it making him a more interesting character as we see his attitude change over the course of the film.
Before I continue I’d also like to mention the genius of having AUTO be played by a text-to-speech program. I know I’m dwelling a bit, but watching this movie after so many years, I’ve really learned to appreciate how many layers it has. The filmmakers are clearly aware that they’re never going to get a haunting performance quite like Douglas Rain’s as HAL-9000 from 2001 with AUTO obviously being their HAL stand-in, so they just decide to make him a complete robot. It also speaks to his character that each of the other robots in the movie are played by human actors such as WALL-E and EVE, but those robots actually have a personality. Having AUTO be a total machine with a mechanical voice also speaks to his stubbornness and possibly even his ‘choice’ to remain an emotionless piece of metal as opposed to doing what’s right in this situation like the other robots. They get across so much in this movie despite having very little dialogue.
Anyway, Captain McCrea is shown an informational video heralded by the mega corporation BNL’s CEO Shelby Forthright, which is a great name for this character by the way (played by Fred Willard), who tells the Captain what needs to happen in order to return to Earth. As soon as they get started they open EVE up to find that the plant is missing! This leads the plans for going back home to be cancelled and EVE being sent to the Repair Ward as mentioned earlier since they think she might be malfunctioning. Here we’re reintroduced to each of the extraneous robots we’ve seen throughout the ship until now, but now they’re malfunctioning and developing personalities. While EVE is getting looked at, WALL-E watches from his robot repair cell misconstruing everything that’s being done to EVE as torture which prompts him to break out and try to save her. In the process he breaks out the rest of the robots as well which gets them to praise him as a hero and parade him around the ship while EVE chases after. This whole sequence along with the other awkward moments with WALL-E and EVE back on Earth are the only moments of the movie that feel distinctly like ‘kid’s movie’ stuff to me, but at the very least they don’t last for too long and much like WALL-E’s interactions with EVE while she was out, it does at least come back into play later.
Once EVE recovers her stolen arm cannon, she decides WALL-E is too much trouble since this little outing has resulted in the Axiom robot police wanting to capture the two of them. Instead, EVE makes her way to the ship’s escape pods and plans to send him away on it. WALL-E acts like any stubborn toddler would in this situation which almost leads to their cover being blown when someone else enters the pod area. It’s GO-4 and we see he was the one who stole the plant when he scanned EVE earlier. He plans to put the plant on the pod, send it out, and have it self-destruct. Soon after he leaves WALL-E goes to recover the plant since, as we’ve established, he’s pretty naive which results in him getting shot out into space while the ship’s AI voice (played by Sigourney Weaver) counts down to his eventual destruction. I bet it felt good for Sigourney recording these lines not having to worry about herself being blown to smithereens this time.
But, thus begins my biggest problem with this movie: they tease the idea that WALL-E might die way too much. In the end they do this at least twice, if not three times and it gets old real fast. If you’re going to tease whether a character is going to die or not, you do this once. Maximum. Even then it’s still a little overplayed because more often than not when you tease the fact a character might die it ends up not happening. Most movies that do this don’t follow through with killing the character off so we know what the outcome is going to be. But doing this three times is really annoying, and since they don’t follow through on any of them it drives me up a wall-e.
Of course the pod explodes and WALL-E survives while saving the plant, so he and EVE share a cutesy frolic through space together which is almost criminally adorable. During this sequence we’re treated to even more beautiful shots of space and the movie presents the idea that the two passengers who woke up earlier named John and Mary (played by Pixar’s obligatory John Ratzenberger cameo and Kathy Najimy) might fall in love. It goes nowhere so it ends up being ultimately pointless, but while all this is going on Captain McCrea is learning more and more about Earth which plants the idea in his head to want to save it. Here’s some more of those space shots because I love it:
After acquiring the plant, EVE takes WALL-E to the nearest linen closet to hide while she delivers the plant to the Captain. Upon doing so he gets so excited he has to scan EVE’s memory to see what Earth looks like now which is a major let-down. Since he’s been looking up all this stuff about Earth he’s expecting this vibrant world, and it just isn’t that anymore. As we’ve seen it’s just barren trash-filled wasteland now and this really disappoints the Captain until he notices the plant lose a leaf which prompts him to find some water for it. While he’s gone we finally get the payoff of WALL-E’s protection of EVE while she was unresponsive, because her memory continues playing to show all the things he did for her. This causes her to feel closer to him as a result and even mimic WALL-E’s hand-holding thing he’s done a few times already. Sure the scenes from before weren’t anything that great, but at least they’re building character later on in the film which makes them feel less pointless and it is believable to say the least.
Cutting back to the Captain and the plant, he’s given it water and comes to the realization that he needs to do whatever he can to help Earth with the power he’s been given. He was initially disappointed after seeing what’s become of Earth from EVE’s memory, but after realizing what difference he can make by watering the plant, he’s accepted this responsibility and decides he’ll do everything to return Earth to its former glory. This also leads me to the main message of this movie, that it despite it being a more environmentally oriented film, it has a surprisingly optimistic tone to it. Most other movies that have focused on this sort of premise in the past have come at it from the perspective of “We’re all doomed! The end is nigh!” This one however actually takes a different approach and acknowledges that sure things may be bleak, but we have the ability to do the right thing for our homeland and take care of it for the future of life and our descendants. It’s a pretty powerful message that puts power back into the hands of the audience and reminds us that still more can be done. Rarely is that something you see with an environmental film and I love that this movie takes a different approach, because this premise desperately needed some variety.
On the other hand though, AUTO tells the Captain they can’t go back due to a second message that was sent to the ship by Shelby Forthright. Here he explains that the Axiom can’t return to Earth because life is unsustainable. Wait, but how do you account for the plant then? That’s exactly what the Captain thinks as he tries to show AUTO that the message is severely outdated and the info is no longer relevant, but AUTO isn’t budging. In the process, the Captain gives us my favorite line in this entire movie:
The Captain’s passion doesn’t seem to be getting through to AUTO and he has GO-4 come in to steal the plant instead. At first the Captain tries to get EVE to arrest GO-4 and take the plant herself, but GO-4 throws the plant down the garbage chute. Wait, the plant just floats back up? Oh, WALL-E climbed up the garbage chute to reunite with EVE and caught the plant on his head! Not so subtly hidden plot-device. AUTO tries to get the plant back, but WALL-E hides it in his garbage compactor so AUTO tries shocking WALL-E to death. Chock this up to a death tease of 2. He falls back down the garbage chute with EVE being thrown in not long after and the Captain is confined to his room. Side note: this is also where I first learned the word ‘mutiny’. When I first watched this movie, I had my parents pause the movie right here so they could explain to me what the word ‘mutiny’ meant.
Beside the point. Back in the garbage disposal area, EVE wakes up and ends up saving both herself and WALL-E before they get blown out of the airlock with the help of the cleaning-bot M-O. Yeah, he’s still been following WALL-E cleaning up his mess this entire time and he gets himself lodged in the airlock door giving EVE something to grab onto to prevent from getting launched into space. M-O cleans up WALL-E and EVE tries to find a new motherboard for WALL-E since his old one was damaged by AUTO’s shock. None of the ones she finds are compatible though so WALL-E instead gives the plant to EVE so she can follow her directive. Weirdly though, EVE is no longer interested in the plant. WALL-E gives it to her and she tosses it aside saying that WALL-E’s life is her directive now. Again, while it’s not well explained it is at least…cute. However, what WALL-E meant was that if they take the plant back to Earth they can get him fixed up there because that’s where his home with all his spare parts is. EVE agrees to this idea and takes M-O along so he can help. I like how M-O isn’t really a villain he’s just a clean freak, so when WALL-E gets all clean he decides to help him. Only when he’s all clean though which makes his character even funnier.
On their way back from the garbage disposal, they run into more police bots which they quickly dispatch of after reuniting with the malfunctioning robots from earlier. Again it makes it feel more like a self-contained story when they have these little details that come back into play like we saw before with EVE’s memory of WALL-E taking care of her. It also just makes it feel more like a movie. The Captain gets a hold of WALL-E and EVE through the ship’s comm systems and tricks AUTO into thinking he has the plant so he’ll come back into his room and he can ambush him. I have a bit of a hard time understanding that honestly. Mostly because when the Captain contacted WALL-E and EVE he told them to bring the plant to the Lido Deck which clearly indicates that he doesn’t have the plant in his possession and AUTO obviously saw it, but when he bluffs AUTO not 1 minute later, AUTO totally believes him and thinks he has the plant. Isn’t AUTO supposed to be a logically oriented machine, why would this fool him? Well we want to keep this movie to around an hour and a half long so I guess we can cut corners here a bit, but to that same end, this climax is just okay to me.
The biggest part of the climax in my opinion is when we see the Captain stand up for the first time to fight against AUTO (also because they round out the 2001 homage with ‘Also Sprach Zarathustra’), but pretty much every other part of the climax isn’t that suspenseful or heart-pounding to me. We see passengers being hover-chaired to the Lido Deck that nobody cares about and when the ship rotates on its axis causing the passengers to fall out of their chairs, that’s pretty much all we get for tension in that scene. What do they expect to happen, the ship to capsize? Did they forget they’re in space? Not only that but we get WALL-E death tease number 3 after he tries to hold up the holo-detector and prevent it from retreating back into the floor only to get himself crushed in the process. Of course they’re not going to kill him or any of these passengers so all of the scenes focusing on these characters during this climax are just…‘there’ to me. Sure the camera angles, lighting, and action are choreographed well for these scenes, but it ends up amounting to little except for those scenes between the Captain and AUTO.
Regardless, EVE puts the plant in the holo-detector and mourns the ‘loss’ of WALL-E along with the other passengers before being hyperjumped back to Earth. Upon return, EVE immediately rushes off to repair her fallen lover robot, and as she leaves, the Captain is so moved by WALL-E’s sacrifice he actually removes his hat in honor. This scene honestly gets me to laugh now! Just the idea that the movie is actually trying to trick us with the concept of WALL-E dying for the third time at this point and thinks it’s so incredibly moving that it deserves the equivalent of a fallen soldier’s salute is just hilarious to me! Of course EVE makes it back to WALL-E’s house, compiles all the necessary parts to repair him, does so, and he comes back. Hold on a minute, he’s acting kinda funny though. WALL-E doesn’t seem to be himself since EVE had to replace his motherboard and he lost his memories as a result. Yeah, this doesn’t go on for very long, but it’s both a little better and a little worse than I remember.
It’s better in the sense that considering all the buildup we had previously in the movie getting to understand WALL-E’s character, traits, and dreams, seeing him as this completely empty shell is legitimately jarring and can be difficult to watch. At the same time, it’s worse since we know it’s not going to last. Even with this movie and all the brilliance it has in it, we’re painfully aware that this isn’t going to be how the movie ends despite how much complexity that would add to the characters and their reactions to this outcome, so you just want it to end so the movie can end.
They do eventually get to that point where EVE confesses her love to WALL-E by finally holding his hand, humming WALL-E’s favorite love song (‘It Only Takes A Moment’), and resting her forehead on his creating a static spark. Through the power of love and/or static electricity this causes WALL-E’s memories to come back and happily ever after is finally achieved. There’s so much I could critique about this copout ending, but I’m sure you’re probably thinking it already. Our reject robots celebrate, the boot plant is planted, the humans recolonize, and we get to what’s probably my all-time favorite part of the movie: the credits. I know that sounds weird, but just look at how they do it:
I think this end credits sequence is the perfect culmination of everything this movie stands for from its message about love, humanity, and environmental protection. We see how humans essentially re-evolved starting from early civilizations such as ancient Egyptian culture back through history with the added bonus of having robots to help them along the way and reinventing classic art styles as well which is just beautiful. All that paired with the song ‘Down To Earth’ written by Peter Gabriel and Thomas Newman makes for a great ending. You could still nitpick and ask questions like “How did the animals come back?” but I think it’s still very satisfying to watch.
So after all that fussing about details and whatnot, do I think this is a good movie? Yes, I do. Despite those things I mentioned earlier, I still have to commend what was clearly a risky film for Pixar to make. Relying heavily on visual techniques to get across character details and story threads isn’t something you often see in children’s media since so much of it tends to be dumbed down for the sake of appealing to younger audiences. What this movie understands, unlike other films trying to do similar things, is that kids are able to pick up on more than you think. By treating kids more like adults it helps challenge children to think more critically about what they’re watching while giving them opportunities to grow and also engages the adults watching while appealing to their inner child as well which is very difficult to do. This movie, however, actually manages to pull it off in creative ways and ends up giving us a cute, rich, and unforgettable experience in the end.
Do those flaws I mentioned earlier still matter to me? Yes, but I think focusing on just the negatives is doing the film a big disservice. If you focus on only those aspects you lose sight of a film that has complex ideas, in-depth characters, beautiful visuals, and poignant commentary that’s still relevant today. However, the flaws I mentioned do keep the movie from being perfect, but I’m not sure that was really the filmmakers’ intention. If I were to describe this movie as simply as I can, I would call it ‘an experience’. Which it is. If you sit back, relax, and just let the movie take you on a journey to far unknown worlds outside of Yonkers, it really is an experience, and one I’m sure would be great to have on the big screen if they ever re-release it in theaters.
Considering the flaws I feel comfortable rating this film a 4/5 HAL-9000’s, but if I’m grading based off of the filmmakers’ intention, I have no problem giving it a 4.5/5 HAL-9000’s.
If you’re still looking for a movie for this weekend movie night, look no further than WALL-E.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
What do I even put here? It’s a movie. Yeah, that’s pretty much it. Dial of Destiny everybody: it exists.
Disclaimer:
The movie I’ll be reviewing this week is rated: PG-13
Some content in this review is unsuitable for children.
Since the previous installment, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, had left so many people uncomfortable with the prospect of another Indiana Jones sequel, it took Disney 11 years after acquiring Lucasfilm to come out with the final film in the franchise: Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. I was definitely not in a rush to see this movie much like other people who hated the fourth film, yet Disney+ still went out of its way to put in this film’s description that it’s the ‘highly anticipated final installment of the iconic franchise’. Look Disney, I want to want to see this movie as much as you want me to want to, but I just don’t. No one else does either unless they weren’t scarred for life by the last movie in the series. Despite my discomfort about this film going in, it definitely wasn’t painful to sit through like Crystal Skull, but it still was a pretty lackluster way to end this iconic series. That is definitely saying something as well considering that this film is the longest in the series clocking in at 2 hours and 37 minutes.
The way I see it, this was probably the most middle-of-the-road of any of the films in the franchise. Not great, not awful, but nothing to get excited about as Disney+ suggests, and definitely no way I would expect an iconic series like Indiana Jones to wrap things up especially since they already had a perfect ending with Crusade but they botched that up with the piece of crap I reviewed last week. Despite having a few cool moments here and there, it still doesn’t have the epic weight of adventure that the better films in the franchise had even with a time traveling climax. Yes, they go back in time in this. Although I suppose there are some noteworthy moments that are still worth talking about so we may as well go over them. Let’s finish out Indiana Jones month with his latest and mid-est eh-dventure.
Call up your goddaughter that was never mentioned until now and click your dials back to the time when this series was good, this is Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny!
So we open back in WWII era Germany, because we all know this series was surprisingly more fun when Dr. Jones was fighting Nazis, where we see some soldiers dragging a bag-headed prisoner into a fortress. They force him into a chair and rip the bag off his head to reveal:
Oh, I’m sorry, it looks like I accidentally plugged in the PS4 version of this movie. Oh, doubly sorry, these are apparently very convincing effects. What makes it even worse is that while they went out of their way to digitally de-age Harrison Ford, they kept his voice the same. So while we’re seeing an uncanny valley version of classic Indiana Jones, we’re getting the voice of current Harrison Ford and it’s super distracting. At least we don’t have to look at this face for very long.
Right?
As it turns out, this intro aside is also the longest of the series lasting nearly 30 minutes. Why did you think this would work?! Each of the other films that had these little intros to them often got in and out quickly giving you an interesting look at the iconic hero in action, keeping the adrenaline high, while also not feeling like a waste of time even if they didn’t tie into the main story. This intro weirdly has everything to do with the main story since it gives us the set up necessary to be able to follow the story later down the line, yet it astoundingly has even less impact on the story than the intros that are supposed to not have an impact on the story! That and we also have to look at that face for the entire time which is just embarrassing.
Okay, so before I go any further, let me just say I’m glad that we live in a time where we’re able to have technology like this that’s ambitious and almost magical in its ability to do things like what we see in the movies. It really has come a long way and I want effects artists to be able to experiment with what this technology is capable of. At the same time though, there are examples of other films today that have utilized this technology better. In Terminator: Dark Fate we saw a brief flashback between Sarah and John where we see John look like this:
Compared to how we previously saw the character in Terminator 2: Judgment Day:
How they did it is that they cast a new actor in the same role and brought back the original actor for the de-aging process while superimposing their face onto the new actor to create this effect all while keeping the flashback short and sweet so they didn’t have to work with these effects for too long. If in Dial of Destiny they had cut down the intro significantly more, actually recast a younger actor to be the body of Indiana Jones, and made an effort to recreate Harrison Ford’s voice I could’ve gotten behind this, but what we got is just beyond ridiculous.
Anyway, back to the story. Indiana Jones got himself captured while searching for the Lance of Longinus and the Nazis plan on trying to get some information out of him before they kill him. This plot thread doesn’t go anywhere especially since the Lance of Longinus turns out to be a fake anyway and of course they try to kill Indiana Jones and it doesn’t work because…do I even need to say it? Also this is a flashback, we obviously know he’s gonna be fine. That and we’re introduced to another supposed long-time friend of Indy’s named Basil Shaw (played by Toby Jones) who also got himself captured and the Nazis try to get information out of him as well. I suppose the escape involving Indy freeing himself from the Nazis and catching up with Basil on the train they have him on is kinda cool if a bit nonsensical. I especially love how after Indy hijacks one of the Nazi’s cars, the Nazis in the backseat just tap him on the shoulder going ‘Stop it! Stop it!’
The lance may be a fake, but they find out something else on the train is real and it’s the Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch. No really, when Indy makes it to the treasure car he bypasses what’s clearly a replica of the Holy Hand Grenade and it’s freaking hilarious! Jokes aside, what they really discover to be a powerful relic is an ancient dial (hence the title) called the Antikythera. This is an actual historical device created by the great Greek mathematician Archimedes who intended it to be used to predict when eclipses and other astronomical events will occur. Of course in the movie it’s used to become a God because movies. Not gonna lie, when I heard the villain explain this I legit wanted to see Indy try to become a God at the end of this movie. That would’ve been grand and epic to me and also given the franchise a big exit that I would’ve liked it to have. He doesn’t and instead creates more plot threads that could be interesting if they actually decided to explore them, but that’s later. For now he gets his BFF that he’s totally known for years to safety and supposedly kills off the villain of the movie before managing to recover one half of the dial. In the movie they explain how apparently Archimedes split the Antikythera in half to prevent it from falling into the wrong hands and he also made what was called a Grafikos as a kind of treasure map to the other half. It took multiple viewings to fully understand what these things were and that’s another problem I have with this movie, it’s very explain-y and not in any fun kind of way.
In some of the previous movies such as Raiders or Crusade there were moments that were slow moving and had a lot of exposition, but the characters sounded invested in what they were saying and even excited about what these archaeological finds could mean. Not only that but it effectively built up the adventure you were about to see, the relics they were talking about, and made you want to keep watching. These exposition scenes in Dial just make me want to fall asleep. This especially didn’t help the first time I watched this movie since it was late at night and I actually did fall asleep. I’ll also say what I said for Crystal Skull, these themes don’t match with the tone of Indiana Jones.
Even with Temple, as bad as it got, it still more or less kept to the feel of Indiana Jones which was based in mythology, religion, folklore, and the like. This is just math. Math and space. Yeah, we’re doing space again because it worked so well last time. Don’t get me wrong, I like space as much as the next person, it’s just not Indiana Jones. Speaking of Indiana Jones, we flash forward again to see the man himself (played for the final time by Harrison Ford) being rudely awakened by the Beatles’ ‘Magical Mystery Tour’ playing at full blast. This might sound weird, but I actually like Indiana Jones in the movie. Instead of like Crystal Skull, Harrison Ford actually seems to be playing an aging Indiana Jones as opposed to imitating a younger version of himself. He’s kind of a crotchety dejected old man who’s having a hard time coming to grips with his present while yearning for the past. After seeing this guy’s adventures for 4 whole movies at this point, I totally believe he’d be like this in his old age. Also he’s divorced. How many times are these movies going to tease his and Marion’s relationship?!
It’s never expressly told to us in the movie either, but it takes place in 1969. You can tell because early in the film we have mentions of ‘Moon Day’, talk about astronauts touring the city, and Vietnam protests. It doesn’t really add much outside of giving Indiana a quick escape in one of the chase sequences, but…no that’s pretty much it. After all, if you’re going to steal from an Indiana Jones film, may as well steal from the best one. That was sarcasm in case you couldn’t tell. Either way, Indy goes to school and teaches a class discussing what’ll eventually become the main focus of the film, the siege of Syracuse in 214 BC. Afterwards he gets an award for his hard work and dedication to the college (not Barnett College, but a different one) which he immediately gives away to the first person he sees, goes to drink at a bar, and we’re introduced to Helena Shaw (played by Phoebe Waller-Bridge) who is the daughter of Basil Shaw and the goddaughter of Indiana Jones. I don’t care.
I suppose she has a distinct-ish personality and is acted fine, but honestly I’m just tired of seeing random people who’re supposedly from Indy’s past popping up out of nowhere and the movie immediately expecting us to care about them. No movie, I don’t care, and I’m tired of you repeating crap over and over. Why not actually make this movie feel like it was part of the original plan for Indiana Jones and utilize characters from the previous films? Show us how these characters grow and develop, introduce new ones along the way, not just ones that the movie says were there from the start even though they weren’t, and have them offer new and interesting things. As I’m writing this review I’ve also been Googling a lot of images and whatnot (as you can see) and I’ve come across articles such as “Why Indy calls Helena ‘Wombat’ in Dial of Destiny,” and “Was Basil in the Series Before Dial of Destiny?,” and to me, if you’re having to make articles like this in the first place, the movie isn’t working. The movie should make these things clear in its 2 hour and 37 minute running time, you shouldn’t have to go hunting for these answers yourself. For some movies it’s fine to leave things vague, but in Indiana Jones that’s what got us burning rock turds in Temple and the “Space between Spaces,” so I’d like more detail please.
As it turns out, Helena is also obsessed with the Antikythera just like her father and Indiana (as the movie tells us but doesn’t show us), and she has information about it that Indiana doesn’t. In between these two talking in the bar and going to find out more about the Antikythera, we see how the villain of the film, currently going by Dr. Schmidt (played by Mads Mikkelsen), somehow survived getting birch-slapped by a railway pole at 80 mph 25-30 years ago (movie, your Crystal Skull is showing) and he’s apparently still obsessed with the Antikythera. Funnily enough, I actually am more interested in the villain’s henchmen than the villain himself. Well, henchmen and henchwoman. These might actually be the most developed henchmen I’ve ever seen in any of these films. I actually get distinct personalities out of them, and while they are still one-note, they’re kinda fun to watch. There’s Klaber (played by Boyd Holbrook) who’s fast, loud, and reckless, Hauke (played by Olivier Richters) who’s the not-so-smart brute character, and Mason (played by Shaunette Renée Wilson) is the by-the-book one. Can I just get a TV show starring these three? I don’t know what it would be called or what the plot would be, I just know that I want it.
So Indy and Helena go to a repository of information, which just so happens to have the half of the dial that Indy recovered in the flashback, and they talk about it which is when I fell asleep the first time. They’re eventually intercepted by the Three Stooges fresh off of murdering two innocent bystanders who chase Helena away with the dial half in her possession and capture Indy. Of course he escapes by riling up the crowd of Vietnam protesters they just so happen to be walking through and he steals a police horse. Eventually Indy makes his way into the subway system where he finally eludes them on one of the shortest subway stops I’ve ever seen. Literally the train pulls up and 10 seconds later it leaves. Did the subway stop to pick up the Flash? Also, Mason calls Klaber a ‘trigger-happy cracker’ for shooting at Helena and scaring her away. Why did they have her say that? Mason calls Dr. Schmidt who’s supposed to meet the President because he supposedly helped create the Apollo 11 shuttle and tells him the bad news. He takes it well.
In the meantime Indiana ends up getting framed for the murder of those two innocent bystanders and has to ask Sallah (played one last time by John Rhys-Davies) for help, who I’m only just now realizing might be my favorite Indiana Jones character. He’s usually happy and energetic when he’s on-screen, is the only one who can randomly break out into song which always makes me smile, has good jokes that land, and he’s probably the most virtuous character in the series with being a great father and now grandfather as well as a top-notch friend to Indiana. Sallah tells Indy that Helena is likely taking a plane to Tangier, Morocco, so the only logical thing to do now is to head to Tangier and leave Sallah behind. You had one job movie, actually include characters we know and love and you couldn’t do it even when you brought back the original actors! Even Jurassic World Dominion got that down even if it was done badly, why are you so weirdly comfortable reminding us that characters we love exist and then not utilize them? I know it does technically tie into Indy and his character since he knows he’s not who he used to be and doesn’t want anymore adventures, but how does he not know this is going to be another adventure? He’s freaking Indiana Jones! Adventure sticks to him like magnetic objects sometimes stick to the Crystal Skull, this is obviously another adventure! He also ends up trying to find the path Archimedes left behind with his dial by the end anyway, so why wouldn’t he take Sallah? Jeez!
Anyway, Indy makes it to Tangier where we’re introduced to our child sidekick for the movie named Teddy (played by Ethann Isidore) who seems like an afterthought when we first see him but eventually becomes a main character. He’s busy guarding Helena’s private auction of the dial half and setting up for the third act when Indy busts in and gives Helena a talking to. Not long after, Schmidt comes in as well (this is what happens when your security is a child) and a fight breaks out for the dial. After a lot of fighting the dial makes its way into Schmidt’s hands so Indy and Helena follow him out of the building and right into police hands. They have them surrounded, but Indy tells them to put their guns down and they…do. Great police there. They’re also found out by Helena’s mobster fiancé (nothing ever comes of this so I’m just moving on) and another chase begins. It can be cool from time to time but my big problem is that it takes forever. Nearly 10 minutes of straight chase and the thing they’re fighting over hasn’t even been properly built up, so why are we supposed to care? One thing I do like is how Helena confronts Indy about his motives for going on these adventures since he tries to give her an ethics lesson on the drive but she turns it right back on him. It’s probably about time someone talked to him about that thrill addiction and savior complex he clearly has.
Schmidt eventually escapes, but Mason is not happy with him. She tells him that the President doesn’t want to talk to him anymore and isn’t pleased with the chaos he’s caused thus far. Now their only option is to disappear if they want to carry out this mission, but too bad, Mason is out. This causes a fight to break out on the plane which gets Mason shot and killed which begs the question: why was she a character anyway? She didn’t really add anything outside of the chemistry she had with the other henchmen, so why even have her as a character if you’re just going to kill her not even halfway through the movie? Was it just for that ‘trigger happy cracker’ line? We all know how golden that nugget was. Who wrote this?
Ah, that explains a lot. But wait, we’re then revealed the shocking twist! Just before Mason dies, Schmidt turns to her and says:
After cutting back to Indy and the rest of his gang, they do a bit of arguing until they decide to head to Greece where Indy says he has a friend who’s a diver and can help them because the Grafikos is underwater. I don’t know, I stopped paying attention. They come across this supposed friend in Greece named Renaldo (played by Antonio Banderas) and I would pay so much more attention if he was a CG cat with a hat and boots. I guess he’s kinda the Sallah stand-in, but if you were gonna just do Sallah again, why not just do Sallah?! You literally showed you were able to get him back already, it’s like you’re actively trying to piss us off at this point! Although, I will give Banderas some credit. While his character isn’t much of a character he is the only one who looks like he’s having fun in the movie since he’s easily delighted by a simple card trick Helena does for him which gets me to laugh every time. Still just wishing he was Sallah though.
There is a genuine heartfelt moment between Helena and Indy after this though. After spewing some more tired exposition Helena asks him what he would do if he could go back in time. Indy says he would stop his son from enlisting. As it turns out, Mutt decided to sign up to fight in Vietnam but was killed in battle and his death caused a rift in Marion and Indy’s relationship eventually leading to their divorce. I’m not going to act like I cared about Mutt, like at all, but Ford’s acting in this scene is what makes it emotional to me. It’s not so much that Mutt is dead that makes me feel in this scene, it’s that Indiana Jones, a long-running cinematic hero, is a broken man because of it and Ford totally sells it. They then decide the next morning to dive for the Grafikos, which they do, and manage to recover it from a sunken ship while we get our final Indiana Jones snake fear joke. The water’s full of eels, so they’re basically like water snakes. I also just wanna say that, in a weird way, I like how each movie in some way has a joke surrounding Indy’s snake fear. Whether it’s done well or not, in a strange way it helps tie them all together.
However, by the time they get back above water with the Grafikos, it turns out Voller and his crew have tracked them down. How? What tipped them off that they would be here of all places? You forgot to show the scene where they picked up clues as to where the Grafikos might be so this just makes no sense. Once back in the boat, Voller tries to motivate Indy to help them, but he doesn’t wanna. Since Indy doesn’t wanna, Voller shoots and kills Renaldo. Again, would’ve been so much more sad if it were Sallah. I know I mentioned it a lot already, but dammit, I’m dying on this hill! This convinces Helena to help them for a small fee. She does just that and then blows up the boat with dynamite that was established to be there not long ago. This allows them to escape and follow the trail to the Ear of Dionysius. Voller watches them as they escape and figures out where they’re going just by watching them sail away, because it’s so easy to do that. Seriously, from this point on it’s like Voller has a tracker placed in Indy’s hat or something but they forgot to show the scene of him putting the tracker in Indy’s hat. I can’t believe I’m saying this…but even Crystal Skull managed to do that. You made me do it, movie! You made me find something that made sense in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull! I hate you!
Either way, they make it to wherever they were going where Teddy gets himself captured because sure, why not? Meanwhile, Indy and Helena try to get him back by beating Voller and his crew to the place and during this time we get a much clearer picture of the reality of their situation. It’s kinda funny, but while Indy’s climbing the side of a rock with Helena he pauses and Helena asks him what he’s doing. He says he’s thinking about why when he’s 80 years old he’s still climbing rocks with a bum shoulder, plated leg, screwed leg, and multiple years of gunshot wounds. Helena doesn’t really get what he’s whining about, and honestly I don’t either it’s not like the movies were that big on logic in the past anyway, but he also tells Helena that she’s still young and agile and she never had to drink the Blood of Kali, or get tortured with voodoo. His words, not mine. Kind of a weird place to put an explicit Temple of Doom reference especially since it’s tossed aside quickly as well, but whatever. Back with Voller’s group Teddy kills Hauke in what’s honestly a pretty comedic way. It’s obvious they want to get across that Teddy is a resourceful kid, kind of like Short Round, so what they have him do is pull the both of them into a river since Hauke had handcuffed himself to Teddy to keep him from escaping, and while they’re in the water Teddy steals the handcuff key from Hauke, crawls through a small gap in a grate, uncuffs himself, and cuffs Hauke to the grate. The only problem I have with this is that it was said earlier back on the boat that Teddy doesn’t know how to swim, but he’s clearly able to pick up on it surprisingly quickly here for the purposes of this kill.
They all end up making it to Archimedes’ tomb where they discover the second half of the dial, and also that Archimedes’ corpse is wearing a watch for some reason. Hmm. So Voller comes in with Klaber, takes the second half of the dial, and they have a brief shootout resulting in Indiana Jones getting shot in the shoulder. Whew, I almost thought this climax wasn’t going to have any stakes. Don’t worry, it still won’t. They end up taking Indy hostage and Voller’s plan is revealed. He wants to use the Antikythera to go back in time to the year 1939 and ensure that the Nazis win the war. The major difference though is that he wants to overthrow Hitler and lead the Nazis to victory himself. I suppose that is a motivation, but if I’m being honest it’s also kind of a let-down. When Voller first saw the Antikythera half in the opening and was talking about how the one who uses it will become a God, I was honestly expecting more than this. Also, this plan is one that could be easily thwarted. In the end these plans take time to enact which could involve years even after he travels back in time and he’s going to need a lot of people behind him in order to make sure it works, and as of right now he has maybe a dozen including Klaber.
Anyway, hot on their trail is Helena and Teddy who catch up to the Nazi plane they’re riding on in a motorcycle and a plane respectively. Teddy is also flying the plane himself. Third act payoff like I said. You know, if they’re going to make Teddy this resourceful I kinda want to see him team up with the kid from Jurassic Park III to see what kind of crazy things they’ll do. With their powers combined I’m sure they could probably figure out how to cure cancer or something. So they travel through the rejected Galaxy Quest wormhole to find, not 1939 Sicily, but 214 BC Sicily. Yep, came right back around full circle. And what’s going on outside? The siege of Syracuse of course, and right in the heart of the city is Archimedes (played by Nasser Memarzia) working on the Antikythera at that exact moment! Crazy how that works, huh?
The whole time, Voller is freaking out and trying to figure out how to get back to where they were while they’re still in the plane and getting ballistae bolts shot at them. Not gonna lie, seeing the contrast of the 20th century planes in the air and the ancient Roman ships in the water is pretty awesome to me. I don’t know why, it’s just cool. Although, I would’ve preferred my Indiana Jones villain to retain at least some form of dignity while he still can. He spends most of the climax just screaming like a little birch which the same could not be said for the previous good Indiana Jones villains. Even when they were at their corniest, villains like Belloq or Donovan still had a sort of air of confidence and coolness about them. After looking up even more images for this review, I found out that Voller was supposedly based on a real life person who was both a NASA scientist and a Nazi. That on its own does make him moderately cooler but that doesn’t always show up on screen, and especially not here.
Eventually the Nazi plane crashes after Indy and Helena parachute out of it (yeah, she jumped off her motorcycle and into the wheel-well of the plane), Archimedes examines the wreckage and puts Voller’s watch on (hehe), and Teddy goes to help them in his plane. While they’re on the ground together, Indy starts to get sentimental with Helena despite the fact that he’s been bleeding from a gunshot wound for at least the past 15 minutes of screen time while he watches history unfold around him. Helena is understandably confused and Indy tells her that he wants to stay here. If you’re like me, you’re probably a bit surprised at the direction the movie’s taking right now and I’m not sure what to feel about it either. Is this really how they’re going to make Indiana Jones go out? I suppose I’m not necessarily against the idea since I think Indiana Jones does deserve a proper and respectful exit from cinema, but he keeps talking about how he wants to stay because he’s dreamed and studied about this place all his life. Maybe if they had him talk about how there’s nothing left for him back home I would be able to get behind this a bit more, but they just have him talk about the place that we’ve only seen him talk about for 1 movie. Why would this be a satisfying exit for him if that was his reasoning?
Either way, you don’t have to think about it for too long because in the end Helena makes the decision for him. She punches him in the jaw knocking him out and takes him back home by force. Okay, what pisses me off more is that if you’re going to introduce this idea, why won’t you follow all the way through with it? I know I literally just talked about why his reasoning for wanting to stay was shaky at best, but it still would’ve at least been challenging and maybe even emotional if they did it that way. In the end they just do the Frozen 2 thing. They introduced in that movie as well that the kingdom Anna and Elsa had grown up in was built on discrimination and lies (much like America) and that the consequence for that was going to be the kingdom getting destroyed. In the end, Elsa just saves the kingdom at the last minute so nothing challenging is explored. Much like in that movie, I don’t think everyone would’ve liked it if Indiana Jones decided to retire to Syracuse, Sicily in 214 BC, but it at least would’ve started a conversation and made people think about the franchise up until now. If you’re not going to follow through with these ideas, don’t put them in your movie.
So Indy wakes back up in his apartment where Helena is waiting and she explains why she brought him back. For one, he would’ve changed the course of history (which, fair) and two he needed to stay in his own time period. This is when he asks “For who?” Only now do they acknowledge his lack of support left which would’ve been more powerful if they had him mention that before Helena punched him. Of course this prompts Teddy to come in with Marion (played for the last time by Karen Allen). If that’s the only reason they waited to acknowledge his support system that’s pretty stupid. Sallah is also there and leaves soon after along with Teddy and Helena while Marion and Indy get familiar again. They do this by retreading the same conversation they had on the boat in Raiders. If you’ve seen the movie you probably know what I mean, but here’s a quick recap: Where doesn’t it hurt? Yeah, they do this exact same thing practically line-for-line and it’s pretty annoying. Especially since this is the third time they’re teasing Marion’s and Indy’s relationship together! Are they in love or not, pick something! Then we also go out on the most boring note any of these movies have ever closed on. We see Indy’s hat hanging on a clothesline outside his apartment window and he grabs it. That’s where it stops. I’m not kidding.
So that’s Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. Is it good, is it bad? Yes. Let me be clear, even though I did talk a lot of crap about this movie, there are still some things I like in it. Bringing back some OG characters was pretty sweet even if I wish they were utilized more, the kid Teddy can be fun to watch and I’m kind of a sucker for smart kids in movies anyway, some of the action is cool though a bit drawn-out occasionally, and the three henchmen Klaber, Hauke, and Mason are surprisingly interesting when they’re all together. Besides those things it is very hard to follow, repeats a lot of the mistakes of the lesser films before it especially when it comes to characters, goes out of its way to piss fans off, and is mostly very boring. In the end do I recommend it, do I not recommend it? It’s honestly up to you.
While my opinion on this movie I think has been made clear through this review, I hope that it also gives you some clarity as to whether you think it would be a good fit for you as well. If you’re a fan of action films there’s definitely some of that here especially if you couldn’t care less about characters or story, but I personally can’t get behind it. It’s not Indiana Jones, it’s just another action movie, and that’s not what Indiana Jones is. Indiana Jones can be creative, can be immersive, can be heart-pounding, can be grand, and can be unforgettable, but this movie just isn’t those things. As I’m writing this I’m already starting to forget a lot of the scenes I watched which isn’t a good sign for a film trying to stand the test of time. Good luck on your journey if you plan to pop this in for your weekend movie night, but I think this is a series I’m glad to retire from.
If I were to give it a rating the absolute best I can give it would be a 2.5/5 tuk-tuks. Certainly an underwhelming note to end this series out on. Better than the last one, but not by a whole lot.
Thank you for joining me for Indiana Jones month! If this is something you’d like to see me do more of in the future, by all means leave a comment. I’m open to any and all suggestions!
Other Indy Reviews
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Who’s ready for some creatively bankrupt Indiana Jones? No one? Well someone has to suffer with me!
Disclaimer:
The movie I’ll be reviewing this week is rated: PG-13
All content is unsuitable and too dumb for children and adults.
Well we knew this would happen at one point or another, but it doesn’t make it any easier to get through. Let’s just get right to it and not waste any time. Despite the fact that the public and critics considered the first three Indiana Jones films to be a perfect trilogy that need not be added onto, 19 years later Lucas and Spielberg thought it was necessary to give us Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Suck, I mean Skull. Nobody knew they wanted it at the time and as it turns out: yes, they didn’t want it. To this day the film boasts a 77% fresh critical rating on Rotten Tomatoes, but audiences are still heavily torn on it even with how much people seem to universally loathe it outside of online movie-rating sites. With the return of characters, plot threads, and action scenes we’ve all seen several times before in this franchise, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull almost seems proud to regurgitate all these things while also offering absolutely nothing original. You could practically do a complete listicle on how many moments in this movie were just straight-up lifted from past films in the series it’s so uninspired.
Say what you will about Temple of Doom, it at least took risks and gave us something worthy of holding the Indiana Jones name, this turns out to be just a bland action-adventure movie of the week. I’m practically bored just thinking about it, but let’s see if tearing into this movie detail by detail can result in more entertainment than what’s contained in the film’s entire runtime. Surely something of value has to come out of this hunk of junk and I understand that might be a bit too optimistic considering the circumstances but just let me have this okay!
Grab your fedoras and hitch a ride on the back of Shia LaBeouf’s motorcycle whether you want to or not because this is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull.
So remember how in each of the previous Indiana Jones movies the Paramount logo faded into a shot of a mountain even if it was a mountain engraved on a gong? This movie opens with the Paramount logo fading into a shot of a gopher mound. I immediately hate this movie. A new record! The point of fading into a shot of a mountain was to get the audience excited for the sense of adventure the movie was about to offer them (even if Temple of Doom immediately threw that out for a song and dance number), but what am I supposed to do with this?! The gopher isn’t a main character (big duh on that one) and there’s ultimately no point in showing this scene since it doesn’t have any of the other characters we know in it. Sure the intros in the other movies tended to not have a connection to the main story of the films, but they at least included characters that were major players in them. Here we have a car driven by snot-nosed teens who immediately run over the mound. They’re blasting one of Elvis Presley’s greatest hits, ‘Hound Dog’, and challenging the military vehicle next to them to a race. As young idiots do. There’s a lot to hate about this intro which, much like I said in the Temple of Doom review, does not in any way match the spirit of Indiana Jones. In fact, I could probably make this entire review about how this intro is trash, but I’ll try to keep it concise.
For some reason, when the driver of the military vehicle next to these kids takes them up on their offer for a race he doesn’t get reprimanded and the officers don’t threaten the kids either for interfering in military business. Eventually they leave each other behind and we discover these officers were driving into Area 51 of all places which makes you question how the hell those kids were even able to get that close to Area 51 in the first place considering the fact that it’s Area 51. As it turns out though, those officers are actually Russian infiltrators who quite easily make it past Area 51’s defenses and we see that they’re keeping a guy named Mac (played by Ray Winstone) and the man himself Indiana Jones (played by a half-awake Harrison Ford) in two separate car trunks. This movie conveniently also takes place 19 years after the events of the previous movie in 1957, and I think now is as good a time as any to talk about Harrison Ford’s acting in this. Of course we’ve seen him pull off the suave, rugged, misunderstood action hero before even within this same franchise, but here he just seems…off. Especially watching this movie immediately after Last Crusade, it’s hard to believe that this is the same guy in both movies. In every scene he’s in it’s like he’s a goofy dad trying to do an impression of Indiana Jones as opposed to actually playing Indiana Jones. Maybe it’s his age or the fact that chronologically he’s been away from this character for nearly two decades, but he never feels quite like Indiana Jones, almost as if every direction he received in every scene was just “act cool”.
After Jack Sparrow-ing himself by crawling out of an embarrassing situation in the first few minutes of the movie, Indiana and the rest of the audience are introduced to this movie’s villain Irina Spalko (played by Cate Blanchett). Being a well-trained and skilled actress herself I don’t think Cate Blanchett was a bad choice for this role, but they just don’t write her or direct her in a way that’s interesting so she comes off as standard. Don’t get me wrong, some of the past Indiana Jones villains could be hokey or have their awkward moments, but they were not standard. Belloq as the shadowy reflection of our hero and trying to create a radio to God, Mola Ram and his desire to destroy all of the other religions leaving only the Thuggee, Donovan and his insatiable hunger for notoriety and rare antiquities to show off at his country club, and Spalko just wants to…know things. Yeah, that’s her entire character motivation: she wants to know things. They try to give her the slightest bit of development by explaining in a later scene that she was part of a Russian psychic science initiative, but it never plays any part in the movie outside of giving us an awkward moment of her trying to read Indy’s mind which doesn’t work (and is also incredibly stupid) and that’s it. In the end she has about as much staying power as Ford from the Godzilla remake in which she’s so memorable you forgot she even had a name.
She’s trying to find a box in Area 51, which for some reason is home to the same warehouse they put the Ark in at the end of Raiders, and this box’s contents are a complete mystery except to Indiana Jones. Less talking and more doing Indy, go find that box. As it turns out, the box she’s looking for has something in it that is so incredibly magnetic it’s able to attract gunpowder and shotgun shells from across the warehouse which is around the size of at least one football field. Why it doesn’t attract everything else magnetic in the warehouse such as the ceiling lamp parts, the guns the soldiers are holding, the crowbars they use to open the box, Spalko’s rapier, the armored trucks’ metal chassis, any metal glasses frames the soldiers may have on them, and several other magnetic objects that are likely being held in the warehouse including the Ark of the Covenant itself is anybody’s guess. Regardless, they find it, open the box with the crowbars I mentioned, only now do the crowbars get magnetized to the box after it’s already been opened, and Spalko takes it away. Before she can leave, Indiana Jones does his best Indiana Jones impression and fights one of the soldiers’ guns away from them and threatens to shoot Spalko. But uh-oh, it looks like Mac is a traitor! Oh good, I forgot I don’t care.
Essentially what they’re doing here is trying to create a sidekick that’s sort of a combo of Satipo from Raiders and Wu Han from Temple. Of course having Indy’s sidekick betray him is ripped directly from Satipo and Raiders (you could argue Elsa from Crusade as well), but they try to make it sound like they have this long, complicated history together. We never see it though, much like Wu Han in Temple, so why are we supposed to care about this? This doesn’t make me feel concerned for Indy’s well-being or the conflict between these characters, all it does is make me feel annoyed that I could’ve chosen to watch one of those movies instead of this. Indy escapes, of course because of the whole Indiana Jones thing, but briefly on his way out we get treated to a shot of a broken box revealing the Ark of the Covenant inside. This offers no narrative purpose other than reminding you that Raiders existed.
After this bit of action we’re treated to most people’s biggest issue with this movie. While Indy escapes from the Russians, he makes his way to a small town where it appears that everyone is more wooden and fake than the rest of the actors in this movie. Or that might just be because they’re mannequins. Yeah, as it turns out, Indy found his way into a nuclear testing site and a bomb is about to go off very soon. First he tries to make it out by hitching a ride in one of the Russian’s cars which doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Weren’t you trying to get away from them anyway, why would they help you in this situation? With nowhere else to turn, he’s forced to hop into a fridge to save himself. Which works. What makes it even worse is that Indy makes it out without a single scratch on him despite being thrown miles from his starting point and he bypasses the same car he tried to escape in earlier while they get fried in the blast. Okay, so there’s elevated logic for the purposes of giving us an unforgettable adventure and there’s Wile E. Coyote cartoon. This is a Wile E. Coyote cartoon.
At least after this bit of ridiculousness we’re treated to charming and likable characters that will last us throughout the rest of the mo- No we’re not. Much like with Mac earlier we’re introduced to these people in a bunker that Indy has supposedly known for years but they have absolutely no on-screen chemistry together so they leave no impact on us. It only makes it better when we cut back to Barnett College where Dr. Jones is teaching his class again (because this movie wants to remind you how good Raiders and Crusade were) where he once again gets interrupted by faux Marcus Brody: Charlie (played by Jim Broadbent). This movie’s favorite pastime is to introduce characters that have no bearing on the story and leave no impact on you whatsoever. I give the movie some credit because they couldn’t bring back Denholm Elliott to play Marcus in this role since he had actually passed 3 years after the release of Crusade from tuberculosis, but they don’t really treat his passing that honorably because they essentially replace his character without a second thought and with someone who’s about as bland as everyone else in this movie.
Charlie tells Indy that since the FBI is looking for him after the incident with the Russians, he has no choice but to give him an indefinite leave of absence until the matter is resolved. On his way out of college town, a young man interrupts him while his train is leaving the platform. This man is named Mutt (played by Shia LaBeouf) and he’s so cool that he rides a motorcycle, has more hair gel than every boy band member, carries a switchblade, and is decked out in leather. It’s not so hard for me to say that I instantly don’t believe that this kid is from 1957. Every time he’s on-screen I’m not so much prepared to see how he adapts to the world he’s about to be thrust into as opposed to prepared for him to scream at me:
It’s him that reveals to Indy how his mentor/father figure Dr. Harold Oxley has been captured alongside his mom on the quest to find the city of Akator also known as El Dorado. I don’t know, to me it just feels weird having Indiana Jones being thrust into a position like this as opposed to actively seeking it out like in the other movies. It feels less archeological and more mercenary like. They share some shoddy character development until they’re interrupted by a gang of Russians trying to steal Indiana for his expertise again, but Mutt punches a random guy in the face allowing them to escape kicking off another chase scene in a Jones film, but this one feels particularly off for one main reason: there isn’t as much of a sense of danger like in the other chase scenes. All of the previous chase scenes in the previous movies felt tense because they took place in areas where Indy was outnumbered and at a loss for support. Here it takes place in Indy’s college town which massively dilutes the tension and sense of urgency since it’s a place he’s familiar with and a place he could easily find backup in. That and they come across one of Indy’s students who he tells to “Get out of the library” which goes against what was mentioned in Crusade where Indy mentioned in his class that 70% of archeology is done in the library. Not the main reason to hate this scene, but it definitely doesn’t help.
In the end they make it to a safe place where Dr. Jones decodes the letter that Mutt gave him from Oxley saying that the pathway to Akator starts in Nazca, Peru. They fly their way there but the movie pauses briefly in the middle of their flight to highlight how Indiana Jones fell asleep on the plane. Why did you show that? Even in Temple when they paused the transition from Shanghai to Delhi they showed it was because there was something important to the story that took place, falling asleep is not exactly pertinent for the audience to know! Once they’re there though, they pick up the trail from where Oxley left off and partake in more dialogue that makes me question even more why the filmmakers thought this was a necessary follow-up to make. Mutt reveals how he left school several times and Indy questions him on his life goals which no one cares about. It will come back into the movie later in a weak twist that no one asked for, but we’ll get to that when we get to that. That and once they do pick up Oxley’s trail, it isn’t really that fun.
Everything the characters are discussing at these points are verbal dotted lines on a treasure map which I might be able to forgive if the actors were more invested in what they were saying like in the previous movies, but here it sounds boring and it feels boring. Back in the first three movies the characters talk about the things that they’re looking for with awe, excitement, delight, and wonder. It helps to build up these artifacts as something truly special and worth searching for, but that’s not here. The only reason the characters are searching for this thing is to save characters we don’t even know and it’s not even fully clear what they’re searching for. Are they trying to find the city of El Dorado or this crystal skull they mentioned in only one scene so far? Since the focus is so unclear, why should anyone care about what’s happening?
Anyway they make it to some burial ground where they’re attacked by tribes people and Indy manages to defeat one of them by blowing a poison dart into the back of his throat. Because these tribes people thought they might be facing Indiana Jones so they decided to make their poison darts double-sided, jeez this movie is stupid! They carve their way deep into the burial site, Mutt gets stung by a scorpion and doesn’t die which makes the audience cry, and they finally discover the majorly built-up crystal skull which continues to make every scientist watching this movie fuming with rage with how inconsistently magnetic it is. After taking it out of the burial site they’re cornered by the Russians and Mac who capture them and somehow managed to find their location despite not having any way of following them without any clues from Dr. Oxley. Let’s be real though, if it’s making this movie go faster I’ll take it, and they’re taken to the Russians’ campsite.
The skull is of course stolen from Indy and Mutt and they try to give Mac a bit more of a motivation here, but it’s just every 90’s Disney villain motivation: money. In fact, much like Elsa in the previous film, Mac’s character really doesn’t make a whole lot of sense here and often goes back and forth between good and evil on a whim, but unlike Elsa in the previous film Mac leaves way less of an impression than she did and offers an emotionless performance making us care about him even less. We also find out what the skull is: an alien skull! Isn’t that just what you wanted out of an Indiana Jones movie? Sci-fi? Was anyone thinking when they wrote this?! We liked the previous Indiana Jones films because they dealt with legendary and religious artifacts that were grounded in folklore and ancient history, not alien invasions!
Despite my complaints, the movie continues and Spalko tries to manipulate Indy with the skull which also ends up going nowhere and we finally are introduced to Dr. Harold Oxley in person (played by John Hurt). I’m just gonna say what everyone’s thinking too: John Hurt has a tendency to be the kiss of death for modern cinema. Don’t get me wrong, he’s a great actor and I’ve loved him in other movies back in the 70’s and 80’s, but for some reason if anyone casts him in a movie from the year 2000 onward, it’s pretty much guaranteed to be crap. Oxley is under some kind of skull hypnosis or whatever and isn’t thinking clearly, but don’t worry, Marion Ravenwood is also here (played again by Karen Allen)!
Just like Harrison Ford, Karen Allen doesn’t seem to know how to play her old character from 27 years prior, because she’s just as awkward as everyone else yet they still try to make her a badass. The only reason we’re still able to recognize her as Marion is because of John Williams’ score which plays her theme from Raiders whenever she’s on screen. Considering that, this is also as good a time as any to mention the music in this movie. Usually even if John Williams scores a terrible movie I can still hold on to the only good aspect in it which was his amazing orchestrations. In this movie though, it sounds like complete autopilot. While there are original songs conducted for this movie, all of them sound like generic action music that any other composer could’ve written outside of when the movie wants to remind you of which characters are on screen like with Indy, Marion, and Henry Jones’s brief cameo. Outside of that, none of them are anything I’d be itching to put on my Spotify playlist.
With Marion revealed and Indiana as horny as he usually is for any woman he’s ever met in these movies, he decides to help the Russians to find Akator as quickly as possible and decipher Ox’s cryptic messages. In the process though, Mutt decides now is a great time to mount an escape which ultimately goes nowhere since they’re recaptured less than 5 minutes later. Why was that even in the movie? Then we have a Twister-esque argument between Indy and Marion since it was revealed that Mutt is actually Indy’s son and Indy tries to insert himself into Marion’s parenting of Mutt. It seems like the movie is trying to play this for laughs, but much like in Twister, it’s just annoying as hell and drags the movie out which is the last thing I want in this movie. Their argument eventually culminates in the beginning of another chase sequence much like what happened after Henry was introduced in the last movie, and of course they capture the crystal skull for themselves again along with Oxley. Not before a completely unbelievable sequence of Mutt getting separated from the group and rejoining them by meeting up with a bunch of monkeys and swinging on vines as if his real parents were Kala and Kerchak. Oh, and also the side antagonist dies. Since Spalko is so standard and forgettable in this, I bet you can imagine how much of an impact this guy left. I don’t even know what his name was and I don’t care to look. I guess his death is kinda cool though. Maybe even cooler than Spalko’s eventual death, but we’ll get to that.
Mac rejoins our heroes (Does it really matter?) and they find the entrance to Akator. He’s secretly dropping trackers though because he’s still not entirely on their side, but they make their way in by beating the crap out of ancient artifacts. Remember when the slightest movement in an ancient temple could result in death? Now just go ham on it like it’s a Street Fighter bonus level. The circle of alien skeletons awaits them there but Mac betrays them again and Spalko walks in with her team of Russians. After taking the skull from Oxley she reattaches it to the one skeleton missing its head and they spring to life. It was explained earlier (poorly) that after the circle is completed it’ll grant one wish, and Spalko wishes to know everything. Again, solid motivation for a Jones villain. Upon activating the alien circle the city starts to fall apart around them so Jones and his compatriots escape, except for Mac who the movie gives a weird exit to. He ends up dying, but before being crushed by the disintegrating city they try to give him a sort of emotional moment with Indy which falls flat because we have no idea what his character is supposed to be and in the end nobody cares. Spalko on the other hand is practicing her early 2000’s CG effects.
Okay, so we’ve had iconic death scenes in the past ranging from face meltings, to explosions, to aging, what’re you gonna do this time?
On their way out we’re treated to even more mind-blowing effects of a UFO rising from the ashes of the city. It’s about as stupid as it sounds, but that’s pretty much this whole movie in a nutshell. Apparently this also clears up whatever was going on with Oxley because he’s now back to normal (I know it was eating you up inside if he would return to normal) and he says that the UFO didn’t make its way to space, but to the “Space Between Spaces.” Honestly, I’d be surprised if the movie didn’t describe it like that, but the only thing I can think of whenever I hear that is just the space between your couch cushions which should not be the big takeaway from your Indiana Jones movie. Anyway, they make it back home, Marion and Indiana get married because they’ve proven in the past hour that they’re totally going to be a great couple, and we wrap up what’s, in my opinion, the worst Indiana Jones movie ever made.
Much like what I said in my Temple of Doom review, that movie wasn’t good, but it at least stood out amongst the other Indiana Jones films and had it’s own sense of creative passion. This movie has no passion in it at all. It plays it completely safe by just rehashing everything the previous films did, offering nothing creatively stimulating or intriguing, and is just a boring soulless mess. That’s also why I feel comfortable calling it the worst Indiana Jones movie ever made, because while the previous movies had some parts that didn’t make sense, awkward character moments, or over-the-top action, they still had a unique identity and style that made people enjoy them. This movie has no identity, and unlike Temple of Doom, deserves no place in the Indiana Jones lineup. I almost feel uncomfortable even calling it an Indiana Jones movie, because it doesn’t deserve that title.
I suppose if you never really got that invested in any of the previous movies this one would just seem like ‘par for the course’ to you which is also how I assume this movie managed to get a 77% critical score on Rotten Tomatoes, purely from the perspective of a mindless action/adventure movie. I’m sure if you’re a fan of those kinds of movies and don’t tend to analyze character, story, or the size and scale of the journey you’re watching you could enjoy the film fine, but for mine and Indiana Jones fans’ money, this is an ancient artifact that deserves to stay buried in the ground until the end of time.
And for this reason, I feel compelled to give this movie my lowest rating of any other film: 0.5/5 gophers. While occasionally the size of the shots and cinematography can be pretty, there’s absolutely nothing else to appreciate in this film.
Other Indy Reviews
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
You have chosen wisely by joining me for my review of Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Here, Indy and his father embark on a quest to find the Holy Grail. My soul is prepared, how’s yours?
Disclaimer:
The film I’m reviewing this week is rated: PG-13
There will be some gruesome images included in this review.
While my opinions on the last film were mixed at best, it did still make a lot of money at the time of its release which prompted Spielberg, Lucas, and the Indy crew to churn out one more movie that was originally supposed to bring the Indy films to a close. Pulling out all the stops and giving us a follow-up in keeping with the tone of the original film, The Last Crusade is a much more widely praised sequel as opposed to its predecessor and considering how long it’s been since the first time I’ve seen it, I really had a fun time watching it again. To be straight up, I honestly didn’t remember much from the movie before rewatching it for the sake of this review, but once I rewatched it I was surprised how I had such a hard time remembering these moments.
Much like Raiders, this movie deals in not a whole lot of logical moments, but at least fun ones that Indiana Jones has become known for and they are very memorable. I think the main reason I had a hard time remembering them before was also because I watch movies much differently now then I did when I first saw this movie. Mostly because I have this whole review blog that you’re reading right now. There are legit interesting characters that play their parts well, creative camera work and stunt choreography, and it all amounts to an adventure that fits perfectly into the Indiana Jones canon. Despite how much crap I gave it in the last review, I think Temple of Doom did earn its place among the rest of the Indiana Jones films, though The Last Crusade definitely fits much more comfortably in the Indiana Jones lineup then Temple of Doom. Although, even with the familiar tone, humor, and pizzazz of Raiders, does The Last Crusade still hold up after all these years? Well, there’s only one way to find out.
Find your dad, give him a big hug, and prepare for this holy grand adventure with Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade!
As I said in the intro, this movie is much more in the mold of the first film, Raiders of the Lost Ark, then the second film, Temple of Doom. It begins, similar to Raiders, with an intro having no real bearing on the story where we see Indiana (played in this flashback by River Phoenix) in his first ever adventure as a child: trying to recover the Cross of Coronado from what he believes to be looters in the year 1912. It has energy, intrigue, and action even if we don’t have to worry about him potentially dying. We see a lot of things that explain the character that he’s become from the fact he used to be a boy scout where he presumably learned about self-defense, survival, and other techniques we see him utilize throughout the films while also explaining his sense of justice and morality. Towards the end of the intro we’re introduced to his relationship with his father (played in this flashback by Alex Hyde-White) which shows how he may also feel inclined to do dangerous things and acquire highly sought after relics for the purpose of getting his father’s attention which he never receives since his father is too preoccupied with his hobby of chronicling the path to finding the Holy Grail. These and several other little details are made aware to us in this opening which once again also serves as a pretty solid short film on its own as well.
Another detail that’s brought up in this opening is also the origin of Indiana’s snake phobia, which is honestly the one detail that I’m not so sure adds up. It’s shown how when Indy is trying to escape from the supposed looters, he ends up on a circus train and travels through several different animal cars. In the reptile section he ends up falling into a box full of snakes and getting covered in them by accident which is the catalyst for his future snake phobia. While I’m in no way saying that this would be a pleasant experience, I’m just not sure that this moment on its own would be enough to create a lifelong snake phobia. Personally I think it would be much funnier if it’s never explained why Indy has a fear of snakes. They could still show in this intro how when Indy is explaining to his boy scout friend Herman (played by J. J. Hardy) what should be done about the looters Indy throws a snake to the side without a second thought indicating that his phobia was created at some point throughout his adventures, but then never show what caused it. Instead they could have in a movie like Kingdom of the Crystal Skull one of the characters ask him at some point why he hates snakes so much and he responds something to the effect of “I don’t want to talk about it” making it kinda creepy and kinda funny at the same time. Either way, this opening is still pretty solid and fun much like the Raiders intro as well. Maybe not of the same caliber as that one, but still pretty good.
After the flashback, we flash forward to the year 1938 where Indiana (played a third time by Harrison Ford) is once again attempting to get the Cross of Coronado, since he couldn’t get it in the flashback, from its owner only credited as “Panama Hat” (played by Paul Maxwell). At this point Indiana Jones is officially Indiana Jones so he’s able to get it fairly easily and Panama Hat along with his crew are killed when his ship blows up on the water in the middle of a storm. Surprisingly it wasn’t Indiana who killed them, this time it was a complete accident. This never comes back into play later in the movie, but at least we can be proud of how much Indy has grown up. Back at Dr. Jones’ University, we see how after getting the Cross he’s actually been shirking his responsibilities as a professor lately since his students are all clamoring to get some answers from him about papers, tests, and grades. Seems like his night life has overtaken his day job in recent years, because while he manages to escape his students (with his trusty fedora of course) he’s quickly flagged down by some unknown people in a car who take him to a pretty swanky house.
This house happens to be the property of a certain Walter Donovan (played by Julian Glover) who brought him here to take a look at a recent discovery he’s made. Even before we know Donovan is going to be the villain of this movie, we can see just how obsessed he is with antiquities in his intro and how he sees them less like an important part of history that needs to be preserved and more like a high-end baseball card collection. He’s an overzealous rich snob who just wants to be the one to say he has this or that object in his collection and nothing else, even going so far as to partner with the worst of humanity in order to acquire them. Here we see that Donovan has found a broken piece of a tablet that’s the first of two markers that lays out the location of the Holy Grail and he also tells Indy that he’s already gotten a hold of his father to aid him in the search, but he’s disappeared. One of this movie’s strengths is getting the audience to care about this character quickly, mostly due to Indy’s reaction to hearing his father is missing. We never see his face, but in a low-angle shot we see him grip his fedora a little tighter upon hearing the news. We’ve only seen Indy’s dad once for less than a minute so far in this movie, he was a total jerk to his son, and yet I still am just as worried about him as Indy is.
Indiana decides to check on his father at home, but only finds his house completely ransacked with today’s mail opened. That’s when he remembers that earlier, back at his University, he received a package from Venice, Italy which was the last known location of his father as Donovan described. Which also makes me wonder why he thought he’d be at home. Kinda weird. One of the things I have a bit of a problem with in the beginning of this movie is that it can be a bit hard to follow why characters do what they do. Later it’s assumed that Donovan and his Nazi sleeping buddies captured Indy’s dad for the sake of luring Indy out, but why would they want to get in contact with Indy in the first place? Did they forget that Indiana Jones is Indiana Jones and he’d probably be able to take them down in a 2 hour running time or less? I suppose you could infer that Donovan and the Nazis think there’s no way Indiana Jones would be able to take them down despite the fact he did exactly that 2 years prior (movie-verse time) when they tried to steal the Ark of the Covenant, being the snobby overconfident types that they are. To me it still seems like a major lapse in logic though.
Either way, part of that is to be expected in these movies at this point, because much like I mentioned in my two previous reviews, the logic in these movies is waved for the purposes of giving us an unforgettable, heart-pounding adventure. I give leeway for the moments that enhance the fun of the movies and are cool/entertaining, and do not give leeway for the moments that aren’t fun and are dumb/annoying. If you manage to look past these details, I’d say the movie is still pretty fun, so let’s get to the rest of it. So, in the package was Daddy Jones’ Grail Diary, a collection of all the bits of info on the Grail he’s collected over the course of 40 years which prompts Indy to take Donovan up on his offer of getting 2 tickets to Venice to pick up where Daddy left off and find out where he went. Along with Marcus Brody (played again by Denholm Elliott), Indiana finds Professor Jones’ partner Dr. Elsa Schneider (played by Allison Doody) who immediately raises…suspicions. One of the first things out of her mouth is how Indiana has his father’s eyes. Wouldn’t you tell that to someone you just met?
She leads Indy and Brody back to the library where Professor Jones was last seen and find out that he discovered before going missing that there was a tomb in the library, since the library used to be a church, and the second marker is buried in it along with one of the knights of the First Crusade. Through some clever puzzle solving, they find its location and break into it. This raises no suspicions from the librarian because he’s comedically stamping books at the same time they’re smashing the tiled floor. When I first saw this I also thought it was a bit of a stretch, but Elsa actually explains before entering the library that the library is closing soon and that she’s arranged for the staff to allow them to stay longer after. Still kind of a stretch that the librarian wouldn’t just look up to see them smashing the floor in, but I suppose it’s kinda funny. Elsa and Indy drop themselves into the tomb and make their way past rats, a petroleum river, and in-universe movie references to Sir Richard’s tomb where they find the second marker. Another way to see how Elsa isn’t normal is that after being lowered into a pit full of skulls and bones, she just smiles. That’s not strange at all.
However, another group of people follow Elsa and Indiana and set fire to the petroleum river to try to kill them. They of course escape which kicks off a classic Indiana Jones chase sequence which is different for taking place in the rivers of Venice on boats instead of cars like normal. See, it’s not the same thing if it’s on the water. I shouldn’t be too hard on it though, because that’s literally what these movies are known for are its chase sequences. Eventually, Indiana catches the lead assassin and tries to get him to say where his father is, but the assassin seems completely comfortable with dying. As a result, Indiana spares the assassin who divulges that his name is Kazim (played by Kevork Malikyan) and he’s a member of a secret organization called the Brotherhood of the Cruciform Sword which has sworn for years to keep the Holy Grail safe from plunderers. They seem to be doing a bang-up job at it too. If I’m being honest, Kazim and the Brotherhood doesn’t end up doing that much by the end of the movie besides building up the Grail as the truly powerful relic that it is in which no one person can really be trusted to look after it, but unlike most other groups in movies like this that have one job and can’t freaking do it, Kazim’s group at least tries their best, and in their defense, nobody else has ever come this far in the quest for the Grail.
Since Elsa and Indy spared his life, he lets them know Indy’s dad is being kept in the Castle Brunwald in Salzburg, Austria. Before they go, Indy and Brody discover where to begin there quest for the Grail with the information they got from the second marker, Indy discovers his and Elsa’s room ransacked as well, and he and Elsa have a quick nookie session. Elsa is just another one of Indy’s hos-on-the-go so she doesn’t offer a whole lot throughout the movie. She does have a pretty big secret that’s revealed later, but we’ll get into that when we get into that. In Austria, she and Indy break through the castle’s butler security through a comedy routine you either like or don’t like, and sneak through to find where Indy’s dad is being kept. Let it be known though that someone got paid to have Indiana Jones say the line “Nazis, I hate these guys” like a sitcom character with a catch-phrase. After that bit of awkwardness, Indy breaks into his father’s room where he’s promptly hit over the head with a vase by said father. One thing I can say is that everything you need to know about Henry Jones (played by the late great Sean Connery) is shown in this scene:
Addressing his son not in a way that shows concern for his well-being or surprise that he’s just crashed through his window, but more irritation that he’s here when he isn’t supposed to be. This is essentially his whole character: gruff, stern, and hardened. He’s not the kind of father you’d expect a lot of sympathy from or the kind that would be interested in what his son does with his life, it would certainly take a quest for a biblical relic and nearly dying to make him see things differently. Before I move on, I’d also just like to point out the relationship between Indiana and Henry is instantly believable. It’s obvious Ford and Connery worked hard to get their relationship down, because whenever you see them interact with each other you really feel like these two are estranged father and son. Funny enough though, crashing through a window makes a lot of noise, so they’re quickly discovered by Nazis, and it seems like Indiana and Henry are doing pretty well at first with Indiana mowing down a few of them and startling his father in the process, until they come across our side antagonist Colonel Vogel (played by Michael Byrne) who’s taken Elsa hostage. You totally forgot she was here didn’t you? I did.
Vogel says if Indy doesn’t put down his gun he’ll shoot her, but Henry says Elsa is a Nazi. Indy doesn’t listen to his father and relinquishes the gun only to have Elsa backstab him because, as it turns out, Henry was right: she is a Nazi. The part she essentially ends up playing in the movie from here on is making Indy more cautious about who he has sex with and it’s sort of hinted at that she was forced into being a Nazi since she has a few moments later in the movie where she seems to have sympathy for Indy, experiences regret for her actions, and actively screws Donovan and the Nazis over, but we don’t really know much about her outside of that. She’s a bit of a wildcard and difficult to pin down, so I could never get that invested in her character. Either way, it’s because of her deception that Indy and Henry get captured and it’s officially revealed that Donovan is working with the Nazis to recover the Holy Grail.
They steal the Grail Diary but the map pages are missing because Indy ripped them out and gave them to Marcus. Marcus then called for Sallah (played again by John Rhys-Davies) who met him in the city of Iskenderun which sits upon the ruins of the city of Alexandretta which was revealed earlier to be the starting place for following the map to the Grail. Indy boasts that Marcus is a skilled man who will be able to disappear into any crowd and could find the Grail on his own to throw his enemies off guard, but as it turns out, Marcus is kind of a dork with no real skills in any of those fields. By the time Sallah meets Marcus in Iskenderun, he’s quickly discovered by their enemies and captured in quite possibly the most creatively ridiculous way anyone has ever been captured in these movies. Sallah tells Marcus to hide in a nearby shop and escape through the back door, but the shop isn’t actually a shop. It’s actually an armored truck disguised as a shop and once Marcus is inside, the door is closed on him and he’s driven away. Don’t feel too bad Sallah, if anything it was a little funny.
Meanwhile, back with Indy and Henry, they’re left in Austria tied to a chair with no supervision allowing them to escape by setting the castle on fire and driving away in a motorcycle resulting in another fun chase scene ending with an argument between Indy and Henry. Indy wants to go to Iskenderun to get Marcus, but Henry wants to go to Berlin to get his diary back. It’s only now that Henry says there’s some important info in the diary he forgot about and they need it to be prepared for the final Grail challenges, so Indy reluctantly decides to go there. Once in Berlin, we’re treated to the lovely sight of a book burning and Indy forcefully takes the diary back from Elsa. On their way back out, Indy is lucky enough to get an autograph from the last person anyone would ever want an autograph from.
He and his father then take the first zeppelin out of Germany and disconnect the aircraft’s radio to prevent anyone from calling back to Berlin reporting fugitives on board. The German pilots recognize this fairly quickly though forcing Indy and Henry to escape on a convenient bi-plane attached to the zeppelin where they’re chased yet again, this time by fighter pilots. I like how with Henry’s character they also address how what Indiana does for a living is pretty messed up, because to him, and us the audience, we’re pretty used to seeing him kill people left and right all the time, but with Henry along for the ride, he acknowledges how all this is of course a new experience for him. I’m also left to think that if I saw stuff like this in real life, I’d be pretty freaked out too, just like Henry. We briefly flash to the Republic of Hatay where we see Donovan and his lackeys bribe the Sultan (played by Alexei Sayle) into giving them troops and other forms of support including a mother-flipping tank. I was only just made aware of this state’s existence and I had no idea they had freaking tanks at their disposal!
This also comes as a surprise to our good guys after they meet up with Sallah in a jump-cut and catch up with Donovan’s crew to try to rescue Brody. Here not only are we once again shown a pretty fun action sequence (only after writing that did I notice just how many of these are in this movie and series as a whole) with Indy trying to take on a tank by himself and even Henry comes into his own a bit and manages to take out a couple Nazis himself. One he even defeats through a method that would make Jack Nicholson’s Joker proud.
After a long, drawn-out sequence building to the inevitable comeuppance of our side-antagonist Colonel Vogel by him getting thrown over a cliff while still in the tank, we also see another Indiana Jones death fake-out. This one stands out to me however when compared to other Jones death fake-outs, because it focuses less on trying to trick you into thinking he’s dead (because by this point nobody’s buying that) but rather it focuses on Henry’s reaction to thinking his son is dead. In this moment we see a different side of him where he regrets not being a better father to him and not telling him what he’s always wanted to tell him. We never find out what he wanted to tell him, but even never knowing that information, this scene still works pretty well in showing how Henry likely puts on a facade for the sake of his son (most likely to prove to him that he’s strong) and never loved him in the way he should have. Part of what makes this scene work so well is also Sean Connery’s acting pedigree, because his delivery makes me want to tear up every time.
Eventually it’s revealed he isn’t dead (duh) in a pretty comedic way I might add, and they finally make their way to the end of the movie in the Grail Temple. Donovan’s crew is already there but they’re failing pretty miserably at getting past the Temple’s first booby trap. It doesn’t take long for Indy’s gang to get spotted and Donovan decides he wants Indy to get the Holy Grail for him, so to properly motivate him he shoots his father. This guy is just a deliciously devilish douchebag. I like d-words right now. At this point the tension shoots through the roof, especially after that scene we just had not long ago where Henry showed us how many layers he was hiding beneath the surface, and it gets the audience to care for him all the more after we see that he might die. Since he’s mortally wounded, the only thing that can save him is the Big Man Upstairs and His magic cup, so best get goin’ Indy. He does just that and makes it past three trials which are all pretty cool except for maybe the first one that’s a bit less “holy” and a bit more “Intro Temple from Raiders,” and makes it to the chamber of the Grail where he finds the last remaining Grail Knight (played by Robert Eddison) waiting.
At first the knight attacks Indy because that’s what’s supposed to happen, but we don’t have time for that right now, and the knight is kinda…out of shape anyway. He tries to pass his honor to Indiana since he ‘vanquished’ him, but right then is when Donovan and Elsa walk in and try to recover the Grail. Psych! The room is full of Grails! Which one is it? You must choose, and choose wisely now because the Holy Grail will grant you life everlasting, but the Wrong Grail will rip it away from you. No pressure, there’s only hundreds of them. Donovan starts AP-ing pretty hard (Analysis Paralysis to the uninitiated) so he asks Elsa to pick one which she does. He drinks from it and…prepare yourself. While we’ve gone through a lot of different character deaths in these movies already, this one is quite possibly the most horrifying Indiana Jones death ever put to film. It still creeps me out to this day even after I’ve seen it several times, and it’s definitely one of the biggest takeaways you’ll have from this movie.
How do I say this? Donovan basically “ages” to death. That may not sound like much, but this is what it looks like:
On the plus side, it’s immediately followed by this meme-able moment:
This also leads back to what I said about not being entirely sure what Elsa’s character was supposed to be, because remember she was the one who chose the Grail for Donovan to drink from, and she intentionally chose the wrong one for him. Why did she do that? It’s shown after Donovan shoots Henry that she’s remorseful for both him and Indy, but if I’m being honest it only makes me wish we got a chance to see more of her character in the first place. Not only that, but not long after recovering the Holy Grail we also see how Elsa still tries to take the Holy Grail for herself, so how are we supposed to know if this is in character or not? Anyway, back in the present Indy chooses wisely and saves his father as we all expected him to do, but like I said before, Elsa tries to take the Holy Grail beyond the Temple which the Grail Knight specifically told them not to do because staying in one place for all eternity is God’s ‘price of immortality’. By crossing the great seal on the floor with the Holy Grail, Elsa causes the Temple to collapse and she drops the Grail down a crevasse while Indy comes to her rescue.
Taking some of the issues I had before aside, this is probably one of my favorite scenes in the movie because we see Elsa hanging off the side of the same crevasse but since the Holy Grail is almost within reach she tears one of her hands away from Indy’s grip to try to grab it. Indy can’t hold her with only one hand, but Elsa never offers her other hand which results in Indy losing his grip and her falling to her death. After another tremor while the Temple collapses, Indy falls over the side of the crevasse as well and Henry grabs his arm to pull him back up. Much like Elsa before him though, Indy can almost reach the Grail so he’s too blinded by the potential of immortality to offer his other hand to his father. What snaps him back to reality though is his father calling him ‘Indiana’. Throughout the whole movie, Henry’s only called Indy ‘Junior’, so by suddenly calling him ‘Indiana’ he proves to Indy and the audience that what’s more important to him is not an ancient biblical artifact, but his son. Every time I see this I ‘Awwwww’ so hard and usually rewind it at least once to watch it again because it’s so friggin’ cute!
Indiana comes to his senses and takes his father’s hand, so they all can escape and live to tell this incredible story. Before we leave for real, we have a brief moment where Henry and Indy watch the Grail Knight salute them on their way out of the Temple and have a little discussion about what this experience has meant to them. Henry goes back to calling Indy ‘Junior’ again, but to me that only makes their relationship more believable. The one thing we’ve learned throughout this whole movie is that their relationship needs work, and in real life, one extreme moment like this isn’t enough on its own to create monumental change. If they want to repair this relationship, they’ll need to spend more time with each other and work it out in their own ways over a long period of time. We also find out that Henry calls Indy ‘Junior’ because his real name is Henry Jones Jr. He doesn’t just call him that because he’s his son, that’s literally his name: Junior. Apparently Indy got his chosen name from his favorite childhood pet which we saw momentarily in the Jones home in the flashback at the beginning of the film.
When all is said and done, our characters end up riding away from this crumbling temple on their horses and into the sunset. Of course ‘riding into the sunset’ is a cliche as old as time, but for me it’s really John Williams’ beautiful score that gets so much emotion out of these characters riding away as changed people. Not the Raider’s March which we’ve heard in every movie up until this point and has closed out every film, but rather the Grail theme that plays after it. With this music I really feel a sense of calm and contentment as if I was along for the ride with these characters for this wild adventure, because I kinda was, and we’re all going home together. Not only that, but it’s a great final shot to end on which closes out what’s probably my personal favorite Indiana Jones movie. Not by a whole lot when compared to the other good Indiana Jones movie, Raiders of the Lost Ark, but enough.
To me, this movie is doing what I thought Temple of Doom should’ve done. It takes the basic concept set up by the first movie and expands on it. Not only that but it keeps the energy high, the characters relatable with satisfying/believable arcs, and the tone that was set up by the first movie as well. If Raiders of the Lost Ark was the perfect introduction to this series, then this movie should’ve been the perfect ending to this series. Of course it ended up not being the end of the series as I’ll take a look at the worst of these films next week, but that’s next week and I want to enjoy as much of this series being good as I can! I suppose in the end I don’t have much else to say for this movie in particular other than if you’re still looking for a fun movie with memorable action, characters, and moments for your weekend movie night, look no further then Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.
Given how much fun I had with this movie, I feel like it’s earned itself a rating of 4.5/5 rosary beads. Since I did still have a few problems with the movie kinda like with Raiders I couldn’t give it full marks, but it is still a pretty solid film and it accomplishes its goal well.
Other Indy Reviews
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
‘Kali Ma Shakti De!’ Come with me this week and have your sanity questioned as we take a closer look at Indiana Jones’ famous/infamous follow-up to the original classic: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom!
Disclaimer:
The movie I’m reviewing this week is rated PG, but spiritually rated: PG-13
There is content and gruesome images included in this review.
Indiana Jones month continues with the second installment: Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. After the massive success of the first film that was beloved by both critics and audiences upon release, this of course warranted a follow-up 3 years later with the same people who worked on the original (not so much cast as opposed to crew) returning to breathe new life into the emerging franchise they created. Since most people refer to this franchise in terms of the original trilogy much like the Star Wars franchise including Raiders, Temple, and Crusade, Temple of Doom is often considered the “black sheep” of the original three films. While the spirit of Indiana Jones is still present in the size and scale of the production and a few fun moments similar to the first film, this movie’s tone steers hard into dark and miserable themes which is vastly different from what was present in the original movie.
This wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing having an “odd one out” sort of film that experiments more with what can be done in this setup such as The Dark Knight did in the Nolan Batman trilogy, but does this movie do that? Short answer: no. I don’t think I’d go so far as to say this is a bad film, but there are certainly far too many annoying character moments, head-scratching decisions, and scenes that absolutely didn’t age well for me to call it a good film either. My feelings on this film, as I imagine many others’ feelings are as well, are very complicated considering how there are both things to like and things to dislike in this movie, even occasionally in the same scene. Well, to get a better idea of what I’m talking about, let’s just drop ourselves into that pit of lava and get it over with.
Cover your hearts and pray to Lord Siva for protection, this is Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom!
So we open on a song and dance number brought to you by your headache for today: Willie Scott (played by Kate Capshaw). Isn’t this just how you imagined an Indiana Jones movie would begin? I mean I get it, the first movie’s intro was absolutely incredible and there’s no way we’re possibly going to top it so don’t even bother trying, but just like I said in the last review, the opening of a movie is also meant to prepare you for what you’re about to see. Also I’m not saying this is a bad intro, it’s just not an Indiana Jones intro. It doesn’t fit the spirit of the character and sure as heck doesn’t prepare you for the carnival of misery you’re in store for later on down the road, and no I’m not referring to the impeccable timing of Willie’s earsplitting screeches but that certainly does add to the misery. One other thing we see in this opening is that this movie isn’t just a sequel to the first film, but also a prequel (because George Lucas and prequels go so well together). While the first movie took place in the year 1936, this movie takes place in 1935. Why?
Nowhere in the first film were any of these characters mentioned which only further cements how little of an impact they have on the franchise, but if you are going to do a prequel to the original film, why not focus on some of the characters that were already set up in that film? You could’ve done a movie about how Indy and Belloq became rivals and how, if ever, Belloq was a respectable archeologist and what caused him to fall from grace. This movie could’ve explored how Jones became friends with Sallah or Marcus Brody and the various ways either of those two characters have influenced or assisted in Jones’ archeological pursuits in the past while further developing their characters. Show us sides of the characters we didn’t get to see and adventures that keep to the spirit of the original film and the character of Indiana Jones himself. On the subject of Indiana Jones though (played again by Harrison Ford), he’s probably the best part of this movie in my opinion.
What’s interesting with Indy being of course the only character that was in the previous film is how the filmmakers show just how much he’s changed over the years. The only real way to tell in this movie that it’s a prequel to the original is in Indiana Jones’ whole demeanor and attitude. In Raiders of the Lost Ark he was more of a good natured guy wanting to find lost relics for the purposes of preserving and studying them where in this film we see how he was more of a rogue intending to acquire antiquities for the sake of getting rich which is actually what he originally intends to do with the Sankara Stones when he hears about them being missing. He actually kinda goes through an arc in the movie which makes him more interesting to watch knowing what he’ll eventually become in the first film. In this movie however he’s basically an archeological mercenary, plundering ancient treasures at sky-high prices.
We also get to see how this plays out when he presents the remains of the Chinese emperor Nurhachi to his client Lao Che (played by Roy Chiao) and demands he be given what he’s owed before he stabs Willie. Despite the fact that would be the happy ending for the audience, Lao does give Indy his precious diamond in exchange for the remains, but Lao also reveals to him that what he’s been drinking was actually poisoned and Lao won’t give Indy the antidote unless he gives him back the diamond. We’re then briefly introduced to Jones’ sidekick Wu Han (played by David Yip) who immediately gets shot and killed which makes him a completely wasted character. With no backup in sight, Indiana takes matters into his own hands and starts a fight at the club (which is also called Club Obi-Wan, hehe) which makes this movie feel a bit more like Indiana Jones again.
The stunt work here is very reminiscent of action scenes like from the first film and can be pretty fun watching Indy and Willie scramble for the diamond and the antidote, use a giant rolling gong as a shield, and fall out of a window through multiple cloth awnings into the car of our next main character named Short Round (played by Ke Huy Quan in his first role). I’d imagine this is another character most people have complicated feelings for since he can have his annoying moments too, not nearly as many as Willie though, but I think what makes me like him more is Ke Huy Quan himself. He just has a natural charisma on screen that can’t be faked so I can’t be mad at him for too long even if he is yelling for no reason. It also says a lot about the writing in this movie that a child is consistently more useful than an adult woman. Either way, Short Round drives them past a random Dan Aykroyd cameo and towards a getaway plane which just so happens to also be owned by Lao Che’s Air Freight company.
So what do the pilots who work for Lao do? Do they murder their passengers in their sleep and dump the bodies out of the plane and into the mountainy wilderness where they’ll never be found? Nope, they wait until they’re asleep, dump out all the plane’s fuel, and jump out of the plane themselves giving Indiana Jones the opportunity to be Indiana Jones. Oh. Dumb. In this whole sequence of Indiana and co escaping the crashing plane there are far too many moments that very heavily challenge a viewer’s suspension of disbelief, significantly more so than in the first film. As I mentioned in that review as well, there are definitely moments in Raiders that are difficult to believe and unrealistic, but at least they look cool and add to the spectacle that cinema is supposed to provide. However, in this movie they just seem to throw out all manner of logic for the sake of having the heroes get an easy win because somehow our heroes survive two separate super high falls that were both enough to kill a car full of Nazis in the first movie but now only lightly jostle our main characters! Come on, really?!
Anyway, they float along a river to an Indian village where the residents are starving and destitute because of an ancient evil that’s supposedly arisen anew from a nearby palace which came to this village, slaughtered innocent civilians, stole an ancient magical stone, and enslaved all the villager’s children. Indiana Jones everybody! Don’t get me wrong, the first movie also could reference darker themes (heck, just having Nazis in it is kinda dark on its own), but there was still an uplifting sense of adventure and fun to everything. Here we’re treated to the image of a child that escaped his enslavement malnourished, exhausted, and wheezing to give Indy some information he stole from his captors. That’s fun right, seeing adorable children suffering? I wouldn’t pay it much mind if this was just a one-off scene or something that was shown in passing, but the majority of the movie is like this from now on: just innocent people starving, dying, and wishing they were dead. Whee.
Not only that, but most of the comedy centers around our characters which, as I mentioned before, are divisive at best. That was another thing about the first film as well, is that if it ever did dip into a harsher tone it had clever comedy and fun characters to balance it out. Here we have Willie whining, Willie screaming, and Willie screaming. You will hate her more than Bella Swan by the end of this movie. Despite these setbacks they make it to the palace at Pankot where they’re introduced to the Prime Minister Chattar Lal (played by Roshan Seth) who invites them inside for dinner. Before we do that, we get some brilliant comedy of Willie wanting to make the moves on the Maharajah Zalim Singh (played by Raj Singh) only to realize that he’s a child causing Short Round to make a remark about how “maybe he likes older women”. Really movie, did you just make a pedophilia joke? Jeez, that’s nasty! At least that’ll be the nastiest thing in the movie…wait…
I’m sure most of y’all are probably aware of this controversial scene in the movie where at dinner Willie and Short Round are served all manner of gross dishes including a dead mother snake with her live babies still inside her, what I’m pretty sure are peanut butter beetles, and chilled monkey brains as you can see here. Rightfully so this movie has received a lot of flak for this scene on account of its cultural insensitivity and also just how downright wrong it is. People of the Hindu faith have a very strict diet which would of course rule out any dishes such as the ones we see in the movie and if they were able to eat these kinds of foods they definitely wouldn’t be served in a palace, so this just seems like a cheap attempt at making a joke about culture shock especially considering that it’s obvious the filmmakers have never had Indian cuisine. Curry is one of the best things I’ve ever tasted! Put some respect on this food!
Interwoven with these scenes of nastiness is also a conversation between Indiana and Chattar Lal about the history of the Thuggee cult as described by the villagers and directly confronting the Prime Minister about the accusations made about the palace stealing their sacred rock. Of course Chattar and the Maharajah deny these claims and become offended with Indy as a result, so we end this scene on an uncomfortable note (I know what I said) and meet back up with the group later that night. During said time, Indy and Willie can’t decide if they want to have sex or not in another supposed to be humorous scene. Also, I never thought I’d say this but this is the first, and hopefully only, time I’ll ever ask John Williams to tone it down with the music. The whimsical ‘Will they/Won’t they’ have sex music is kinda much for this scene, and it also makes it less jarring when the Thuggee assassin comes out of the shadows to try to murder Indy. Again, could’ve waited until he went to sleep. He’s literally in your domain, how did you screw this up?!
We’re then treated to what’s possibly one of the most gruesome yet ridiculously hilarious deaths in any of these movies as the assassin is pulled by Indy’s whip into the ceiling fan and hanged. Again pretty unrealistic, I’m sure the fan probably would’ve fallen off the ceiling before pulling the weight of a full grown adult into it, but still an interesting image to say the least. This then prompts Indy to check Willie’s room to find a point of entry for the Thuggee which results in him finding a secret tunnel so he and Short Round investigate it together. Here they find a room full of bugs and a classic spike ceiling trap which means Willie has to save them. Joy. Of course they decide to do the whole ‘women and bugs’ joke with Willie in the bug room refusing to save Indy and Short Round at first since the lever to release the trap is inside a hole covered in bugs. Being a prequel though, the suspense is massively diluted since we know Indy’s going to have another movie after this one, so of course Willie overcomes her bad writing for this moment of brief usefulness.
This also reminds me that most of what we’ve seen in the past 30 minutes of screen time has been essentially pointless. A lot of it hasn’t involved any sort of character development (at least any good character development) and hasn’t furthered the story in any way which leaves me to wonder why it was even in the movie to begin with. In fact, there are quite a few scenes that were left in this movie which I think could’ve been completely cut out or significantly cut down such as the bug scene, the ‘Hard-to-Get’ scene, the dinner scene, the brainwashed Indiana plot point (this practically slows the movie to a halt for about 20 minutes), and much of the scenes of the group going from the small farming village to Pankot Palace. Much of the information discussed in these scenes (if any) is easy to grasp even if it wasn’t expressly shown on screen, or just completely not needed. Anyway, before I go off on a tangent I’ll get back on track, much like the movie does, when the group comes across the Thuggee sacrifice chamber which leads us to definitely the most memorable part of the movie: the Thuggee sacrifice itself.
This introduces us to Mola Ram (played by Amrish Puri), whom you never would’ve known the name of unless you paid attention during the credits, the leader of the Thuggee cult who shows us the power of the Hindu Goddess of Death Kali by ripping out a random guy’s heart, strapping him inside a metal cage, and lowering him into a pit of lava while he screams bloody murder, Mola Ram laughs maniacally, and the collective chants relentlessly. Good Lord, this scene is so freaking bonkers and over-the-top! This is also why some of the feelings that I have about this movie are so complicated, because on the one hand it does have those things I’ve been mentioning up until now, but it also does have hints of creativity and energy to it like this that can still make me enjoy it from time to time. It’s a complex love between the movie and I. Love might be a bit much, but you get my point.
Once the area clears out, Dr. Jones descends into the main chamber to retrieve the Sankara Stones the Thuggees irresponsibly left behind unattended, leaving Willie and Short Round a chance to get captured while he’s not paying attention. The reason he’s not paying attention is because he found where the child slaves are being kept. I should also mention that it’s kinda dumb to capture the village children to be your slave labor when you could’ve just picked able-bodied adults instead. Maybe Kali isn’t big on logic. By seeing this, Dr. Jones gets so angry he lobs a rock at the Slave Driver (played by Pat Roach in brownface (this movie is so progressive, y’all)) which causes him to be discovered and captured. What was your plan there Indiana? So Mola Ram gives him a talking to about Thuggee history and their relationship with the Sankara Stones, and personally I think this could’ve been a great opportunity to go in-depth and complex with his character and motivation for being evil. However, like most things in this movie, it’s completely wasted.
This movie also had the perfect opportunity to explore complex villain motivations considering how earlier in the movie Chattar Lal discussed with Captain Blumburtt (played by Philip Stone (yes, the Overlook Hotel’s original caretaker and Alex DeLarge’s father)) how the British occupation in India makes the natives feel like well-cared for children. They could’ve gone in-depth with how Mola Ram may have felt tempted to turn to this kind of faith as a result of British abuses in the area and how they may have affected him at a young age making him feel like the only way to overcome them was to do something as drastic as this. But no, he’s just crazy. I suppose you could infer that that’s why he does what he does, but it’s never made clear through the actions he takes in the film or what he commands his followers to do, and he doesn’t stand out nearly as much as say Belloq or Donovan as far as Indiana Jones villains are concerned.
One thing I do like about this scene though is how it’s brought to our attention that all of the world’s religions in this film universe are equally real as Mola Ram talks about how he intends to use the Sankara Stones to become so powerful as to overthrow the Muslim, Hebrew, and Christian Gods with Kali’s power. This to me just seems so quintessentially intertwined with the nature of archeology that I really enjoy hearing him discuss it, even if it is in the context of destroying them. Either way, to make Indiana a true believer in Kali, Mola Ram has him drink the blood of Kali which is supposed to brainwash him. He spits it out at first, and apparently no one else in the past has thought to do that before, so the brainwashed Maharajah uses an Indy voodoo doll to torture him until Short Round intervenes which gets them both whipped. After this, the Thuggees force him to drink the blood for real which causes him to have some…interesting vocal spasms. Also, the only reason that previous scene was in the movie was so you aren’t confused when the Maharajah uses the voodoo doll later.
So this is what starts the brainwashed Indy section which more than anything just drags things out. There’s no real point for this to happen other than adding an extra 15-20 minutes to the runtime getting it closer to 2 hours. You could’ve easily just had Indy fight off the Thuggee when he first saw them during that first sacrifice, especially since he’s able to do it just fine later after Short Round wakes him up again using fire which makes no sense by the way. If you wanted to make the movie longer but still make these scenes important, you could’ve had more character study like I mentioned before with Mola Ram, or maybe just show more of the characters that don’t get a lot of screentime in this like Chattar Lal, the Maharajah, Captain Blumburtt, or Wu Han for that matter to make these characters feel more like a driving force in the film. Outside of giving us the goofiest Indiana Jones moments with Indiana smiling like a doof-a-dork the whole time he’s brainwashed, these scenes don’t add anything besides 15-20 minutes to the movie.
There are also other moments during these scenes that could’ve played out more like Short Round escaping in a more creatively intricate way besides just smashing his chains with a pick that apparently no other child had thought to do which would make him seem like more of an asset. You also could’ve had Willie actually be dropped into the pit and killed, not just because I’d pop a bottle of champagne every time I see it, but also to explain why she wasn’t mentioned in the first film and make it play a bigger role in why Indiana decided to care more about the relics he finds as opposed to the money involved. Not only that, but this could also traumatize Short Round so much that he decides to abandon Indiana Jones and never travel with him again also explaining his absence in the first movie as well. I mean the movie is relentlessly mean-spirited already, it wouldn’t be that out of place and would actually make these movies feel more like a continuing story. However, we instead just get the copout victory of Indiana waking up, fighting off Thuggee priests, and saving Willie which just makes me want to strangle something!
I know y’all are just as frustrated as I am that Willie didn’t get her heart ripped out, so let’s just move on before I grind my teeth into dust. From here on Indy and the group save all the slaves and have a fight with the Slave Driver which alternates between Indiana Jones fight scene and Goofy animated short. Some of the things that happen in this scene are just so ridiculous you’d swear they came out of a cartoon. After all the children are freed though, the rest of the Thuggee chase after the group so they try to escape on minecarts. To be totally fair, and especially after the Slave Driver fight, this scene with the minecart battle is legit pretty fun. I kinda wanna hear the Donkey Kong Country music playing during the whole thing but other than that it has energy, creativity, and captures the spirit of Indiana Jones very well even if the effects aren’t always convincing. I swear Short Round turns into Stretch Armstrong during this scene.
With their enemies dispatched at the end of the tunnel they have to slow down, but the brake breaks. Indy then stops the cart manually but sets his shoes on fire in the process. Lucky for him there’s a bunch of water flooding their way courtesy of Mola Ram and the rest of the Thuggee. They escape it when they probably shouldn’t and climb up a cliffside where they find the climax of the movie. Not before a clever callback to the first movie though where Indy is briefly cornered by two Thuggee members with swords. He goes to shoot them but he doesn’t have his gun, so he just smiles and laughs. I legit laugh every time I see that. Back at the climax, Willie and Short Round run into Mola Ram and a swath of Thuggee members on a bridge where they get cornered and threatened to give up the stones that Indy has when he follows them to the same bridge. Indy, of course, refuses causing the Thuggee to close in on him from both sides of the bridge and Indy gets the brilliant idea to destroy the bridge with everyone on it.
Ashes, ashes, we all fall down and most of the Thuggee members on the bridge just straight up die at this point. The crocodiles in the river below seem surprisingly okay with only gnawing on their clothes though. Meanwhile, Mola Ram managed to hold on, but when he tries to rip Indiana’s heart out, Indiana somehow manages to grab him by the wrist and make Mola Ram punch himself instead. Okay. This villain death scene is pretty drawn out, but the weirdest part of it is when Mola Ram gets into a game of tug-o-war with Indy over the stones. Out of nowhere Indy just starts going on about how Mola Ram ‘betrayed Siva’ and speaking vague Hindi in an aggressive tone. When I was younger I assumed that this was probably some sort of trigger phrase to activate the stones and have them burn their way out of Indy’s satchel so Mola Ram would lose them, but nowhere in the movie is this ever confirmed. You’d think this would be an important part to make clear to the audience considering this is how the villain is eventually done in, but I guess they just left it up to interpretation. I don’t know, I’m just not sure Indiana Jones is the kind of movie that’s best left up to interpretation.
Mola Ram falls to his death as a result of his butterfingers during the fight over the stones, and the British army saves our heroes. Take it as you will that in this movie about India it’s the British who save the day. Oh no, but where’s Indy? Is he gonna make it? Oh yeah, he totally will. For some reason the movie tries to trick us into thinking he might be dead when we obviously know he’s not because of the whole prequel thing. Anyway, instead of running off with the remaining stone and making his ‘fortune and glory’ Indy decides to do the honorable thing and return it to the destitute farming village which is now flourishing upon the stone’s return. Willie and Indy kiss because they’re totally gonna be a couple guys, Short Round reunites with his favorite travel elephant and sprays water on them, the once slave children gather around them and the movie ends on a positive note that for an Indiana Jones movie is warranted, but for this movie is kinda out of place.
Naturally, as I’ve gotten older, there are so many things I notice in this movie now that just don’t work and make the viewing experience as a whole less fun, but there are also moments in the film that push the standard of creativity for the series and elevate the sense of fun and adventure. Does this make the movie a worthy follow-up to the first? I’m not sure I’d say that. Does it deserve to exist in the Indiana Jones film lineup? Personally, I think so. To be completely fair, I’d say if the Jones films went on for as long as they have, which they have at this point, it was only a matter of time before we got a film like this one that challenged the status quo of the series and took legitimate risks for the sake of making something especially over-the-top and memorable. That’s one thing that can’t be said for some other Jones films, but of course we’ll get to those when we get to those.
It also goes back to what I said at the start of this series of reviews, one of the main things about each of these movies is that they’re all memorable in their own way. What this movie is to me as I get older is essentially Indiana Jones’ version of an insane B-movie, constantly throwing crazy stuff at you without much of a break to it. Sure there is a bit of buildup to get to that point, but when it does get there, you can’t say it isn’t entertaining. There are still several problems with it and I stand by all of my criticisms I noted throughout the review, they are a legitimate reason someone may not be interested in seeing this movie which is completely understandable. At the same time though, some of those criticisms may also be a reason someone may want to see this movie which goes back to my whole insane B-movie comparison. Overall it’s definitely your choice whether this movie is right for you or not, but I can say with utmost certainty that there are far worse things out there for you to watch.
Even myself, I have to admit that if I’m in the right mood I can be a fan of this movie, but I can’t put it as high as Raiders on my rating scale. Due to its problems, the best I can give it is anywhere between 1.5 to 3/5 Chicken Tikka Masalas depending on my mood, but if after reading this you think you might be interested, feel free to give it a watch. If you have Disney+ as well, it’s not like you’ll be wasting any money either.
For your weekend movie night, you can decide for yourself if this is the right or the wrong Indiana Jones movie for you.
Other Indy Reviews
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark
Dun du-dun dun, dun du-dun! It’s hard to do music in this format, but you know what I’m going for. You know him, you love him, we’re taking a first look at the Indiana Jones franchise this week with Raiders of the Lost Ark!
Disclaimer:
The film I’m reviewing this week is rated PG, but spiritually rated: PG-13
There is adult content and gruesome images included in this review.
Today marks the beginning of something different, I’ve decided to do a series of reviews! With this first review, I’ve decided to take a look at all of the Indiana Jones films in order (not chronological order, but release order). Hopefully this is something y’all will enjoy, because I have a feeling I’ll enjoy it myself. What a way to start as well with one of Harrison Ford’s most iconic characters! Although, if y’all don’t like this idea, by all means let me know in the comments. If y’all (sorry for my Nebraska-ness) are as excited as I am though, prepare yourselves as I spend the next month with this series as I’ll break it down bit-by-bit exploring the highs, the lows, and the mehs of each film.
Out of many classic film sagas, that’s one thing I personally enjoy about this one. It really does run the gamut of quality from great to awful and everything in between. To some that can be something worth studying while to others that just makes it more inconsistent and odd, but one thing you can’t say it isn’t is forgettable. So many people nowadays, and ever since the first film was released, know the name of the leather-clad, fedora hat toting, whiplashing archeologist Indiana Jones and that’s because, for better or for worse, he leaves an impact on all who view his adventures. Without further ado, let’s give this film legend the respect he deserves and pop the lid off that ark to see what’s inside, this is Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark!
To start off, I’m not even going to bother going into detail on what happens in this opening because I’m sure everyone reading this right now already knows it by heart. It’s been parodied and referenced to death, and for very good reason, since this is easily one of the most epic movie introductions ever put to film. Every beat, every line, every shot, and every character is where it needs to be to create what’s honestly a pretty solid short film on its own. What surprised me the most about this opening is that it’s only 13 minutes long, and yet it manages to get us to understand these characters and their situations, why they do what they do, and be invested in its outcome. Outside of that, there is one thing I would like to mention about this opening: nitpicks.
Sure, since we’ve all seen this opening so many times, whether it be from the movie itself or parodied in films like UHF, we’ve all noticed some things about it that just don’t add up logically. Like how this ancient civilization seems to have a surprisingly solid grasp on mechanics and engineering to be able to create highly complex traps for its trespassers including light sensors, pressure plates, and advanced hydraulics. Why didn’t that one guy shoot Indy (get used to me saying played by Harrison Ford) before he had the chance to whip the gun out of his hand? The spiders seem oddly okay with being brushed away by a whip. How come Satipo (played by Alfred Molina) didn’t avoid the light on his way back through the tunnel when he knew passing through it would get him impaled by spikes? Sidenote: Alfred Molina has some real star power to be featured in the opening credits despite having less than 10 minutes of screentime.
All those things are ultimately arbitrary because, I will use the same justification I used in my Wreck-It Ralph review, the situations in this movie are meant to enhance the ideas of the story, not the details. Small nitpicks like those ones aren’t movie-breaking since the movie isn’t trying to be flawlessly logical or intricately realistic, it’s meant to be a fun adventure that pushes the envelope of what’s possible in adventure films which is exactly what it does. This does also lead me to another point about this intro which is very much worth mentioning: the point of it in the grand scheme of the film. I’m sorry, I know this review is very top-heavy, but if you have seen this movie I’m sure you know that this intro is worth discussing.
When it comes to the point of this intro in relation to the rest of the movie, it’s technically pointless. It doesn’t really tie into anything else in the movie and if you cut it out and started at the scene of Indy in Barnett College teaching archeology you wouldn’t really miss anything, but it would make the movie worse. Why is this? While yes film scenes should ideally tie into the rest of the narrative, the opening of a movie is also supposed to prepare you for the film you’re about to see. If the movie did start from the scene of Indiana teaching, you may think this movie was instead about a forbidden love between student and teacher on account of that one creepy moment in the classroom with that one student who wrote ‘Love you’ on her eyelids. So when you did get to the point where he gears up to start the hunt for the Ark, you might be surprised at the direction the movie was taking.
By having Indiana Jones be Indiana Jones and hunt for ancient relics in the jungles of South America in the beginning, you know exactly what this movie is going to be about. A mild mannered college professor who teaches archeology by day and by night hunts priceless antiquities with his whip, fedora, and rugged good looks in tow. That’s also what makes the opening of Tim Burton’s Batman so memorable as well for a three act, nearly two hour film. While it’s not nearly as iconic as this film’s opening, it does still work similarly in the sense that you know exactly what you’re in for by showing the Caped Crusader fighting off goons/supposedly killing Johnny Gobbs first and then showing him with his suit off as Bruce Wayne 20 minutes later. It’s all for the sake of making the audience aware of what kind of movie they’re watching.
Okay, with all that out of the way, let’s continue with the story. It’s also here that I realize just how exposition-y this film can be at times. Once we see Indiana Jones back at College, he’s taken aside by his friend Marcus Brody (played by Denholm Elliott) who leads him in the direction of two bureaucrats, one named Major Eaton (played by William Hootkins), and explain to Indy how they intercepted Nazi communications saying they’re in search of the headpiece to the Staff of Ra. Indy being the well-read archeologist he is instantly identifies this as the first step in a series of actions to locate the lost Ark of the Covenant, which means he needs to intercept this find before the Ark falls into filthy Hitler hands. However, there’s one caveat: the last known location of the headpiece was with a long lost mentor of Indiana’s named Abner Ravenwood and his daughter Marion (played by Karen Allen) once had a thing for Indy. Womp-womp.
With that being said, Indiana sets off to find Abner, who was last seen in Nepal, and see if he’d be willing to offer up the headpiece. Unbeknownst to our dear Dr. Jones though is that the character whose name is the most difficult to pronounce, Major Toht (played by Ronald Lacey), is hot on his trail and following him to Nepal so he can find the headpiece and take it before Jones gets it. After being treated to these films’ iconic travelling montages, we see Marion being a strong independent woman in Nepal running her own bar and outdrinking every man who gets in her way. Since we’re on the topic of Marion though, I’d just like to talk about some things with her character that rub me the wrong way.
Don’t get me wrong, unlike some of the other love interests Indiana has throughout the rest of the series, she’s probably the most take-charge and can-do out of all of them. Although, I personally wish they could’ve written the scenes that have her in them better. Karen Allen does a good job in this role and I’m in no way putting this on her performance, it’s just that the movie does its best to build her up as this strong, level-headed person who may even be able to give Indy a run for his money in terms of street smarts, but she ends up having to be saved more times than Willie. WILLIE! That’s just so inherently frustrating to me especially considering that Willie’s character can best be described as what would happen if the screaming goat made a wish on a Zoltar machine to be Meg Ryan.
With that out of the way, the negotiation with Indiana and Marion goes about as swimmingly as you would expect, including how before Indy even finishes his question about where the headpiece is Marion is already winding up to punch him, and ends with Indy leaving and Major Toht following close behind and attempting to torture Marion to give him the headpiece. Of course Jones saves her (Chock that up to a save count of 1) but while in the heat of battle, things literally heat up as the bar catches on fire. Toht sees the headpiece lying on the ground, but when he goes to pick it up it’s gotten too hot from the flames surrounding it and it melts his hand leaving an imprint on it in the process. Since Jones gave Marion $3,000 to give him the headpiece and the money has now burnt up in the fire, after both of them escape the burning wreck Marion decides to tagalong to get her money back.
Finally we arrive at Cairo where we meet Indiana’s long-time friend Sallah (played by John Rhys-Davies) and we go through more unnecessary Marion-in-peril moments. Yeah, we have this long scene of the Nazis trying to slow down Jones’ progress in finding the Ark’s location which really only amounts to Marion getting kidnapped and presumed dead for 15 minutes of screentime, if that. Was it really worth it? One thing I can say is that in this sequence we get the iconic gun scene of Indiana getting challenged by a swordsman only to shoot him instead so I suppose it was kinda worth it. After this we see Indy alone in a bar with his monkey and he gets summoned to his competitor Belloq’s (played by Paul Freeman) location. While it is a pretty neat scene in its own right talking about how both Indy and Belloq are just stark opposites of each other, I would’ve preferred if this could’ve been represented by visual means as opposed to just verbally explaining it. What they’re talking about is interesting, especially how Belloq mentions that everything can become priceless if you bury it in the ground for long enough, but I still think it would’ve been cooler to explore the duality of these two characters differently then just saying it.
After this scene and consulting an old man who’s an expert on the Ark, Sallah and Indy discover how Belloq, along with his Nazi backup lead by Col. Dietrich (played by Wolf Kahler), have been digging in the wrong area to find the Ark’s resting place which they then use as a means to discover the true location for themselves. They end up doing just that which is also when they find out that Marion isn’t dead (big shock), but Jones doesn’t rescue her after discovering her tied up. He realizes in that moment that if he did, all the Nazis in the area would just start looking for her anyway which could make uncovering the Ark more difficult for them. So he opts not to save her and instead goes to dig up the Ark first and come back for her later. True love, am I right?
They dig through the night with their private group of diggers until Sallah and Indiana uncover the Well of the Souls which is also full of snakes.
As you may remember from the opening, Indy “Hates snakes, Jock! I hate ‘em!” But Sallah being the ultra supportive friend that he is decides Indy should face his fears head on by tossing him into the Well first. All the while Belloq and Marion are getting to know each other very well by drinking and laughing with each other until Marion decides to pull a knife on him. He laughs it off at first until she’s caught by Toht and this scene ultimately goes nowhere. They show earlier in the film that the Nazis think Marion might know something since she’s had the headpiece in her possession for so long, but she doesn’t know anything, so what’s the point of these scenes? Toht ends this scene by talking in his usual creepy fashion asking Marion “What shall we talk about?” and that’s where it stops. Nothing ever comes of this.
Meanwhile, back in the part of the story you actually care about, the Ark is finally retrieved after Sallah joins Indy down in the Well and they both lift it into a crate. Before I continue, I want to mention that at this point we’re an hour and 10 minutes into the movie and this is the first glimpse we catch of the Ark which is really beautiful on its own. It’s clearly made out of solid gold (at least in movie terms) and the details on it really make it mesmerizing.
However, before they can leave with the Ark, Belloq and his Nazi crew discover their secret dig since the sun has come out and they steal it from them while also dropping in Marion for good measure. They seal up the Well so they can die, but of course they don’t since Indiana Jones breaks out because he’s Indiana Jones and Marion gets needlessly scared by skeletons because reasons. The Ark is set to be loaded onto a plane and flown to Berlin, but not if Indiana Jones has anything to say about it! They blow up the plane with some fierce resistance from an overly buff shirtless German guy who gets chopped to bits by the plane’s propellers and Belloq and co instead decide to load the Ark onto a truck and take it to Cairo until further notice.
Once again Indiana swings into action with probably some of the best stunt work of the movie as he chases after the procession of German vehicles on a horse and hops onto the Ark truck and overtakes it. It’s a pretty long drawn-out scene, but it’s a lot of fun to watch as Indy runs cars and other various vehicles off the road and even gets shot and thrown out of the truck himself. While not very realistic, Indy gets back into the truck’s cabin by crawling under it while it’s moving, whipping himself back into the trunk and crawling back the same way the Nazis came. Eventually this results in Indiana running Belloq and co off the road and taking the Ark for himself again.
To get themselves to safety, Sallah requests the help of Captain Katanga (played by George Harris) and his crew to help them deliver the Ark. Of course the Nazis end up intercepting their ship on a U-Boat and capturing Marion again while also taking the Ark again, so Indy decides to follow them to wherever they’re taking the Ark while also somehow never being caught on the U-Boat. I mean they’d probably submerge the submarine at some point on their journey to Climax Island, how would Indy have kept up with them on the U-Boat if they batten down their hatches and make it so he can’t get in? Anyway, they make it to the island where Jones disguises himself as a Nazi to get close to the Ark until he reveals himself to the Nazis and threatens to blow up the Ark. Since Indiana Jones is an archeologist at heart, he can’t bring himself to do it, and Belloq called him on his bluff in another pretty good scene showing how these characters are great foils of each other.
This gets Indy captured alongside Marion (Woo, together in bondage!) while the Nazis open the Ark to speak to God as Belloq put it in that earlier scene. At first it seems disappointing as all they find is dust, but soon some supernatural stuff starts poppin’ off so Indy tells Marion to shut her eyes. Some beautiful spirits emerge from the Ark until they turn ugly and start laying waste to these evil Nazi bastards! There’s lots of fire and lightning as each of the Nazis are taken out one by one, but the best deaths are saved for Belloq, Dietrich, and Toht of course. Dietrich gets what I can only assume are his organs sucked out of his body like in the Brendan Fraser Mummy movies, Toht’s face melts off in another of the films most iconic images, and Belloq just straight up blows up.
All’s well that ends well, since the Ark is brought to the states far away from Nazi influence, Indiana Jones goes back home with Marion who’s never mentioned or appears again in the movies until “That Film That Shall not be Named” and we close on how little the US gives a crap about significant cultural relics since the Ark is put in a giant warehouse where it gets swallowed up by the sheer number of other crates in that frickin’ huge warehouse.
All things considered, there are a few things that I have issues with in this movie, but I still think it’s a great watch.
While I did mention previously some of the things I find objectionable about the film such as how they make Marion out to be this badass when she’s really just another damsel in distress and how it can drag in some places, I still think this movie is an adventure classic all these years later. I don’t just mean for me either when it comes to how long it’s been since I’ve seen it last, I also mean in terms of film history. This movie turns 43 years old this year, and it’s just as awesome today as it was when it first came out. If you haven’t seen it yet, I’d imagine you’re probably really confused as to what I meant when I was discussing one of the most epic movie intros ever put to film earlier, but I also recommend you give it a watch for your weekend movie night this week.
As far as how well I’d rate this movie, I’d put it at a 4.5/5 roasting Hitlers. That’s just a good image for anyone of any age.
If you’ve never heard of Indiana Jones before, this is a great start to an uneven yet iconic film saga. Strap on your whips, put on your fedoras, and sit your buns on that couch this weekend to enjoy one of cinema’s greatest heroes.
Other Indy Reviews
Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
The Others
Ooo, spooky ghosties in a 1945 Jersey home! Come with me on this not-Halloween journey to discover the secrets behind The Others!
Disclaimer:
The movie I’m reviewing this week is rated: PG-13
There is some content unsuitable for children included in this review.
Also: SPOILERS!
As you may have noticed, if you’re a regular follower of my posts, there isn’t really any rhyme or reason to which movies I decide to review on any particular week, but this is one that’s pretty out of nowhere even for me. Taking that out of the equation though, this honestly isn’t a movie I think about too much. Not that I don’t like it, in fact I actually think it’s pretty good. Also, I feel it’s well acted and properly paced for a movie of its kind. In a weird way though, I’m not sure that this is a movie that sticks with me like some other movies I’ve seen, and even some other movies I’ve reviewed. Specifically with the twist that takes place towards the end which no discussion about this movie can go without, it does make me think about what I saw much differently which is very clever (especially upon first viewing), but oddly enough I found myself days later not really thinking about it much. Funny enough, it makes me think more about why it is that I’m not thinking more about this movie.
Maybe that’s just my experience of the film, but we can’t be certain without taking a closer look (and always feel free to let me know in the comments!). Put on your cardigans and take a walk out into the fog with me as we examine The Others!
Firstly, the tone of this movie is well built up to give you the sense that what you’re watching isn’t entirely 100. After all, the opening shot is literally of the protagonist Grace (played by Nicole Kidman) screaming at the top of her lungs after waking up. That’s definitely a way to get our attention. Speaking of Grace, Nicole Kidman really is electric in this role. She does a great job of making us believe that she’s an overworked mother losing her mind in a house by herself and also of getting us to like her before the ending. That and she has a great relationship with her children in the film, Anne and Nicholas (played by Alakina Mann and James Bentley), which helps drive the illusion home and make us care about them more. Each of them feel like real people just trying to live their life in peace during World War II, and while they all can have their unlikable moments, I personally think it adds to their believability and even relatability.
What also helps sell this whole film is how it’s kept focused on this one house. Nothing happens outside of the house in the film, and of course that ties into the twist later, but it also helps the movie stay focused and get us as the audience even more invested with the characters and their situation. This also makes me think how if the twist didn’t happen in this movie, if it were just a self-contained story about a woman and her family doing their best to survive on their own without their father, I think it would’ve worked fine enough. Granted I don’t think as many people would’ve talked about it after seeing it or it would’ve even been as well received as it was by audiences, but the story and characters could’ve supported it enough on its own to create a different enough fictional period piece. I know I’m mentioning the twist a lot without actually mentioning it, but that is the main thing in this movie people remember and for good reason. Especially considering that this movie clearly takes after The Sixth Sense quite a bit where the twist is the main crux of the movie and the primary reason to watch it in the first place, you can see why most people discuss it. Don’t worry though, we’ll get there in due time.
Soon after the film starts, Grace and her family are visited by three people hoping to be hired to look after the place for them. Their names are Mrs. Bertha Mills (played by Fionnula Flanagan), Mr. Edmund Tuttle (played by Eric Sykes) and Lydia (played by Elaine Cassidy). Grace shows them around the house wasting no time giving them a laundry list of rules while also explaining how her children are sensitive to light and every room they’re in has to have the curtains drawn. While this may seem like a plot device, mostly because it is, it is also a real thing. On the DVD special features there’s a section dedicated to explaining the children’s condition which is called ‘xeroderma pigmentosum’. It can result in harsh skin irritation given prolonged exposure to sunlight which can also lead to the development of malignant tumors and eventually neurologic degeneration according to the National Library of Medicine (yes I Googled this).
Another way they add to the idea that what you’re seeing as the audience member isn’t the full picture is how it’s explained that Grace suffers from chronic migraines and she takes medication to deal with it. You could reasonably assume at certain points in the movie that maybe what she’s experiencing could just be hallucinations brought about by her medication as well. Only because this takes place in 1945, I find it very unlikely that a potential Excedrin Migraine side effect would be cinematic paranormal hallucinations. Heck, even the movie suggests as much, since there’s a later scene after Grace manhandles Anne during one of her hallucinations that Grace decides to wash her medication down the drain since she thinks it could be affecting her mental state.
This goes on for quite a while, with us just in the house experiencing the lives of these people and the strangeness of random supernatural occurrences from time to time until Grace decides to leave the house. The reason she does this is because, for some reason, she tried to get an advertisement posted in the paper for people to come and help her take care of the house, but it never got published. Yet, for some reason, Mrs. Mills, Mr. Tuttle, and Lydia still came to the house anyway even though they shouldn’t have had any knowledge of the job opening. So yeah, this movie is like 70-80% foreshadowing (much like The Sixth Sense before it), but Grace’s decision to leave does introduce us to my personal favorite character: Grace’s husband Charles (played by underappreciate Dr. Who number 9: Christopher Eccleston).
Since the fog surrounding their house is so thick, instead of making it to her desired destination, Grace just bumps into him out of nowhere. He’s supposed to be on active duty in World War II, but she finds him here for some reason. Odd. They go back home together and have a cute little reunion with Anne and Nicholas, but Charles doesn’t seem very happy. Despite being back home with his family that he loves, he has this air of depression around him that doesn’t let up, even when he’s alone with his wife. Like most other things in this movie it’ll make more sense after the big reveal, but for now it’s just weird. Not one day after Charles’ return as well, he tells Grace that he can’t stay and he only came back to say goodbye since he now has to return to his duty. Grace naturally doesn’t take this well, but they share a night of passion and Charles slips out undetected.
Things only seem to get worse and worse in regards to the paranormal happenings in the house because the family wakes up soon after Charles leaves to find that all of the curtains in the house have been taken down. Since you may remember the children are incredibly photosensitive, they end up freaking out and sounding the alarm to the three housekeepers. Mrs. Mills, Mr. Tuttle, and Lydia however don’t seem startled by this revelation however, almost as if they knew this was something that would happen at some point or another, and they try to talk Grace down from a freak out. This doesn’t work though and only causes Grace to grab the in-house shotgun and threaten the housekeepers to hand over the keys to the palace or else. Eventually they leave which is when the climax officially starts and everything falls into place.
Anne decides to run away since she still believes her mom is going crazy (and you can’t really blame her after practically being strangled by her after a weird paranormal occurrence), and Nicholas follows close behind which leads them to the house’s garden where they discover some gravestones. These gravestones are scary since they’re the gravestones of Mrs. Mills, Mr. Tuttle, and Lydia! Oh my god, they were ghosts the whole time! Funny enough, this isn’t actually the biggest reveal the movie has to offer, because soon after this is found out the three of them come out of the woods and try to coax the children to come with them. At this point the kids are thoroughly creeped out, so they run back to the house to warn their mother. Once they meet up, they see that the ex-housekeepers weren’t too far behind. To protect the kids, Grace tells them to go upstairs and hide while she takes care of the ghosts.
However, the ghosts explain that the paranormal stuff that’s been going on this whole time wasn’t their doing. There are other intruders in the house besides them that could prove a threat to Grace’s family, and as soon as this is discovered we hear Anne and Nicholas scream upstairs. We follow Grace up the stairs into the room where the kids are and we find another group of people sitting at a table doing a…séance? They’re asking questions like “Tell us what happened to you” and “Why are you here?” When Anne approaches the medium after these questions are posed, the medium scribbles on a sheet of paper what looks like pillows causing another person at the table to ask “Is that how you died? You were suffocated by a pillow?” Everything starts to go chaotic as Anne, Nicholas, and Grace all start shouting how they’re not dead. But in fact, they are. That’s the big twist everybody, the whole time Anne, Nicholas, and Grace were also dead!
How they explain it in the movie is that Grace, while Charles was away in the war, got incredibly lonely and even expected him to have died in the war, and all the while she was stuck at home having to take care of two very high-maintenance kids without anyone else to talk to. So when Grace is at her wit’s end, she takes a pillow and smothers her children while they’re asleep, and once she’s done she takes the shotgun and shoots herself. Especially considering how much I was liking Grace up until this point, not necessarily as the most virtuous character I’ve seen but at least someone that seemed human and believable, I was completely crushed when I found this out. Also considering how earlier in the movie when she was talking to Charles and she mentioned that she would die before hurting the children, this just proves her hypocrisy as well which makes this a perfect blend of shock and betrayal.
Yeah, so not gonna lie, the first time I saw this I was totally stunned. This was incredibly well built up and there were clues everywhere throughout the movie hinting at this eventual twist which made it all the more believable. It also makes rewatching the film that much more interesting as you can see how many different ways they tried to convey this message early on. This is also why Charles is my favorite character in the movie since I think he worked as the perfect exemplifier of what this twist was building up to. Grace suddenly comes across him out of nowhere, because as others in Grace’s social circle had mentioned before, Charles did die in the war which is why she found him there, he was a lost wandering soul returning to a familiar place during his life. Charles is depressed and sad the whole time because, unlike Grace, he’s fully aware that he’s passed and by seeing Grace in this place (Oh, rhyme), he knows that she not only did something to herself, but the children as well. He also eventually ends up leaving to “return to the front” since souls are tied to the places they died. In the end he was right, he was only there to see her and the children one last time and say goodbye to them, but he wasn’t expecting to actually have a final conversation with their spirits. It really makes his scenes more emotionally powerful as well.
On top of that, pretty much everything else in the movie was building up to this moment as well. Lydia didn’t talk throughout the movie, not because she was born without the ability to speak, but because upon the discovery of her being dead, she couldn’t handle the realization and stopped talking. The pictures that Grace found in the house and showed to Mrs. Mills of dead people sets up the eventual discovery of the housekeepers being dead when Grace finds their postmortem photo-ops. Just the general vibe of the housekeepers throughout the movie when they’re by themselves gives off the energy that they know more about the situation than they’re letting on and are even actively orchestrating events to happen in a certain way when we see Mr. Tuttle cover up their graves with piles of leaves. The scene with Grace and the self-playing piano/door shenanigans, when Grace heard footsteps coming from the statue room, Anne and her communications with Victor (played by Alexander Vince), when Anne takes on the appearance of the medium seen in the climax and Grace attacks her, how when the children were ever exposed to light it never did anything, all of it was building up to this moment. They’re dead. They were always dead.
In the end Grace has a little monologue with her children in her arms about how she killed them, they proclaim that the house is theirs, Mrs. Mills offers some comforting postmortem sentiments, and the family that was being haunted by our main characters leave the house. Ultimately the house is put up for sale, and the audience is left in shock putting all of the previous pieces together to formulate the entire picture this movie gave them, which is a detailed one to say the least. Outside of that though, I still can’t help but feel a certain…emptiness with this movie. Let’s go into more detail with the conclusion.
While I can’t deny that there are things I like about this movie from the casual lowkey-ness of it all, the stylistic period piece aesthetic, the outstanding acting, and the consistently well-balanced tone, I feel like there was a bit of a disconnect with the characters. Not that they weren’t well written or well acted, but I think their memorability is what fell flat for me. Upon rewatching this movie, I legit forgot most of these characters’ names before having them spelled out to me again just because I think they’re less well-defined as people and more vessels to make the story happen. Don’t get me wrong, I feel like these characters serve their respective purposes well, but I just feel like they could’ve been more distinct as people as opposed to just characters. Does that make sense?
When it comes to movies such as The Sixth Sense or Hereditary that have a similar vibes to The Others, each of the characters from those stories I remember to this day. Each of them were not only well-written and served a specific purpose for the story, but they also had distinct, identifiable personalities that helped them stand out and help me to remember them far into the future. I think that’s where this movie dropped the ball a bit. I will say that it is still enjoyable to watch even just for the sake of watching it with people who haven’t seen it before just to see their reaction because there is even enjoyment in that. So taking my very specific problems with the movie out of the equation, I’ll still say that overall it’s a fun, suspenseful experience that takes you through some eerie twists and turns and eventually will leave you speechless.
For my rating, I’d say that this movie has earned itself a solid 3.5/5 “I see dead people.” Others would probably rate it higher, but this is my blog and I don’t wanna lie about my opinion. Also, enjoy this classic .gif:
(I make no claim of ownership for the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Wreck-It Ralph
Insert coin and press start on today’s review, ‘cause we’ll be looking at the Disney film Wreck-It Ralph! Does this mean I’m putting up a paywall on my blog? No, no it does not. I just needed a fun quip that related to the movie in some way.
Disclaimer:
SPOILERS!!!
Another film that just kinda happened on a whim, but one I’m still glad to be talking about nonetheless. My first official Disney film that I’ve reviewed and surely not the last, I think this movie still leaves a significant impression on all those who see it, especially those who’re game fans (like myself). It manages to blend being an homage to classic gaming culture while also creating its own unique world with fun and likable characters practically seamlessly. Ever since I was a kid watching this movie for the first time on the big screen I really enjoyed it, and while I still enjoy it to this day, I have started to notice a few things here and there that could be pointed out as imperfections or flaws. None of them movie-breaking mind you (or should I say movie-wrecking?) but still worth mentioning as they can occasionally take you out of the experience if you’re an adult like I am now and wasn’t when I first saw this film.
Of course as this will be a comprehensive review I will be going over spoilers if you haven’t yet seen the movie. Since this film’s twist is one of the things I also have a bit of an issue with, naturally I’ll be going over it in detail. You have been warned.
Wasn’t I saying I liked this movie though? Yes, in fact I do like this movie, but let’s get into it. So insert your quarters and start your candy engines, let’s punch our way into Wreck-It Ralph!
We open the film with narration on what our main character Wreck-It Ralph (played by Mr. Cellophane himself, John C. Reilly) goes through in a typical level of his arcade game ‘Fix-It Felix Jr.’ Turns out it isn’t very fun from his perspective, even if it is for the players and/or his counterpart and good guy Fix-It Felix Jr. (played by Jack McBrayer). Eventually we dissolve into the Bad-Anon meeting that Ralph is actually in where he’s describing this whole thing and we see just how in-depth the filmmakers are willing to go to develop a functioning arcade universe. This whole scene is full of classic bad guys from retro arcade games such as Zangief and M. Bison from Street Fighter, Bowser from the Mario series, Dr. Robotnik from the Sonic series, Clyde from Pac-Man, etc. Although, while it’s a lot of fun to just have the novelty of seeing each of these characters on screen together and interacting with each other, none of the characters in the scene outside of Ralph himself actually play a major role in the events of the film.
While some people could see this as a bit of a let-down, I personally appreciate the film for doing this as opposed to making the cameo characters the focus. In the end, this movie is out to tell its own story that just so happens to be in the environment of an arcade. This is what’s most important to me when it comes to movies like this, that the story and characters are the main focus instead of making the audience reenact the DiCaprio meme of pointing at the screen going “Oh-oh, I know that character!” This is also where other movies such as Ready Player One for example fell flat for me as it’s main focus was on cheap cameos with bland characters being our link between all of them. Not only does this movie lean into its own story and characters to an engaging and entertaining degree, it also took a lot of work to fully develop its world in a way that’s easy to follow and fun to watch. Although, we’ll go into more detail on that later.
In this meeting though, Ralph lets slip that he’s tired of being the bad guy, and based on how people treat him, we as the audience can totally identify with it. Although, ultimately good guys and bad guys are just how games work, especially most of these arcade games that we see, so his fellow bad guys try to remind him that there’s a certain balance in the game world that can’t be messed with. Once he leaves and goes back to his game though, we get a clearer picture of how people see him as a bad guy, with random passersby including Frogger from…well…Frogger zipping past him as they’re afraid of him hurting them in some way and very unlikable Surge Protectors stopping him in his tracks to security check him. Upon his return, Ralph’s fellow game-mates are having a party without him with fireworks, cake, ice sculptures, booze (in 2024 that would’ve earned this movie a PG-13), the works.
When he goes up to check out the scene, everyone is still super afraid of him, including Felix. One thing I should mention about Felix as well is that I like how he’s portrayed as a kind of detached White person where he’s somewhat aware of how much of a jerk he’s being to Ralph but tries to cover it up by giving him little things here and there. He just has the benefit of being surrounded by a huge group of intolerant Nicelanders who look so much worse than him by comparison. He’s the only one who decides to talk to Ralph when he comes up to take a look at the party, he’s the only one who tries to engage him in casual small-talk, and he’s the only one to offer him a slice of cake. In the end though, he still refuses to reckon with why Ralph feels compelled to do what he eventually does and what part he may have in that until the third act which makes him more of an interesting and dynamic character than just the goofy good guy side character.
However, the party goes horribly wrong when one of the partygoers named Gene (played by Raymond S. Persi) tells Ralph off saying that Ralph can’t be a good guy like Felix and can’t win a medal since he’s just a bad guy and that’s all he’ll ever be. This then causes Ralph to destroy the cake in anger and vow to get himself a medal to rub it in the rest of these jerkbags’ faces. It isn’t until Ralph comes across a space cadet named Markowski (played by Joe Lo Truglio) in the backroom of the video game Tapper that Ralph has an epiphany. Markowski, in his bug-fueled hysteria, mouth vomits that his game, Hero’s Duty, gives its victors a medal. So, Ralph (unintentionally) knocks out Markowski and steals his armor to sneak into Hero’s Duty and win himself a medal.
Once there, we’re introduced to Sergeant Calhoun (played by Jane Lynch) who I really wish had some ‘harder’ writing. Don’t get me wrong, she’s already pretty intense, so much so the movie acknowledges it later, but I would’ve loved to see her swear more and have more adult quips throughout the movie. She’s already not in it that terribly much, so it’s not like she would’ve been spouting that many lines kids couldn’t repeat, and they already get away with a little bit with her character by having her first fiancé being eaten by a giant mechanical insect. What makes this scene more scarring (though they don’t show it on screen) is that they reveal in the movie that whatever these bugs eat - they become, so by eating her SO she ended up having to shoot and destroy a horribly mutated mechanical bug version of him. But beyond these moments in the movie, we aren’t given much else beyond some watered down quips they give her which may have sounded hard to begin with, but were made more Disney-friendly in post. In the end it comes across as a bit awkward more than anything badass. Although I suppose I can’t complain too much, even though she doesn’t go as far as I would’ve liked her to, she does give this movie a nice edge.
After Ralph realizes he’s not cut out for Hero’s Duty and conversely Felix and co realize that Ralph is missing, Ralph decides to cut out the middle player and just get the medal himself when the game isn’t being played. Yeah, apparently Hero’s Duty was only played once during the entire day of the arcade being open, because Ralph never has to fight techno-pests again until the climax unless you count his encounter with the one bug that attacks him on his way to Sugar Rush. That’s one thing I noticed watching this film again in my adulthood, that much of the details in this film are cut down to keep the story moving forward. When King Candy finally finds Ralph later in the movie after being unable to do so for a while, it takes, like, 1 to 2 minutes of movie time. When Ralph goes to interrogate Sour Bill about Vanellope, it takes him a few seconds of screentime to find him.
Now, this may have something to do with the film’s screenwriters. I discovered upon rewatching the movie that one of the film’s screenwriters is actually Jennifer Lee whom you may know as a co-writer/co-director of Disney’s top modern moneymaking giant: Frozen. Since that movie is primarily a fairy tale where the details aren’t as important when compared to the characters and message, it’s likely that she brought a similar kind of energy to this film. Not to say that this is a problem, though I suppose you could see it that way, but more that as a viewer you’re not supposed to focus on these nitty-gritty aspects of the movie and instead relate to the situations, the characters, the moral, and revel in the creative world-building the movie offers. Don’t get me wrong, there’s plenty of creative worldbuilding in this to tide you over, and that’s one of the things I enjoy the most about it.
Moving back to the story, Ralph gets his medal but activates a baby bug and gets himself and said bug launched into Sugar Rush where he loses his medal and officially meets the dirty homeless child Vanellope von Schweetz (played by Sarah Silverman). Before I continue with the story, I have to mention how Vanellope can be kinda annoying which some viewers may be put off by (including myself), but as we later learn she’s a glitch and outcast by the rest of the characters of Sugar Rush in the name of ‘safety’. You could infer as a viewer that by incessantly irritating Ralph and refusing to leave him alone when they first meet, she’s just wanting to interact with someone who doesn’t see her as a mistake and wants any sort of connection with another person. Although, as soon as she discovers Ralph’s medal hanging from the top of the tree he’s climbing, she steals it from him so she can use it to enter the random roster race and get a chance to be one of the racers in tomorrow’s game.
However, King Candy (played by Alan Tudyk) doesn’t allow it and does whatever he can to stop Vanellope from racing. We’ll get more into that later, but for now just know that King Candy doesn’t want Vanellope racing for some reason. In the meantime, Felix and Sergeant Calhoun are following Ralph’s trail to track down the bug that was in Ralph’s shuttle and destroy it. It’s here that we get a deeper explanation of what the phrase “going Turbo” means. Up until now, the movie has mentioned how the characters in the arcade shouldn’t “go Turbo,” that it’s ultimately a bad thing that you shouldn’t do, but we didn’t know what it meant until now. As it turns out, when the arcade first opened, there was a super popular racing game called Turbotime, and the main character of the game, Turbo, loved being the center of attention. This is until a rival racing game was introduced and the gamers started ignoring Turbo and his game which made him jealous, so Turbo abandoned his game and tried to overthrow the new game which caused the arcade owner Mr. Litwak (played by Ed O’Neill) to unplug and remove both games from the arcade.
Quick sidenote, I like how Mr. Litwak, while not a driving force in the film, is portrayed as a father to each of the games in his arcade. He treats each of the games under his care as if it were his own child and legit hates to see one of them go, and I really like that.
Back at the main story, Ralph and Vanellope form an alliance where Ralph agrees to help her procure a kart to compete in the random roster race. What I like about their relationship is that they kinda love and hate each other at the same time, and it’s shown how they’re the only two characters that truly understand each other. It makes sense that they would bond as well as they do. They go through some ups and downs, they make a kart together, it turns out Vanellope doesn’t know how to drive so Ralph teaches her, they escape from King Candy and his officers, and they have a grand ol’ time while doing it. That is until they’re about to set off and race for real. While Ralph’s alone, King Candy finds him and tells him the reason he doesn’t want Vanellope racing is because if Vanellope becomes a racer, the gamers will see her glitching and think the game’s broken causing the game to get unplugged. Even better, glitches can’t leave their games, so when the game gets unplugged, she’ll die with it.
This truly impacts Ralph and changes his outlook on the race, because once King Candy leaves and Vanellope returns, Ralph smashes the kart to prevent her from racing as he thinks he’s saving her life. It’s shot as a really emotionally impactful moment, but now that I’m older, it’s just another third act breakup to me. It’s obvious Ralph is going to realize the error of his ways and make amends shortly after, so it’s not like this is anything especially new. Before I’m too hard on this scene though, I will say that it is the next logical step for these characters to take in their stories as Ralph is still trying to be the hero of his own and, as King Candy said, “Make the tough choices” no one else can make. While it is properly built up and effective for what the movie is trying to do, since I have seen this trope done before in several other movies, I just can’t seem to tear up at it like I used to when I was younger.
Ralph then returns to his game where he finds Gene sitting alone in the penthouse suite with a martini and he explains that everyone left since Felix never came back and Mr. Litwak will be pulling their plug the next morning. Since the reason Ralph went on this quest in the first place was to get himself a medal and get recognized by the rest of his game characters, he was expecting shock and awe from everyone upon his return and fanfare at his great accomplishment. Once he finds this though, and how he essentially destroyed his own game by doing what he did, he realizes that it’s just not worth it. In the end, he’s still the essential glue that holds this game together, and without him there to play his role, whether people respect him for it or not, everything falls apart. I like that in realizing this, Ralph rips off his medal, the whole reason he set off on this journey in the first place, and throws it away. Several movies probably wouldn’t do this since it feels regressive and makes people wonder what the point of everything even was up until now. Although, this movie makes it worth it by making up for it in character growth, which in the end is more important than any medal.
It’s also then that Ralph sees the Sugar Rush console from across the arcade and sees Vanellope’s picture is on the side of it. Huh, interesting. So he goes back to Sugar Rush and questions King Candy’s lacky Sour Bill (played by the film’s director Rich Moore) and forces him to explain why if Vanellope shouldn’t exist, she’s displayed prominently on the game itself. Sour Bill explains that King Candy tried to delete Vanellope’s code and locked up everyone’s original memory of her character to make her out to be this sort of pseudo-villain of the game. Also, if Vanellope races and crosses the finish line, the whole game will reset and her code will be restored. While everything up until now has felt like the filmmakers had done a lot of research on games and retro game culture to make things seem more believable, this is the only part where I think they just shrugged and said, “Yeah, sure, why not?”
With this knowledge, Ralph goes to the Fungeon (hehe) to break Felix out of prison whom Sour Bill put in there after Felix was left behind by Calhoun, and have him fix Vanellope’s kart. This is where Felix experiences the most growth he’ll have in the movie as he’s initially happy to see Ralph until he remembers all the things he’s been through to try to find him. He gets super flustered and angry until Ralph explains his side which helps Felix understand why this all happened. This then leads the both of them to break Vanellope out as well and get her to the race so she can be a real racer. Before I go on though, I’d like to talk a bit about Felix and Calhoun as a couple.
When they first meet, Felix takes an immediate liking to her by complimenting her looks and admiring how the game’s graphics look on her. This begins a sort of unlikely romance between the two of them which is honestly both kinda cute and kinda funny. In terms of classic gaming, this is essentially the equivalent of Mario falling in love with Samus which just makes the whole thing even more funny. Over time you like seeing them together, it’s just when Felix calls Calhoun a ‘dynamite gal’ that she freaks out since that just so happens to be the same thing her first love called her and she kicks him out. Of course they end up patching things up again because movie climaxes are great for that kind of thing. In the end though, it’s also really cute to see them together at their wedding too.
So they go off to the races, the cybugs attack, and it’s finally revealed that King Candy was actually Turbo in disguise the whole time! Yeah. Was this really needed? In the end they were already building up King Candy to be the antagonist of the movie, but did he have to be Turbo specifically? I will give this twist some credit though, unlike some other Disney twist villains, such as Roarke from Atlantis: The Lost Empire, there was a logical progression to this reveal with clues and hints throughout the film. They showed these clues in a variety of ways including how King Candy was familiar with the phrase “going Turbo” even when he logically shouldn’t have been, how his attitude towards Vanellope racing was always less concern and worry for her well-being and more anger and frustration at her potentially stealing his thunder, the fact that he was able to access the game’s code for himself, the fact that the entry point to the game’s code was in his castle of all places, and the fact that Vanellope’s code box was clearly shoved to the side and ignored before Sour Bill explained what that was about.
Although, even with all of these clues the filmmakers included to make the transition more believable, it’s still just kinda underwhelming. In the end our big villain is just a decaying narcissistic has-been Speed Racer? That’s it? Seriously? I think it would’ve worked better if they tried to keep him as just a minor obstacle to Vanellope’s goals and not much else, but upon his reveal they try to make him seem like this big intimidating super villain and I just don’t buy it. My faith is somewhat restored in this reveal when Turbo gets eaten by a cybug later, but that’ll come in due time. If that weren’t the case, this just would’ve been majorly disappointing.
Vanellope does her best to finish the race, but cybugs overrun the finish line before she can cross it. At first they try to escape but Calhoun reminds us that cybugs can be pacified with a beacon, which causes Ralph to remember the Diet Cola volcano. He steals Calhoun’s hover board and goes to smash all of the Mentos above the caldera into it, until he’s stopped by the newly mutated Turbo. This is when my faith in this twist is somewhat restored, because cybug Turbo is legit pretty disturbing to me, and dare I say scarier than the Pennywise spider in It: Chapter 2. They also blend mechanical cybug parts with candy pieces like in the case of Turbo’s King Candy disguise which is pretty cool. So, they end up having their own little boss fight on the top of the volcano until Ralph decides to sacrifice himself to save Sugar Rush, which Vanellope sees and glitches her way to Ralph’s rescue. It’s also clear that in this moment Ralph has sufficiently learned his lesson for the movie since he repeats the Bad Guy affirmation from the Bad-Anon meeting in the intro showing that he now completely accepts his role in life. Sure he thinks he’s about to die, but that just proves even more how much he’s grown. I know it’s a bit of a copout how Vanellope saves him at the last minute, but to be real, it’d be much crazier if a kid’s movie didn’t do this.
The day is saved, each of our heroes goes back to their respective games, and we wrap up the movie with a closing narration from Ralph at another Bad-Anon meeting discussing what’s gone down after the events of that one night. We see how Fix-It Felix Jr. has come back into the public eye by having the homeless game characters help them out on their bonus levels. The Nicelanders and Felix have also started being nicer to Ralph and even gave him a place to live along with the other homeless game characters. Of course Felix and Calhoun got married as I mentioned and without any cybug interference. Then Ralph mentions how his favorite part of his day now is getting thrown off the roof at the end of each game, because now he gets a great view of Sugar Rush once everyone lifts him up. He can see Vanellope racing from across the arcade and how much the gamers love her, and they smile and wave at each other. Sure time essentially has to stop when this happens or the person playing has to sit for an uncomfortably long time watching nothing happen on screen, but heck, it’s still a cute way to end this movie which I still like even after all these years.
While I’ve grown to see a few more problems with this movie, it’s not enough for me to say that it’s bad. In fact, there are both things that I’ve noticed since I’ve gotten older that weaken the experience, and things I’ve grown to notice that strengthen it, so it kinda balances out. That I think is a good summary of what this movie is: a good balance. A good balance between references and storytelling, between details and worldbuilding, between character and connections, and between spectacle and substance. I’m sure I’ll continue to watch it several more times in the future, and if you haven’t watched it yourself, I highly recommend it for this week’s weekend movie night you have coming up.
I’d personally give it a 4/5 Marios for the ratings I like to hand out. Surely if you’re a fan of games, movies, or both, I have a feeling Wreck-It Ralph will find its way into your heart.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Or video games for that matter)
(Yet)
Barbie
I’m a Barbie girl, in a Barbie world! Can you say the same? Well, that’s what this movie’s all about. Welcome to Barbie Land everyone where Barbies rule and Ken…wait, who’s Ken?
Disclaimer:
The movie I’m reviewing this week is rated PG-13, but spiritually rated: PG.
I don’t know why it’s rated PG-13, however I’m still obligated to inform you of its rating.
I figured that it was only a matter of time before this movie, or its counterpart Oppenheimer, was suggested to me. Not to say that it’s a bad thing, if anything it’s quite the opposite. Since this did happen to be another of those films that I’d already heard a lot of positive remarks about amongst people I knew - family, friends, coworkers, etc. - so I had high hopes going into this movie. Sure enough, those expectations were mostly met once I watched it the first time. Yeah, while I did like this movie I can’t say that I liked everything about it. There were a few moments here and there that kinda rubbed me the wrong way, but overall it was a fun experience.
Forgive me for the short intro, I’m just getting my mojo back after a one week hiatus, but if there’s anything I’ve learned from this movie it’s that I should embrace my weaknesses and sell them as a relatable depressed doll so I can massively profit in the end. At least I think that was the point of the movie.
Anyway, let’s hike up our skirts, strap on our heels, and get rid of our cellulite by taking a look at Barbie!
Anyway, we start this movie with a 2001: A Space Odyssey reference. Interesting choice. While this may seem like a weird way to open, I think it helps cement the quirky humor that the movie has throughout its runtime. The good news is that the movie also doesn’t rely on references as its primary form of humor, which is also what makes me think that this is what the point of the scene was. It also provides us with an easy segue into the history of Barbie (the doll) and how she came to be a mainstay in the lives of generations of girls. Helen Mirren also does a pretty good job as the narrator who gives us this backstory balancing history channel voice over with jokes sprinkled in to spice things up. Although, she has about as much presence as Clopin from The Hunchback of Notre Dame. She doesn’t show up in the movie very much beyond the opening and the ending outside of maybe one or two jokes in the middle. One of those jokes was totally worth it though.
But what the movie wants is to focus on the dynamic between Barbie and Ken (played by Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling), which we are then introduced to in what is supposedly an average day in Barbie Land. In fact, one of the best visuals in the movie is just the spectacle of Barbie Land. The set-pieces are really cool and completely sell the concept of this reality. They’re also just the perfect blend of creative and clearly fake.
We follow Barbie amongst the other Barbies (including yet also not including Ken) throughout the day where we learn more about Barbie and Ken’s relationship and are subjected to a real foot-tapping soundtrack. Not gonna lie, the songs in this movie are bangers. Everything seems perfect leading up to a dance party at Barbie’s house later that night where she suddenly gets an intrusive thought about death. This is what starts us down the rabbit hole that the movie will focus on until the credits.
From here on, Barbie’s life starts to go downhill prompting her to seek advice from ‘Weird Barbie’ (played by Kate McKinnon) who tells her that she’s opened up a portal to the real world which is affecting her life in Barbie Land. The girl that’s playing with Barbie in the real world is clearly upset so Barbie needs to go to the real world and cheer her up so things can go back to normal. The logic of this movie can be a little hard to follow ocassionally, especially when it comes to the method that’s used to travel from Barbie Land to the real world and vice versa, but I think that’s part of the joke. It can be complicated or hard to follow but the point is you’re never supposed to take it too seriously. At least when it comes to the specifics of how the world works. We’ll get to the heavier parts of this movie later.
With this new knowledge in tow, and with some urging from Weird Barbie, Barbie sets out on her adventure. Ken’s also there. They find out together how different the real world is from Barbie Land and while Barbie has a hard time adjusting, Ken takes it especially well. Upon noticing the completely reversed roles of men and women between Barbie Land and the real world, Ken feels so much more empowered, enlightened, and appreciated. I’d also like to take this time to mention how much this movie makes you relate to Ken. Even though he kinda becomes the film’s antagonist, you completely identify with what he’s doing and how what he’s doing seems justified by how Barbie treats him all the time. And it all started with trucks and horses.
Patented Skye Sidenote: While I can’t say for sure if it was the movie’s primary focus to create an allegory for sex and gender with Barbie and Ken, I can say for sure that it is there. Not only that, but I notice in everyday life, since Barbie (the doll) has become such a notable and iconic staple of American girls’ childhoods, we even occasionally refer to men and women as Ken and Barbie. The movie is clearly aware of this and uses it to entertain the audience with a fun romp through a quirky fictional setting while also making its own statement on inequality regarding sex and gender at the same time. We see this with how the Barbies are in control of Barbie Land (of course you could infer that just from the name) and the Kens are pushed aside and forgotten much like how in the real world men have long been in charge of most things while women struggle to be heard. This also makes perfect sense for Barbie (the doll) because ever since her debut, she’s been the one most people have cared about even after the introduction of Ken in reality, and much like Mattel’s CEO in the movie (played by Will Ferrell) says “We aren’t worried about Ken…ever.”
Eventually Barbie tracks down who she thinks is the girl that’s playing with her named Sasha (played by Ariana Greenblatt) at her High School where she promptly gets torn to shreds by Sasha’s harsh criticisms. Sasha is pretty well acted and I can say that practically all of the points she brings up about how Barbie is weakening the push for feminism I agree with as well (which I’m curious if that was another reason this movie was made: to take back the fight for feminism), although her and her mother Gloria (played by America Ferrera) don’t get as much focus as I would’ve liked. They do have moments here and there that show their relationship working itself out through the process of being taken to a magical land of dolls, but besides that they seem more like afterthoughts. Just characters that’re there to help be the catalysts for change that Barbie needs to figure out her purpose and bring balance to Barbie Land. In the end it’s clear though that the movie wants its main focus to be on Barbie and Ken (especially since they’re the only two characters that appear in most of the marketing), so I suppose I can’t fault the movie too much for having a focus and a message.
Although, funnily enough, prancing around Los Angeles in Lil’ Nas X’s Old Town Road drag collection claiming to be the Barbie gets peoples’ attention, so Mattel finds her and takes her back to their headquarters to try to put her back in a box and get her out of their hair. If I’m being honest this scene feels pretty pointless to me. The movie builds up the idea that Mattel could end up being this big antagonist trying to thwart Barbie at every turn, but in the end you could really just write them out and not miss anything except a Will Ferrell performance. One thing we do get out of Mattel’s appearance is the introduction of Ruth (played by Rhea Perlman) who we later learn is the ghost of Ruth Handler, first CEO of Mattel and creator of Barbie (the doll), during a chase scene where Barbie (the character) is trying to escape Mattel executives.
Another thing that comes across in the movie is just how much homework the writers Greta Gerwig and Noah Baumbach put into this project. They have several different archival Barbie products in this film from discontinued dolls, malfunctioning crapping dogs, sleek pink vehicles, and old flashy outfits, so the inclusion of Barbie(the doll)’s real world creator makes total sense. Not just from a historical perspective, but also from a storytelling one considering the arc that Barbie (the character) goes through during the film about finding herself and discovering who she is. Outside of that though, I just think the side story with the Mattel executives wasn’t even needed in the first place. Kind of like with the discovery of Sasha and Gloria, the movie could’ve had Barbie be drawn to Mattel headquarters because it’s a familiar place to her so she can still have an opportunity to meet Ruth instead of being taken there by executives who then try to catch her throughout the movie which ends up amounting to nothing. Since they also had a joke advertisement play in the movie about a cripplingly depressed Barbie(doll) after Barbie(character) loses all hope, they could’ve done the same thing with Ken’s Mojo Dojo Casa House. It would’ve helped keep the movie a bit more focused while still showing how Barbie Land and the real world are interconnected.
Since Mattel failed to catch their most popular doll, Barbie makes it back to Barbie Land with the help of Sasha and Gloria only to find it in complete disarray since Ken and the rest of the Kens have now taken over. Each Barbie that was in charge before is now brainwashed to be a smiling trophy by every Ken’s side handing him brewsky beers whenever he wants. I want to be mad at this, but at the same time I just really like Ken and feel good that he finally managed to give himself a voice. In the end though yes, it is very bad and uncomfortably similar to reality. Barbie also realizes this, but instead of doing something she decides to give up. What a role model. Sasha agrees with me since this prompts her and Gloria to pack up and leave, but uh-oh, there’s an Allan in the backseat! Allan (played by Michael Cera) tells Sasha and Gloria about his plan to leave Kendom before it gets sealed away from the real world forever by the almighty power of brick walls. Trump would be proud. It’s here that Sasha has a somewhat sporadic change of heart and she convinces her mom and Allan to go back to Kendom to save it. I’m still not entirely sure what prompts her to make this decision, it’s a bit unclear, but this movie needs a final act so let’s just go with it.
At Weird Barbie’s Weird House we find what’s left of the Barbie resistance, including existential crisis Barbie that we left behind earlier, and Gloria makes a big feminist speech about how difficult it is to be a woman in the real world. This is definitely where the movie goes back to the feminist arguments that were established earlier by Sasha, which also clues the audience in that this is likely where Sasha got it from, and I especially like how it uses this less as a non-subtle real world statement (though believe me, that’s definitely what it is) and instead to help connect with Barbie on a personal level. It’s in this scene that we realize that dolls are more similar to humans than anyone could’ve thought, even just as symbols representing typical human existence, and also that by explaining all this in the presence of brainwashed Barbies it snaps them out of their stupor. This is both very funny and also makes a lot of sense.
What to do now? Break out all of the brainwashed Barbies and try to reclaim Barbie Land! So with a complicated heist planned out (I know it’s an overused trope, but for me, in-depth plans and heists are just fun to watch play out) they set out to turn the Kens against each other to distract them from voting to overturn Barbie Land’s constitution and forever making it Kendom which is already pretty silly. The Kens also have a big fight with each other using sports equipment which is equally silly and they sing what’s probably my favorite song in the movie: I’m Just Ken. It’s a really fun number, well sung, danceable, and enjoyable to watch. Until they remember, “Oh right, it’s voting day!” But, too late Kens. The Barbies already voted and Barbie Land will remain Barbie Land. Womp-womp.
Everyone’s favorite Ken then storms off into the remains of his Mojo Dojo Casa House where he breaks down and MC (main character) Barbie goes to comfort him. It’s here that the relationship between the two is fully addressed and even Barbie realizes just how much she’s mistreated Ken all this time. He’s completely listless and doesn’t even know who he is. Without his bros and without his best girl Barbie, who is he? It’s always been Barbie and Ken. There’s never been just Ken. Heck, even in the mugshots they got from their first arrest earlier in the movie, the name board Ken holds also says ‘and Ken’, not just ‘Ken’. Does he even exist without Barbie? As you may have guessed I really like this moment as it makes you think a lot about how you viewed the movie up until now yourself. Personally, any movie that can get me to do that gets an extra point. Barbie apologizes to him and reminds him what it means to be yourself. Maybe it’s Barbie and it’s Ken. After thinking about it for a bit, Ken starts to believe it which makes him feel better in the end. Also we’re treated to this shot:
But wait, Ken got his happy ending, what about Barbie then? What’s her ending? This is when Ruth reappears, it’s officially revealed who she is, and she takes Barbie off to the end of the movie. After all this time trying to go back to being stereotypical Barbie, Barbie is starting to feel like she isn’t Barbie anymore. She’s spent so much time in the real world and more or less experienced what it means to be human. With Ruth’s help, Barbie decides she wants to become human after this long journey. We’re then shown a series of clips from everyday human life to cement Barbie’s transition to personhood over the Billie Eilish song What Was I Made For. Every time I see this scene, I think a lot about what I’m doing with my life and what my purpose is as well which really speaks to the power of this scene.
Once that’s done, we cut back to Los Angeles as Sasha, Gloria, and Gloria’s husband (played by Ryan Piers Williams (don’t worry, he’s not in this long)) are sitting in a car with Barbie as she goes off to some kind of appointment. We then end on the worst joke of the movie where we find out Barbie is getting her first gynecologist appointment. This joke really doesn’t work for me since we see Barbie wearing some pretty professional clothes which made me think at first that she was going to a job interview, but instead the movie wanted to focus on the fact that she actually has a vagina now which is just awkward. Not only that, but since this was so close to that emotional scene of Barbie becoming human in the first place, I feel like it could’ve been thought out much better. Either they could’ve done a softer joke that doesn’t make you feel dirty or just lean into the human empowerment angle and actually have her at a job interview or something. Make her happy to experience something that’s quintessential to human life and not just ha-ha, private parts.
But that aside, I did like this movie quite a bit.
While by no means perfect, I do still have a few problems with it, I think as a whole it works well. Allowing us to have fun with the absurdity of living dolls interacting with humans while also leaving time for addressing real world issues and emotions is genuinely difficult to do, so I have to give the film props for that. Of course this is also not a movie every viewer would enjoy, but I’m sure that for those who would feel most inclined to seek out this movie they would be perfectly satisfied with what they find. If you haven’t seen it, take a look and see for yourself if this is the right kind of movie for you, and by all means post your thoughts in the comments for everyone to read and discuss. If you couldn’t tell by now, I love discussing movies, so you’d be in good company.
For my obligatory rating per each movie I review (minus one) I think I’ll rate this one 4/5 Gothenburgs. If you don’t get it watch the movie and then Google it, I promise it’s funny and makes sense. Totally.
Thanks to commenter SeamuraiLorelai for suggesting this movie!
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned entirely by their respective copyright holders which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Everything, Everywhere, All At Once
The only things that are certain in life are taxes, death, and family struggles. Even across several universes, we can’t seem to escape them, so let’s take a closer look this week with Everything, Everywhere, All at Once.
Disclaimer:
The film I’m reviewing this week is rated: R
This post contains some swearing, images, and content unsuitable for children.
One of the main reasons I had avoided this movie at first wasn’t that I thought it wasn’t going to be good, but just that I was getting really burnt out on multiverse movies and shows. While there have been some really good ones that’ve come out in recent years, most notably Spider-Man films, this was a fad that was starting to feel overdone and tiresome for me. But, having heard several things about this film from family, friends, and the Academy Awards, I finally decided it was a good time to give it a look. I loved it. That’s about as plain as I can put it. Everything in this movie just seems to fit together perfectly from each of the separate realities, to all of the hidden visual clues, to the characters and their interactions. When you put it together it all makes for a fun, suspenseful, action-packed, and emotionally powerful experience.
As soon as you think everything that can be done with a genre has been done, a movie like this one comes along to prove to you that there’re plenty more avenues to explore. All the quirky, crazy, funny, heart-pounding avenues that still exist. This is one of the things that I enjoy the most about movies and media in general is how much variety that exists and how many different paths that you can take with ideas that seem exhausted to make them just as fresh as they were when they were first utilized.
With fresh acting, fresh writing, fresh directing, and fresh cinematography, Everything, Everywhere, All at Once is truly an unforgettable experience and one I’m pretty excited to talk about today. So I’ll stop yapping about it so we can verse jump right into it.
Stick on you googly eyes, be careful with your hotdog fingers, and let’s take a look at Everything, Everywhere, All at Once.
The opening scene does a good job of introducing an off-putting tone to the film and getting us acquainted with the main issue. We see how our main character Evelyn Wang (played by Michelle Yeoh) is the owner of a failing laundromat that’s in the midst of being audited, her husband Waymond (played by Ke Huy Quan) is trying to serve her divorce papers, her daughter Joy (played by Stephanie Hsu) has distanced herself from her mother, and her father Gong-Gong (played by James Hong) is suffering from dementia and will likely die soon. This is definitely a lot of information to take in at first, and much of it is pretty heavy, but the movie does a very good job of condensing this information into the first 10 minutes of the film without it feeling overwhelming or hard to follow. If anything, the hectic feeling these first 10 minutes have really allows the audience to feel the extent to which Evelyn’s life seems to be crumbling around her. Even if you’re not exactly invested in Evelyn and her family’s struggles just yet, the movie takes its time setting up their situations and giving each character the appropriate amount of time they need to express themselves. Don’t worry, if you aren’t invested now, rest assured you’ll be crying later. I was.
Once at the IRS building, after establishing future plot threads, to discuss their audit, we’re officially introduced to the concept of the multiverse when Waymond starts acting strange in the elevator. He opens his umbrella with bagels on it (specifically bagels because that’ll become important later) to cover up the elevator camera and explain to Evelyn what she needs to do. Of course, nobody has any idea what’s going on, but after Waymond puts some strange devices on Evelyn’s ears, she gets a flashback of her entire life up until now further cementing that what she’s experiencing is actually real. Waymond writes down some instructions for her to follow after the meeting starts and things seem to go back to normal. This will not be the case for the rest of the movie, but that’s partly why I like it so much because it is so frickin’ weird.
Finally at the meeting we’re introduced to the IRS agent that’s been put in charge of Evelyn’s case: Deirdre Beaubeirdre (played by the original scream queen herself, Jamie Lee Curtis (Don’t worry, she’s still got it)). Deirdre doesn’t seem particularly pleased with Evelyn, and also doesn’t seem to be the kind of character who would be particularly pleased with anything, but Evelyn decides to follow Waymond’s instructions while Deirdre is distracted. This causes her to be forced into an alternate reality where instead of going to her scheduled audit appointment, she went into the nearest janitor’s closet where we’re officially introduced to Alpha Waymond who is an alternate version of Waymond but is merely using Prime Waymond’s body to communicate to Evelyn. As it turns out, people from Alpha Waymond’s universe have discovered the ability to jump from universe to universe and experience what their alternate selves are experiencing. In the process though, they’ve uncovered an all-powerful evil called Jobu Tupaki, and it’s up to Evelyn to defeat it.
Yeah, these early scenes of them in the IRS building are the most explain-y portions of the movie, but I kinda forgive it. The main reason being that these explanations are interwoven with what’s taking place back in Evelyn’s prime universe at the audit appointment which makes it more interesting. I say this because Deirdre says to Evelyn in her prime universe that “Nothing is more important than the conversation that we’re having right now” as it seems like Evelyn isn’t paying attention to her, but back in the alternate universe, Alpha Waymond tells her the same thing. Alpha Waymond is ultimately correct, especially if the fate of the multiverse is at stake, but it speaks to the movie’s talent that while I agree with Alpha Waymond the multiverse deserves to be saved, I still was nervous that Evelyn’s audit would get screwed up because of all of this. If the multiverse is literally crumbling due to a supernatural evil, but you still get me to care about complicated fine print, you’re clearly doing something right.
After the multiverse is officially unpacked, Alpha Waymond and Evelyn are attacked by Alpha Deirdre which snaps Evelyn back to her prime universe. Prime Deirdre decides to give Evelyn one last chance to get her crap together, but after the appointment is over, Evelyn sees Deirdre approach her from across the floor. Since Evelyn doesn’t know if this is Alpha Deirdre or Prime Deirdre, she panics and punches her in the face when she gets too close. It turns out it was Prime Deirdre, which means Evelyn dun messed up, so Deirdre calls security on her. When they get there, Alpha Waymond has himself a little chapstick snack (yes, he eats a stick of chapstick) and whoops all of them with his fanny-pack.
Might I also take a second to add that the action in this movie is very well done. It really immerses you in the moment allowing you to feel every hit that ever character takes while also throwing in a little humor on the side. Most of the humor in these scenes are visual gags. Just saying how Alpha Waymond destroyed an entire squad of security guards with a fanny-pack is pretty funny on its own, but there’s also a guy in this movie who gets beaten down with a pair of extra-long, extra-strong dildos. I won’t show you a picture of that. I want to keep this blog. Although, now you definitely have a better idea of what I mean when I say this movie gets pretty weird.
So what have we learned? By doing random weird things you can tap into another universe where you’re a martial arts champion. Well, once Alpha Deirdre shows her face again and tries to attack Evelyn after this bit of fun with the security guards, Evelyn is able to do just that and defeat her with relative ease. Although, this attracts the attention of the dreaded Jobu Tupaki who finally shows herself to our heroes and it’s revealed to be Evelyn’s daughter Joy! Twist! So now Evelyn is forced to make a difficult decision: either save the multiverse and kill her daughter, or spare her daughter and doom the multiverse. Both undesirable in their own ways.
How did this happen? As it turns out, Alpha Evelyn is the one who discovered how to jump from universe to universe and started testing out this technology on younger, more gifted, subjects. One of those subjects that proved to be the most promising was her own daughter Joy whom she pushed to the limit to try to make a breakthrough. Instead she ended up creating Jobu Tupaki, a being who’s unstuck from any universe, can travel freely between all of them, and now will stop at nothing to find the perfect Evelyn. She’s killed every Evelyn she’s come across, including Alpha Evelyn, and now Prime Evelyn shows the most promise.
Along the way, Jobu Tupaki has gotten pretty bored of endless realities, and one day decided to put everything on a bagel. Literally everything. Credit card numbers, pillows, houses, viruses, books, music, clothes, humans, animals, elements, sesame seeds, poppy seeds, you name it. Everything on a bagel, and this is what’s destroying the multiverse: a bagel. See just how surreally funny this movie is? Either way, now that Jobu has discovered her perfect Evelyn, the one who’s the worst version of herself with dozens of dashed dreams and squandered opportunities, Jobu now feels like she has someone she can relate to. So she shows her the bagel.
Upon entering the bagel and seeing…the truth I guess, Evelyn is able to tap into all of the alternate universes she’s connected with up until now and become unstuck herself from all of them, just like Jobu. In these universes, she at first follows Jobu’s example and takes a nihilistic approach to all of them. The thing about Evelyn though is that through the failures she’s experienced in her prime universe, she’s able to pull herself out of the cynicism and apathy and instead find the silver lining in all of it: her family. This is where we get to learn the most about each of her family members and also leads us to the most emotional moments of the movie.
Up first is Waymond and Evelyn’s struggling relationship. The reason why Waymond served Evelyn those divorce papers wasn’t because he actually wanted to divorce her, but because Evelyn is so caught up in her work and other life struggles that she doesn’t pay attention to Waymond unless it’s an emergency. We also see, since Evelyn is now unstuck in the multiverse, in an alternate universe where Evelyn actually rejected Waymond and instead became a professional martial artist for film and TV who makes a ton of money, she eventually meets back up with Waymond at the screening for her new film (funnily enough, the film is just the events of Evelyn’s prime universe playing out in real time). There, Waymond wants to try to get back together with Evelyn, but since she knows that in her own universe marrying Waymond led her to the failing laundromat, she rejects him again. She tells him that she doesn’t want to go down that road and doesn’t want to be a failure just doing laundry and taxes all day, but Waymond replies that in another life, even if he or Evelyn aren’t successful or rich, he would’ve loved doing laundry and taxes with her all day just so long as he could be with her.
…Yeah, this is usually where the tears start.
Did you forget Jobu Tupaki is still a thing?! Yeah, because she isn’t having any of this sappy crap and turns all of her forces against Evelyn which is when another important realization is made. This all takes place back in Evelyn’s prime universe where Prime Waymond tells her that he doesn’t want to see anyone fighting anymore, so Evelyn decides to improvise. Instead of fighting, Evelyn chooses to kill her enemies with kindness. One of the notable enemies among the ranks is Alpha Gong-Gong who is now pulling out all the stops to prevent Evelyn from sparing Jobu Tupaki.
I kinda forgot to mention him earlier, but what happened is that Alpha Gong-Gong originally came into play to assist Evelyn in killing Jobu Tupaki, but when Evelyn couldn’t bring herself to kill Joy, Alpha Gong-Gong decided to take Evelyn out of the picture in order to prevent her from potentially becoming influenced by Jobu Tupaki’s bagel (which eventually she did). Alpha Gong-Gong traps Evelyn with his newly constructed mech armor, which this whole moment is also a subtle allusion to how in Evelyn’s prime universe Gong-Gong disowned her for marrying Waymond, and Evelyn tells him off for the first time. Up until now, Gong-Gong has been pretty callous towards his daughter, and this is where Evelyn tells him that she’s not going to let what happened to her happen to Joy. Evelyn is going to be there for her daughter, unlike what her father did for her in her hour of need. This is what convinces Alpha Gong-Gong to come around and help Evelyn save Joy.
Now it’s Joy’s turn, and they go through several different universes to settle their differences, often with armed combat. Evelyn is forced to face every mistake she’s made in Joy’s life and what’s led her to this point in the first place. They also spend some time as rocks. This is one of the universes that exists where the conditions weren’t just right in order for life to form, so the only thing that exists is rocks. It’s in this scene that both Joy and Evelyn relax and realize what’s most important to both of them, and in the process Evelyn does what she can to connect with Joy. It’s weird, but I think this is the first time I’ve ever felt moved by staring at rocks. This moment alone is so silly, cute, and sad at the same time my body physically reacts to it every time I see it.
What’s really cool about Evelyn and Joy making amends with each other is that while each of the other scenes involving Evelyn making amends with her family took place across universes, in this case, since Joy is Jobu Tupaki and unstuck from the multiverse, every universe they interact in is relevant to their situation. Literally everything is happening everywhere, all at once in the case of these two characters putting aside their differences. It also gives their connection much more of a dramatic weight and helps us as the audience feel for them all the more.
Eventually Joy caves in and instead of giving herself over to the bagel, she finds herself comfortable in her family’s arms again. This results in the fractured multiverse being restored and Jobu Tupaki being defeated. Defeated in the sense that she’s once again found peace in her prime universe and her power of swapping between universes at will has been subdued, finally proving that all you have to do to save the world is love people. John Lennon was right.
After things are restored, we get a brief denouement involving the family going back to the IRS building the following day to finish filing the necessary paperwork with Deirdre. The fate of our characters is uncertain after the end of the film since it ends rather abruptly with Deirdre asking Evelyn if she’s paying attention before the credits roll, but the impact this film will have on you is certainly going to be a lasting one.
Even after only seeing this film a handful of times for this review, I can’t seem to get it out of my head. Sure some of the storytelling tropes in this film are a bit standard, but to me that only becomes a problem if nothing new is done with it. In my opinion, this movie takes things such as family struggle tropes, multiverse tropes, sci-fi adventure tropes, and action tropes and combines them in a way that’s unique, unexpected, unforgettable, and surreally creative. The average viewer that comes into the cinema to see this movie is likely not expecting to see all of these elements together in the same movie which is what gives this movie as much staying power as it has.
Taking the writing and storytelling tropes out of the picture, there are still several elements in this movie to appreciate. The acting is on point, the camerawork is stunning, the editing and effects are mind-blowing, the stunts are a spectacle, and the characters are disgustingly relatable and likable. Surely a film like this is bound to become a film history classic in this and every other universe, and if you’re looking for a film for this weekend movie night, look no further than Everything, Everywhere, All at Once.
For my obligatory rating that I give each film and show I review (except one), this will be my first time awarding a movie a 5/5 googly rocks, because you know what…
.
.
.
This movie rocks.
Thank you to commenter KyrionKrackle for suggesting this movie!
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders, which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Avatar: The Last Airbender
Water, Earth, Fire, Air. It all comes together in the original series that won over so many people to defeat evil, so yip-yip your way into this one with me this week!
Disclaimer:
SPOILERS!!!!
To be honest, this review kinda started as an accident. I never intended to watch this show for a review this week, but my sister who’d been away in Japan for a year-and-a-half came back. Since my usual review system is to watch whatever it is I’m reviewing on my big-screen TV I didn’t want to bother my sister with my nonsense, so I decided to watch something that was watchable on my phone instead. On top of that, I had been reminded earlier last week that I’ve been needing to watch this show on account of all of the praise I’ve heard people give it over the years, so I decided to give it a go. Needless to say, I can see why people love it.
When I was a kid I had a very weak reason for not wanting to watch this show. In fact, it’s kinda embarrassing. I mistook the show for the M. Night Shyamalan film. Ew! Now I thankfully see how layered, well-written, beautifully animated, and charmingly acted it is. For a show that was made for kids it feels much more like it was made for adults first and kids second. Its characters are deep and complex, its worldbuilding simple yet interesting, and its story a wonderful balance between fun, suspenseful, dark, and humorous. Of course it’s no stranger to corny or awkward moments like any other project, but on the whole, it is a very fun ride that I strongly recommend. There’s a lot of show to cover, so I’ll cut this intro here and get right to it.
Let’s see what happens when you blend late 90s anime and late 90s American cartoons in Avatar: The Last Airbender.
“Water, Earth, Fire, Air. Long ago the four nations lived together in harmony. Then, everything changed when the Fire Nation attacked. Only the Avatar, master of all four elements, could stop them, but when the world needed him most, he vanished. A hundred years passed and my brother and I discovered the new Avatar, an airbender named Aang. And although his airbending skills are great, he has a lot to learn before he’s ready to save anyone. But I believe Aang can save the world.”
Yeah, I know I just took the intro narration from every episode, but can you blame me, it’s the perfect intro to this show as it’s concise, easy to follow, and basically the entire story in six sentences. Two siblings, Katara and Sokka (played by Mae Whitman and Jack De Sena), find a boy named Aang (played by Zach Tyler Eisen) frozen in a block of ice near their home when they’re out hunting. Katara and Sokka are members of the Southern Water Tribe which is located at the South Pole of this world whose specialty is, of course, waterbending. Although, the only waterbender left in the village is Katara as the rest were hunted down by the Fire Nation while her brother Sokka takes after his father and serves as the tribe’s head warrior. Their father left before the show began to face the Fire Nation directly after their mother was killed in an attack on their tribe, and the show does not shy away from this at all. In fact, there’s even an episode that takes place in the third season where Katara finds the man who killed her mother and nearly kills him too. This show can get legit hardcore when it wants to.
But, this isn’t the best representation of her character as a whole, because Katara is actually a wise, motherly type figure in the show amongst our group of rag-tag heroes. Since she lost her mother growing up, she fell into the parental role by default and came into her own, becoming strong and disciplined as a result. This doesn’t mean she’s a total stick in the mud either. While she can be a bit of a stickler for rules, she is still kind, loving, and likable. This also doesn’t mean she doesn’t know how to have fun. On her journey she loosens up, learns many lessons, and also becomes one of the most powerful waterbenders in the world. So much so that she can control the blood in another person’s body and dictate their actions like a puppet master. It’s pretty freaking badass. She’s pretty freaking badass.
Besides Katara, Sokka is the designated comic relief of the show. Wisecracking and charismatic while also sarcastic, he’s easily one of the most outwardly funny characters in the show. Each of the characters have their funny moments, but Sokka is the one cracking jokes the most often. Unlike comic relief characters in modern Disney films, Sokka has more personality outside of just ‘the joker’. He can be sensitive, shy, uptight, calculating, critical, and even prejudiced. Throughout the course of the show though, he does go through his own arc where he learns how to become the best warrior he can and follow in his father’s footsteps, understand things from other people’s point of view, and figure out his rightful place by his friends’ sides.
And of course, there’s also Aang, who is naturally, the Avatar. In terms of the show, he’s the one who is destined to master the four bending disciplines, defeat the leader of the Fire Nation, Fire Lord Ozai (played by Mark Hamill), and save the world. I know, tale as old as time, but I think the show makes it work well in this context. Aang is accompanied by his best friend Appa the Flying Bison (played by Dee Bradley Baker) who was frozen in the same iceberg Aang was. While Appa can be funny and cute in his own way, he’s mostly a quick escape generator. Other than that, I was actually a bit surprised by how much character Aang has. When I first started watching I thought he would succumb to the dreaded main-character syndrome which causes characters to be bland and uninteresting, but Aang is truly bursting with personality. He’s energetic, fun-loving, free-spirited, yet still serious, emotional, and down-to-earth when he needs to be. It’s his story that really keeps you invested and you’re with him for every step of the journey.
But with a show like this, we need a villain. Yes of course our big baddie is Fire Lord Ozai, but for the majority of this show, Aang and his team are being hunted down by Ozai’s son, Prince Zuko (played by Dante Basco). Zuko is a troubled character desperately trying to earn back his honor which he lost at the hands of his father. Ozai banished his son from the Fire Nation and burned half of his face off for speaking out of turn. Pretty heavy. While on his mission to recover the Avatar and get daddy’s love, Zuko is flanked by his uncle General Iroh (played by Mako) who offers him sage wisdom and tries to help him navigate the narrow line Zuko finds himself on between good and evil. Eventually Zuko, with the help of his uncle Iroh, chooses the path of good and helps Aang and his friends to defeat his father, but that isn’t until the third and final season. The show does a great job of making Zuko’s transformation from evil to good believable and realistic by depicting him doing several evil and good things (since he’s also the renegade named ‘The Blue Spirit’ secretly helping the Avatar), tearing himself apart mentally over which path he should choose, making us feel for his and his uncle’s relationship, and showing how little his former enemies are willing to trust him once he decides to switch sides.
The show also has a special way of showing how the hero Aang and the villain Zuko are similar by tying their motivations together. We find out in the show that once Aang discovered that he was the Avatar 100 years prior to when the show takes place, he couldn’t take the pressure and decides to run away with Appa which is when he eventually gets lost at sea and trapped in the iceberg. Aang still feels a lot of guilt about that part of his past, and we find out that ultimately he and Zuko are fighting for the same reason: redemption. Zuko wants to redeem himself to his father by capturing the Avatar and restoring his honor, and Aang wants to redeem himself to the world by mastering the four elements and restoring peace. Another interesting little tidbit further hammering home that Aang and Zuko are two sides of the same coin is the first letter of their names. A and Z, the first and last letters of the alphabet. Maybe a bit silly, but still kinda cool to me.
For a show that’s as long as it is, it doesn’t feel like it has any filler either. Some moments in Avatar: The Last Airbender come close to feeling like filler, but the vast majority of the episodes feel well crafted and intentional to the story. To give the show a bit more tension and to keep things moving forward, it presents the idea of this comet called ‘Sozin’s Comet’ named after the Fire Lord who discovered it. When it travels across the planet, it endows firebenders with unfathomable power that can allow the Fire Lord to destroy the world. As a result, the show always has every episode moving some aspect of the story forward, even if it is just character development, to prevent the Fire Lord from carrying out his evil plans. Even some characters that may seem like throwaway characters in the moment eventually come back into the story in meaningful ways to impact the outcome of the battle with the Fire Lord which is really cool. Imagine if the same thing happened in something like Bleach where all of the Bounts that survived came back in the Arrancar Arc to either help the protagonists or join forces with the antagonists. It would actually feel like those characters had a reason for existing.
Eventually, after a long game of cat-and-mouse between Zuko and our heroes, we end season one at the North Pole where the Northern Water Tribe resides, Katara and Aang have honed their waterbending skills, and Sokka’s new girlfriend Princess Yue (played by Johanna Braddy) sacrifices herself to restore the source of the waterbenders’ power, the Moon Spirit. Which is a fish. For some reason. Yeah, this is one of the few moments when the show doesn’t explain what really should be explained. It is a pretty emotional moment when Yue dies though, because despite only being together for a few episodes, Sokka and Yue have a totally believable chemistry together and you want to see them happy. Not only that, but Yue’s death has a lasting effect on Sokka throughout the rest of the show and even hurts some of his prospective relationships down the line which makes their lost love so much more impactful.
Then at the end of the first season we’re introduced to the series’ greatest secondary threat after Zuko, his sister: Princess Azula (played by Grey DeLisle). This birch…is completely f***ing insane. And I kinda love her for that. I’d even go so far as to say she’s a better Disney villain than every modern Disney twist villain in existence. She’s crafty, she’s manipulative, she’s cold, she’s heartless (even to her own brother), and gives me the creeps every time she’s on screen. So many times while I was watching this show I found myself thinking ‘Please let this be the episode she gets her ass beat’ and it doesn’t happen. Azula survives, escapes, and lives to fight another day for two whole seasons making the build up and payoff to her eventual defeat at the end of the third season both satisfying and uncomfortable at the same time. I really thought I’d be happier seeing her chained to a sewer grate absolutely humiliated, but she found a way to make it weird.
We also are introduced to her entourage which includes the circus performer Ty Lee (played by Olivia Hack) and the consistently disinterested Mai (played by Cricket Leigh). Both of these girls have their own unique skill sets and personalities which helps them stand out even if they're not on screen for very long during an episode, and helps us to identify with them as well. Only in the third season do we start to delve into the backstories of these two, even if it is just a bit, but it does make us feel for them more. We also discover that Mai and Zuko had a bit of a relationship together and his constant flip-flopping between sides only complicates their relationship further. Between Azula, Ty Lee, and Mai, I personally thought Mai was the least interesting of the three, but when I found this out about her, I grew to like her a bit more. Also her completely apathetic mood towards everything makes her and Zuko a perfect fit for each other, which also makes their partnership all the more believable considering their personalities are so similar.
Then worse comes to worst when Aang and his friends run out of time since Sozin’s Comet finally arrives and Fire Lord Ozai becomes imbued with the powers of a fire god and starts to destroy the world. What makes this moment even more impactful is that the Fire Lord actually was never seen in this show until the beginning of season three. Up until then he had been kept in the shadows, never showing his face, which helped build him up as this gigantic obstacle for our heroes to overcome, which he is. Then as soon as he was revealed, while he wasn’t deformed or distorted like a monster, he was still imposing, clearly strong, and intimidating. We’re also finally made aware of his plan which is that he wants to destroy the other three nations of the world (Water, Earth, and Air) as it’s his firmly held belief that the world can only be at peace under the rule of Fire, which only he can deliver to them. He also can’t help but smile unsettlingly as he reduces everything in his path to ashes which only makes him even creepier.
As the final battle between him and Aang begins, the tension is set to maximum from the very beginning with so many elements all working against Aang in this one moment. Aang has been able to work with all four elements up until now, but he hasn’t mastered all of them. Aang has a powerful Avatar form that he’s unable to activate after one of his run-ins with Azula at the end of season two. Also I’ve already mentioned how Sozin’s Comet is buffing Ozai to hacker levels, so it looks like Aang and his friends are very much screwed from the start. During this four part mega-climax to this series, I was constantly on the edge of my seat wondering if our characters would make it out okay. Oddly enough for a kid’s show, it has a surprisingly high body count which kept me thinking that the characters I’ve grown to love up until now are all on the chopping block.
Unsurprisingly though, each of them do make it to see the ending, even the extraneous characters, and the day is saved since Ozai unknowingly reactivates Aang’s Avatar form by smacking him into a rock at just the right angle. Kinda forced, but it does lead to a great finale. Aang, through some of the best bending animation in the show, uses all four elements to nearly destroy Ozai. It’s also been a big thing up until this point about Aang not wanting to kill anyone, so he ends up sparing Ozai, but instead takes his bending away through a process that was only made aware to him a few episodes prior by a giant lion turtle. That sounds really stupid when I say it like that, but…no I got nothing.
After that, each of our characters get their proper send-off before the conclusion. Zuko gets crowned Fire Lord, Katara and Aang get together, Sokka and his warrior girlfriend Suki (played by Jennie Kwan), who I didn’t get to mention until now because this show has so many layers that I can’t go over all of it in a review like this, get together, Iroh retires with other characters I couldn’t delve into in this short review, and everyone lives happily ever after until M. Night Shyamalan says “I know what this story needs: crap!”
It was honestly staggering to me how much I enjoyed this series, and just thinking about it still gets me excited for what kids show creators can give us in the future as far as story, character, and animation is concerned. So far we’ve seen many people innovate with shows such as Gravity Falls, Steven Universe, The Owl House, Amphibia, Star Versus the Forces of Evil, Regular Show, Adventure Time, and many more, and I’m sure there’ll be more to come, but I can’t help but wonder if this show was one of the turning points in kids animation history. Not to deny that there were brilliant kids shows that came before this series including several Disney Afternoon and Fox Kids shows such as Gargoyles, X-Men, and Batman: The Animated Series just to name a few. What I mean though is that I think Avatar was the turning point for kids shows in the 2000s to start experimenting with storytelling and drama to create a new wave of complexity for a new generation. We see nowadays so many kids shows having deep character studies, simple yet breathtaking animation, and several layers of worldbuilding which are all present in Avatar as well.
As you may have noticed if you’ve seen the show, there were clearly a lot of things from the story that I cut out in this review to keep it easily digestible for the sake of a blog post. So much so that I didn’t even get to mention Toph Beifong (played by Michaela Jill Murphy), one of the major players introduced in season two who is also one of the most beloved of them all amongst fans! She’s also just really awesome since she’s a master earthbender who ends up teaching Aang and travelling with his group despite being born blind. In fact, it’s because of her blindness that she’s as good at earthbending as she is, since she uses the vibrations in the ground to not only connect herself to her surroundings allowing her to ‘see’, but also further immerse herself in her style of bending which makes her practically unbeatable.
There are so many other aspects of this show that I could go into more detail about such as the Avatar’s reincarnation process and past Avatars such as Avatar Roku and Avatar Kyoshi, Aang’s long lost friend Bumi and his connection to Iroh through the Order of the White Lotus, the village that took inspiration from former Avatar Kyoshi and uses her legacy to continue honoring her with the Warriors of Kyoshi whom Sokka’s aforementioned girlfriend Suki is a member of, Commander/Admiral Zhao of the Fire Nation who also served as a secondary antagonist during season one, Sokka and Katara’s father who returns in season two to help his children and Aang on their quest, and so much more, but I just don’t have time.
If you want to talk more about this show, I would be happy to do so, because quite frankly, there is a lot to talk about. Also, it’s totally worth talking about. I’m certainly glad that shows like this exist and continue to inspire people to this day, and hopefully they inspire you as well. If you haven’t seen this show yet, HOW DARE YOU!!! You clearly saw that there were spoilers in this review and you read it anyway! Shame! (It’s okay, just joking) Even if you haven’t seen the show yet, like I said before, there’s still a lot in this review I didn’t talk about and still a lot to discover, and I promise you, it’s worth it if you have the time. When you get back I will happily discuss this show with you, and we can all enjoy some ripe cabbages together.
While I do really love this show, I can’t say it’s flawless, although it does do a wonderful job of knowing just how much suspension of disbelief its audience is willing to give it for the sake of making the story work. It does rely on some storytelling tactics (deus ex machina specifically) a bit too much, but if you are able to look past that, you will still find a show with endless creativity and passion for artistry in the end. Because of that I can’t rate this show perfectly, but I will still give it a 4.5/5 Tophs since it is very close to perfect storytelling and I still feel guilty for not talking about Toph earlier.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies/shows, I do not make them)
(Yet)
The 40-Year-Old Virgin
Alternate title: What Skye Aspires to Be, this is a film that reminds us of the values of the simple pleasures in life and what constitutes an unhealthy work environment.
Disclaimer:
The film I’ll be reviewing this week is rated: R
There is adult content and swearing included in this review.
In case you didn’t figure that out given the title of the movie.
This was certainly an interesting film choice to review here given the subject matter and the fact that I’m an asexual person, but don’t blame me, blame my ridiculously skewed randomizer app which picked this movie for me. Darn technology.
Given that intro you may think that I didn’t enjoy this film, but honestly I thought it worked reasonably well for what it was trying to accomplish. A simple, lighthearted comedy based on the simple premise of getting your middle-aged coworker a friend with benefits. Despite what it’s trying to be as well, I think it also manages to be more clever than some people may notice upon first viewing (myself included). It has a very casual slice-of-life feel which makes the moments in it feel more real and believable and elevates the comedy to a higher level as well. Would I go so far as to say this is a comedic classic, no, but what works in this movie does really work and keeps your interest. I never had a moment while watching this where I felt bored, and much like how I mentioned two reviews ago when I looked at Everything’s Gonna Be Okay, the realism is definitely the best part of the whole thing for me. There’s a lot of movie to get through, so let’s just jump right in.
Grab your big box of pornography and your two bags of sand (Why two? You know why), and let’s take a look at The 40-Year-Old Virgin.
Naturally we spend most of the movie focused on a group of coworkers working in an electronics store called Smart Tech where we meet our cast of characters. Our protagonist and 40-Year-Old Virgin is Andy (played by Steve Carrell), and he works alongside Jay (played by Romany Malco), Cal (played by Seth Rogen), David (played by Paul Rudd), Paula (played by Jane Lynch), Mooj (played by Gerry Bednob), and Haziz (played by Shelley Malil). I firmly believe that most of what makes the relationships between these people seem genuine is that each of the actors were allowed to improvise a large portion of their lines and this is also where much of the comedy comes from. Oddly enough, I think when it comes to the actual scripted jokes in the movie, they’re the ones that aren’t quite as good as the off-the-cuff jokes from the actors. Not to say that they’re bad, but that they just don’t seem to fit well with the other jokes in the movie given the genre and tone. In the end they come across as just the slightest bit off.
After it’s discovered by his coworkers that Andy is a virgin, David tells him that he shouldn’t be worried about sex, and also shouldn’t think about it. What follows after is a sequence of Andy walking along a street where there are several attractive women he can’t help but stare at, a magazine stand with covers all featuring attractive and some even topless women, only to then be followed by a bus very explicitly advertising an aphrodisiac on the side of it which keeps pace with Andy for about a block, until finally he runs across two dogs in a park ‘playing’ with each other. To me, yes it is kinda funny, but it is unfortunately a reminder that this whole thing is a movie. I was much more comfortable imagining this whole scenario taking place in a real person’s life and them facing both the tough and funny implications of it, and this scene feels less like that and more like a ‘movie’ moment only because it is very clearly scripted.
I’d also just like to get this off my chest real quick, while I’m not usually one to discuss movie theories, this is spooky:
You see, it makes sense because they both love toys! He grew up, went to college, became live-action, and never had sex. Any other movies from your childhood you’d like for me to ruin, let me know in the comments.
Aside from that, the story plays out very organically like how each of Andy’s coworkers in turn try to help him in his pursuit of the elusive ‘pussy’ which is the majority of what our time is spent on in the first third of the film. Jay gives Andy the most dude-bro tips you can imagine by showing him around the bar scene explaining how to use his ‘instincts’ to land drunk bitches (his words, not mine), Cal has more smooth moves by explaining to Andy that women only want to talk about themselves so all he should do is ask them questions and they’ll be interested in him, and David, after noticing Andy is still in a rut, gifts him his gigantic box of porn on the off-chance he would still like to experience climaxing even if he doesn’t have a partner.
One thing you may notice about all of these people is that I probably wouldn’t be friends with any of them in real life. The point behind these characters though isn’t to make them PC and likable, it’s to make them believable and humorous. While I wouldn’t be friends with any of these people in real life, they are funny to watch which should be what the focus is in a comedy. The ‘You Know How I Know You’re Gay?’ bit, while not a conversation I’d enjoy having with any of my friends, is still very funny to watch. I don’t know why, I can’t help but laugh every time I see it just because Seth Rogen’s and Paul Rudd’s improv is so believable. Although some of the jokes in this movie really haven’t aged well, such as the one about the trans prostitute. Really uncomfortable. Yeah Seth, it sounds like you’ll need to play in Big Mouth to make up for this.
Beyond that though, I also like how, from a story standpoint, it’s nonverbally expressed that Andy wants something different than his coworkers. Jay, Cal, and David are all wanting Andy to have sex, of course, but the thing is that Andy just wants somebody to love, like Freddie Mercury. Also, as an asexual person, I can guarantee you that sex and love are not the same thing. What works pretty well about the pacing of this movie is that at around the time you might be noticing this disconnect is when a new character enters the picture in the form of Trish (played by Catherine Keener). She just so happens to be a character that finds herself attracted to Andy. Both Steve Carrell and Catherine Keener play so well off of each other that I truly believe they’re made for each other. In every scene they’re together you can just feel how similar their personalities are, what Trish likes about Andy, what Andy likes about Trish, and what makes them want to make this relationship work. Part of this may be due to the fact that Catherine Keener hadn’t acted in many comedies at the time and in fact was only just coming off of two very dramatic roles in The Ballad of Jack and Rose and The Interpreter, so you feel her dedication to the craft every time she’s on screen. Also, she is pretty funny. The argument she has with her daughter Marla (played by Kat Dennings) later in the movie always makes me laugh.
What really gives Andy and Trish more time to be cute in the movie is when their first date goes horribly wrong once it gets to them having sex at Trish’s house and her kids walk in on them. After this bit of embarrassment, both Andy and Trish agree that they don’t need to have sex in order to be happy together prompting Andy to propose that they won’t even think about it until after they’ve had 20 dates together. This leads to a montage of the two of them spending time together and just generally enjoying each other’s company which always makes me smile, because if I’m being honest, it’s these kinds of moments I always think about when I think of two people in love.
Eventually though, we’re forced to get to the difficult part of when the 20th date finally comes and naturally Andy screws it all up when his insecurities bubble to the surface which results in a big fight between him and Trish. I have to admit that I’m a bit torn on this moment. While I do acknowledge that I believe these characters would do this kind of thing at this point given what I know about them, it is still a third act breakup which you of course know isn’t going to stick and these characters will patch things up and get back together in the end. On the other hand though, it does result in the best comedic payoffs of the movie in my opinion.
What follows is Andy riding off on his bike in a blind rage to go drinking until he meets up with the girl he saw in a previous scene when Cal was giving him his ‘ask them questions’ tip. Her name is Beth (played by Elizabeth Banks) and she is horny so she takes Andy back to her place for a little fun. When they start getting busy, Andy takes his shirt off to reveal that his waxing job is still on point which is a pretty funny reveal since at this point in the movie I had completely forgotten this had happened earlier so it was a bit of a fun surprise to see that again.
Soon Beth goes to the bathroom and starts masturbating in the tub with a shower hose which makes the audience and Andy very uncomfortable, so of course he has a change of heart and goes to leave when he finds that apparently his friends (Jay, Cal, and David) are waiting for him in the other room. They say in the movie that one of them still had a key to the apartment from when they lived there in the past, but it wasn’t established in the movie previously so it’s a bit forced, although it is still funny to see Andy go to leave just to see his friends casually observing his sex life. Why are they there though? As it turns out, they were just as concerned for Andy’s relationship with Trish as he was as soon as he realized Beth was creepy. What’s nice about this is how it shows that each of these characters has their own mini arcs which end up coming together by this last scene here, even if Cal does end up sleeping with Beth in the end.
Andy bikes his way back to his place where Trish is already waiting for him and our comedic payoffs start popping off in earnest now. Funny thing, Trish found the big box of porn which David never took back and of course she’s not happy about it. To clarify as well, before Andy’s first date with Trish, Cal advised him to remove everything embarrassing from his place before she came to pick him up, so when she got there his front room was completely empty. As an explanation, Andy says he’s getting carpet put in. In this later scene where Trish is rummaging through his things, she whispers to herself “You didn’t get carpet put in”, as she realizes he lied to her which is also pretty funny. There’s also this running joke throughout the film that people believe Andy is a serial killer since he’s such a polite quiet loner, so here Trish also starts to believe Andy is a sexual deviant and/or trying to kill her. She also mistakes a Mentos for a roofi drug which is pretty funny. The only one of these jokes that’s forced to me is when Trish finds a model vagina that had appeared in one of the previous scenes when Andy took Trish’s daughter Marla to a birth control clinic to get information which ended up being more educational for Andy than Marla. Why it seems forced is because we never actually saw Andy take the model vagina, we just saw him dismantle it and poorly reassemble it at the clinic so I feel like this is more of a continuity error.
Easily one of the best jokes in this portion of the movie for me is essentially the realization that all of the tips that Jay, Cal, and David had given Andy up to this point weren’t helpful at all. In fact, they were completely useless. We see in this scene how all of the tips they’ve given him up until now have actually done more to hurt his sex life as opposed to help it. Granted we were already kinda seeing that throughout the course of the movie in real time, but here is when they truly become apparent. All of the tips Andy’s been given have had some hand in destroying his reputation with Trish at this point from the box of porn, the sowing multiple seeds with different women so it’s more likely you’ll get a request for sex, to the manscaping, all of it has damaged his image with Trish. This is why this part is the funniest of the movie to me, because it also makes all of the previous scenes feel like they were building to something which is great for a self-contained movie.
Of course, with discovery after discovery, Trish can’t take it anymore and she speeds off in her car with Andy chasing after on his bike. This scene doesn’t take very long and ends up amounting to a flip stunt with Andy crashing through two billboards being carried on a semi truck (funnily enough advertising the same aphrodisiac from the bus earlier) and landing on his back in front of Trish’s car. Naturally, Trish gets out, Andy finally admits he’s a virgin, they make up and live happily ever after. This is another of those moments which feels especially movie-esque which makes it feel more off. Another one of those reminders that the people you’re watching are in fact actors playing roles and not two people coming to terms with their shortcomings in real time. I know every movie, scratch that, every story needs a climax, but it needs to be one that matches the tone of the story. That’s where this scene fell flat for me.
In the end Andy and Trish get married and actually end up consummating it! It feels genuine and properly goofy as they don’t shy away from the fact that Andy is of course inexperienced and ends up tapping out too early until it cuts to 2 hours later when Trish is completely exhausted and Andy’s still riding the ‘Just Lost My Virginity’ high.
After all is said and done, we end up having a musical number to end out the film where each of the notable characters in the story show up to sing the song Aquarius/Let the Sunshine In by The 5th Dimension which I think is fun and done pretty well, but I do have a bit of a gripe. Given the subject matter of the story, couldn’t they have done Like a Virgin? It would’ve made so much sense, especially considering that song was also originally written to be sung by a man and also would’ve been perfectly goofy and odd and in keeping with the ending they went with anyway, but either way that’s the whole story.
When I first watched this movie I had this attitude about me that was like “Oh yeah, I’m totally above this material”, you know, really arrogant and pretentious, although after having seen this movie several times for the sake of this review, I’ve learned to appreciate a lot of the little touches and small moments that do appear in the film which allow me to enjoy it more. For what it wants to be, I think it accomplishes it well. I will reiterate what I said at the beginning of this review as well that I don’t necessarily think this film is a comedic classic, but for movie lovers who’re in the mood for a good laugh and/or a relatable experience, this definitely isn’t a bad choice. I can assure you there are certainly many worse choices to make when it comes to comedy, and I’m sure this’ll at least get some laughs out of you even if it is dated.
Despite the socially unconscious moments that take place in the movie, as an LGBTQ+ person myself (who doesn’t speak for the whole community but just wants to offer her own opinion), they’re at least brief and few, and there are many other fun moments in the movie to balance it out if you’re willing to look past them.
One of the things that serves as the perfect summary for this film for me is the audio commentary on the DVD. After watching and listening to the commentary track for the movie, while there is some discussion of what the process was for creating scenes and coming up with ideas, most of the track has the attitude of just “Sure, let’s make a movie.” This is the exact casual attitude I’d expect a movie like this to have. This attitude permeates throughout every line read, every scene, and every camera angle in this movie. It’s easily what gives it its signature charm.
For my usual film rating that I give out to each of the movies I’ve reviewed so far (except one), I’d like to rate this movie 3.5/5 Kelly Clarksons.
So if you’ve never seen it, feel free to turn off the lights, light some candles, turn your demon statuettes around, and settle down with The 40-Year-Old Virgin for your weekend movie night this week.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who only talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Galaxy Quest
Hope you’re excited for lots of awkwardness and bad effects, because it doesn’t get any better than that in Galaxy Quest.
So it’s come to this. My first bad one. It was bound to happen at one point or another, but I wasn’t expecting it to happen quite this soon. Without any dillydallying from me, let’s just get right into it before I find some excuse to get out of it. Although, before I get started on the movie itself, I wanna talk about a common storytelling trope: the ‘Liar Revealed’.
This is a kind of storytelling trope almost as old as storytelling itself dating back to the Brothers Grimm’s The Brave Little Tailor where the protagonist(s) are believed to be something or someone they’re not by the other characters. They follow through with the lie either out of selfishness or some strongly held personal belief until they’re eventually caught in the lie causing the other characters to be hurt and reprimand the protagonist(s). Ultimately this causes the protagonist(s) to have a change of heart and the obvious lesson is learned that the protagonist(s) with their own unique set of skills were more than enough to save the day.
Some stories have utilized this trope well (Aladdin), while others have utilized it abysmally (Bushwhacked). Over the years it’s been proven that it’s much easier for screenwriters to utilize this trope abysmally than adequately, and this movie…utilizes it.
More than anything, this movie leans too hard into the trope to the point where everything that’s portrayed in it just becomes tired and predictable. What makes it more difficult to stomach for me is the fact that it’s supposed to be a comedy and the thing about comedy is that when it’s predictable it’s not funny. So many of the jokes in this film are just awkward and even uncomfortable to watch along with its terrible visual effects, but we’ll get to that when we get to that, and it all comes together to create an unfortunate mess of a movie. There’s a lot to get through and by Grabthar’s hammer I’mma do it.
Everyone set your phasers from stun to kill and let’s get right into Galaxy Quest. Whee…
To clarify some stuff up front, the film centers around actors of a television show called Galaxy Quest (Not the movie, but the show within the movie) and these actors are eventually mistaken for the characters they portray on the television show by a race of aliens called the Thermians who are under threat from an alien menace named Sarris (played by Robin Sachs). It’ll probably be a bit difficult to follow at first but if you stick with me I promise I’ll do my best to explain it clearly. So our cast of characters are Jason Nesmith (played by Tim Allen) who is the main actor on the show Galaxy Quest who plays the commander of the ship, the NSEA Protector, named Peter Quincy Taggert. With me so far? Okay, let’s keep going. Our supporting characters are Gwen DeMarco (played by Sigourney Weaver) who plays Lieutenant Tawny Madison, Alexander Dane (played by Alan Rickman) who plays Dr. Lazarus, Fred Kwan (played by Tony Shalhoub) who plays Tech Sgt. Chen, Tommy Webber (played by Daryl Mitchell) who plays Laredo, and Guy Fleegman (played by Sam Rockwell) who plays expendable crewman #6. Did you get all that? Yeah you did.
It’s clear that the Galaxy Quest TV show is heavily based on Star Trek with more heavy influences from Star Trek: The Next Generation as opposed to Star Trek: The Original Series. Given this as their inspiration, one of the things I was asking myself as I watched this was how much funnier this film could’ve been if it had actually written the story around the actors from the Star Trek: The Next Generation show. They could’ve had Patrick Stewart coming to grips with being thrust into a commanding role on a ship he had been supposedly in charge of for years while Brent Spiner could’ve been trying to act emotionless in a fantastical alien setting which would constantly test his acting skills and Gates McFadden could’ve been haphazardly trying to BS her way through medical school in real time.
Naturally you also wouldn’t have to set up their characters either because they’ve clearly been established for several years at this point, many people recognize them and understand their unique personalities and also would enjoy laughing at the absurd situation they find themselves in. This would also help the movie feel less run-of-the-mill and standard despite still sticking to the ‘Liar Revealed’ trope. The meta-ness in this setup would also help keep the audience invested and itching to see what happens next whether it be hilarious or terrifying. Heck, Wes Craven’s New Nightmare did this in a way that was clever, unique, and of course meta as heck which also pleased audiences well enough. Why couldn’t this movie have done the same? Well, instead of doing that clever idea, we instead are stuck with these jerkoffs we’ve never seen before and don’t care about in the slightest.
With that being said, let’s discuss the characters. Taking away each of their cookie-cutter character arcs (Oh, alliteration), they’re acted in a way that’s in no way memorable or fun with possibly the exception of Alan Rickman as Alexander Dane. The main thing about his character is that he’s embarrassed to have been on the Galaxy Quest TV show and is forced to repeat the same catch-phrase over and over again instead of moving on to more challenging and mature material. I’m fully convinced that Alan Rickman wasn’t playing Alexander Dane so much as he was just playing himself. Being a classically trained Shakespearean theatre actor forced to play in Galaxy Quest against his will, I can’t fault good casting. Outside of that, practically everyone else is bland, off, or unfunny.
Tim Allen is basically just doing his Tim Allen thing of being cast as an oblivious weirdo who goes through the formulaic arc of gaining a personality by the end so nothing about him really stands out. Tony Shalhoub as Fred Kwan is probably the weirdest of the bunch because nothing his character says sounds natural or genuine. Everything he says just sounds like he’s making up a book report in front of the whole class. Both Sam Rockwell as Guy Fleegman and Daryl Mitchell as Tommy Webber are the ones the script cruelly decided to hand the most unfunny lines to. Since Guy is the character that’s supposed to die in every episode of the show, his character is just constantly paranoid about dying in space which can get annoying and old pretty quick. Then there’s Tommy who I think they could’ve done a lot more in terms of comedy being that he started out on the show as a child actor, essentially being this universe’s version of Wil Wheaton/Wesley Crusher, but no. Instead, most of his comedic moments just involve him squealing in some way or another. Everything both of these characters say is either awkward or obnoxious.
Then there’s Sigourney Weaver as Gwen DeMarco. I know you’re probably thinking “Wow, Skye dedicated a whole paragraph to her so she must be really bad,” but honestly no. While I don’t think she’s the worst of the bunch, I just personally think that the filmmakers did her especially dirty compared to the rest of the actors. Being one of the most recognizable faces in sci-fi history for a very damn good reason, Sigourney Weaver in a comedic role like this one could really have been something hilarious if utilized well. I swear though, every time she was on set she must’ve been directed by M. Night Shyamalan or something because her performance here fits a bit too comfortably next to Mark Wahlberg from The Happening. Practically all of her lines are like a text-to-speech app feeling out human emotions for the first time, and as you probably guessed, they never get a laugh. Not only that, but nowhere in this movie can you find any sort of Alien reference. Nada. Zip. That is such a missed opportunity it’s not even funny, because it’s not funny! Spaceballs had an Alien reference in it and that didn’t even tie into anything. This movie literally has the star of that movie as one of the leads and doesn’t draw attention to it!
I’m not mad, movie…just disappointed…
So we made it through the character section, how’s the story? Well, about as good as you would expect. In the opening, our main protagonist Jason Nesmith is approached by a group of Thermians he doesn’t yet know are Thermians at a Galaxy Quest convention where we discover how there are actually actors in this movie trying to actively destroy it from the inside. Before you say it too, I’m perfectly aware that since the Thermians are aliens they’re not required to speak or act like humans would typically act, but these people act like what would happen if Tommy Wiseau had a lobotomy. They are quite easily the weirdest and most wrong things in the entire movie which I wouldn’t mind as much since this film is a comedy after all so it’s expected for a few things to be exaggerated for the sake of humor, but the thing is that we’re supposed to empathize with them and feel sorry for the situation they find themselves in. It’s kind of hard to take them seriously when they look, sound, and act like children desperately trying to make you laugh by any means necessary.
After that bit of awkwardness we’re blessed to have for the rest of the movie, the Thermian leader Mathesar (played by Enrico Colantoni) takes Jason to their ship where we’re officially introduced to the main threat of the film, Sarris. Jason, still not fully aware that what’s happening is real, fumbles his way through a peace negotiation and is then sent back home through one of these films’ mind-blowingly unconvincing effects.
Yeah, it’s about time to mention that the effects in this movie are pretty bad. The best one in the movie is probably the pig lizard that comes in briefly on the rock planet, mainly because it’s done practically and moves properly animal-like. Sarris and his crew are also done practically so they’re easily better than the CG effects in the film, but they aren’t crafted in a way that allows them to emote the way they should. In the end it’s kind of disappointing since all the effects artists clearly put a lot of work into them only for Sarris and his crew to move their mouths like glorified hand puppets. The same cannot be said for the CG artists. Either they were in a rush or they just didn’t care because it’s legit embarrassing how bad the CGI looks. The rock monster, the cherub aliens, the Thermians’ true forms, the transport pods, all of them look absolutely horrible. There isn’t much else to say about it, they just suck.
With that out of the way, Jason gets back to Earth and convinces his co-stars to come with him to space and help out the Thermians. In space is when the movie gets the most formulaic in accordance with the ‘Liar Revealed’ setup and they essentially do everything you’d expect them to do. They fumble their way through flying the ship, fail at negotiating with Sarris again, and practically destroy the ship in the process of escaping from Sarris.
At this point there’s really no point in describing the story since you probably know what it is already. We partake in more comic hijinks with “comic” in heavy quotation marks as neither the writing, acting, nor editing can properly support it until the inevitable reveal that the characters are not really space heroes but are in fact actors. Mathesar’s heart is broken according to the script, and the actors are slated to be executed by throwing them out into space. They miraculously escape because the same aliens who nearly killed them in their previous encounter suddenly turned into idiots as they all go to save the Thermians from being killed.
Here is when we get to what’s, in my opinion, the best scene in the movie. After Alexander and one of the Thermians named Quellek (played by Peter Breen) rescue the rest of the trapped Thermians, Quellek is fatally shot by one of Sarris’ men. Alexander has a brief moment before Quellek’s death in which Quellek explains to him how despite never meeting him, he always considered Alexander’s character Dr. Lazarus to be his kind of spiritual father and always had a deeply rooted respect for him. I of course don’t care at all whether these characters live or die, but what I like about this scene is how it highlights the power of art to me. It shows how a piece of media stops being just a piece of media and instead becomes something more. We spend so much time with the people that we see on screen that we believe them to be real, we want them to be real, and they can inspire us in very unique ways. That’s what I like about this scene, and of course since this movie is allergic to good, this scene only lasts about a minute and a half.
Of course after this takes place the crew of the NSEA Protector are able to overcome the might of Sarris’ army and make their way back to Earth in one piece minus the stage of the convention center they’re performing at which they promptly crash into with their ship. Everyone manages to make it out okay, Sarris is killed, the cast does a curtain call to an audience of screaming fans, each of the actors are recast in a brand new Galaxy Quest series, and I question my life choices.
I’ve never been this negative for this long, so while this might seem ludicrous, I want to focus on what’s done well in this movie. Don’t worry, I’ll be brief. At the end of the day I think the idea behind this movie has the potential to work, especially considering that it has talented people working on it, but they’re just given practically nothing to work with. Outside of a few patches of good in the movie including a small fraction of the effects which actually had effort put into them and of course that one scene I mentioned before involving the nature of media’s power, everything just feels so soulless.
To me it’s not funny, it’s not engaging, it’s not well-made, it’s just wrong in so many ways. After watching it as many times as I have this week for the sake of this review, it just gets more painful whereas what a good movie is supposed to do is only get better the more times you see it. But, these are just my thoughts. I don’t mean to say these things as if my word on a movie is law, in fact as I was looking into details about this movie for this review I came across many people online proclaiming this movie to be a sci-fi classic and uproariously funny. What I’m saying is that differing opinions on movies are normal and shouldn’t be taken to heart. In case anyone reading right now is a big fan of this film and made it this far into the review, I want to thank you for considering my opinion. My main purpose for starting this review blog wasn’t just to have a platform to talk about movies myself, but also open up the floor for discussion among all of you movie fans as well. So in the end, what are your thoughts? Have you seen this movie, have you not seen it? If you have, did you like it, did you not like it? What works and what doesn’t work for you? By all means hit me up on my Contact Page of this website and maybe one day I’ll figure out how to get friggin’ comments to work on this website so there can truly be a huge group chat between all of us movie lovers!
I really would love to hear from you all. ;)
Also, If I were to give this film my own personal rating, I’d say it scores 1/5 Tribbles. Bonus points if you get that reference.
(I make no claim of ownership for any of the images used in this post)
(Each of them are owned by their respective copyright holders which are not me)
(I am but a humble blogger who talks about movies, I do not make them)
(Yet)
Everything’s Gonna Be Okay
Ain’t life weird and unpredictable? Quirky family moments and formative teenage memories await in Everything’s Gonna Be Okay.
Today is a momentous day since this will be my very first TV show that I’ve covered on this blog! I don’t know about you, but I’m feeling especially excited to dive into this one, and I apologize in advance for any format issues or incoherency that may appear in this review. Being my first TV show review, I’m still feeling out what works best in terms of what to focus on and how to arrange my thoughts for a different style. Of course I’ll do whatever I can to make sure this review is easy to read, but it’s still probable that mistakes will occur.
With that out of the way, Everything’s Gonna Be Okay! A show with a title that would make you swear that it was a meditation series. After a long watch session (one that I had to extend the deadline for posting this review to begin with), I’d say I liked this show fine. I can’t say anything in this show is especially groundbreaking in terms of visuals, characters, or story, but it did happen to break records in terms of representation. To be perfectly candid like Rosa Diaz, you just can’t have a conversation about this show without mentioning this subject because it’s the first show ever to put a major spotlight on characters with autism and have each of the actors portraying those characters be autistic as well. You’d think this wouldn’t be an especially difficult record to break, but it’s taken the human race until the year 2020 to do it so take that as you will.
Outside of that, the show mainly focuses on the relatability of its characters and situations, as well as creating an environment which is realistic and believable. For being labeled a comedy show, it doesn’t have very many laugh-out-loud (or lol if you’re a Gen-Z’er) moments and I didn’t find myself laughing very hard for the majority of its episodes if at all honestly. Since the realism of the show can take over a lot of the time, the tone seems to juggle back and forth to the point where you can’t seem to tell if they’re going for a funny moment, a tender moment, an uncomfortable moment, or a sad moment. Maybe that’s just because I’m on the autism spectrum as well and am having a hard time reading the social cues that this show is giving off while I watch it.
This may also have something to do with the show’s editing. To some people that may seem like an odd thing to criticize, but I genuinely believe that most of the problems in this show are in its editing. All of the elements to make this show funny are present in what I can see on screen, but they just aren’t utilized in a way that’s satisfying. Sometimes they can hold on a scene for too long diluting the humor in it to the point where it becomes awkward, they can cut abruptly to another scene before properly finishing a joke, or they don’t even show a scene in its entirety where they’ll cut to it in the middle of the action so we don’t even see the setup for the situation we’re watching and still cut away from it too early so we end up questioning why the scene was even included to begin with.
In terms of comedy I can’t help but feel like this show is significantly held back by its tonal shifts and editing issues, but it does still portray its characters in a way that makes you believe they’re real and relate to them in a meaningful way. Much of this show’s charm is based off of the characters themselves and how they interact off of each other like a real dysfunctional unit and the acting/writing fully supports that. When I see them talk to each other I can’t help but feel like I’m not really watching a show, but instead looking through a window into someone’s life.
With all that being said, I think I’ve done enough introduction, let’s actually drop our father’s casket and get into it for real. This is Everything’s Gonna Be Okay!
The basic premise of the show is that it follows a family of three where the older half-brother Nicholas (played by Josh Thomas) gains custody of his two younger half-sisters Matilda and Genevieve (played by Kayla Cromer and Maeve Press) after the death of their father due to cancer in the first episode. That’s essentially it. What follows couldn’t be any more of a ‘slice-of-life’ type of show which shows the trios’ exploits trying to figure out what it means to be a family when none of them know what they’re doing.
While there isn’t much of a continuing story, there are at least some elements in the show that remind you of the passage of time. For one, Nicholas has a boyfriend named Alex (played by Adam Faison) who sticks with him throughout the entirety of the show. There are moments when their relationship is called into question, even a moment when they split up due to miscommunication and perceived heartlessness on the part of Nicholas, but I always felt invested in their relationship. It feels especially genuine and their characters are written and acted so believably that I do want them to work out in the end.
If I did have one gripe about the characters, I really feel like Nicholas can be annoying. Like headache-inducing annoying. Both he and Alex can be cute together when they’re laid back, cuddling, and enjoying each other’s company, but more often than not when there is an issue in their relationship it’s due to Nicholas completely screwing up some basic aspect of human interaction that makes him look stupid and even cruel. I know by the end of the show he ends up getting diagnosed with autism, but it doesn’t make any of those previous moments earlier in the show easier to watch for me, even as an autistic person myself. There’s even a moment where in order to properly apologize to Alex for something Nicholas did earlier, Alex ends up Googling the steps for crafting a sincere apology for Nicholas to follow and he still doesn’t do it correctly. To me it comes across less quirky or comedic and instead more frustrating that he can’t follow simple instructions.
Although, I think I might be picking on Nicholas a bit too much, because yes while those things do irritate me, it does speak to how much these characters are written like real people. That’s the thing about real people is that they’re not always going to do what you want them to do, and often times they can surprise you, either for better or for worse. Nicholas is written as spontaneous doing the first thing that comes into his mind without question or rational thought, and rarely, if ever, do you know what he’s thinking. While some things he does can be very humorous setups, sometimes we aren’t even given those moments to laugh at.
For example, in one moment Alex and Nicholas go on a couples trip to Mexico and upon ordering room service Nicholas gets the bright idea to pour seafood on top of Alex’s head while they’re in the bathtub. Honestly that sounds like a pretty funny setup on paper, but in the show we don’t even get to see it. All that we get is the argument between the two of them that takes place afterwards which goes on for a solid 2 minutes. While that may not seem like that long, when it’s just non-stop bickering and an unpleasant angry couple it really drives me up the wall. I would’ve loved to laugh at that premise if I had gotten a chance to see it, but instead they decided to focus on every argument my parents ever had as a kid. Please just let me laugh at you show!
Okay, getting back on track. I hadn’t thought that I would’ve gotten that emotional over something like that, but I think it does go back to the classification of the show itself. Everywhere I checked people list this show as a comedy, but I personally don’t think that kind of category works well for it. I don’t think the show exaggerates enough situations or plays up the absurdity of life enough for it to be considered a comedy. Given what I said before, I think the show does work better as an off-beat slice-of-life. Every episode just feels like people in their natural habitat, and also people I would like to get to know better (except Nicholas). I would probably be more forgiving of these kinds of decisions which prioritize realism over comedy if the show was more up-front about what it was at its core, but instead I feel forced to judge it based on comedic criteria.
If I were to focus on what the show is though as opposed to what it’s trying to be, it succeeds pretty well at it. This also reminds me I haven’t discussed any of the other major players in the show, the two sisters Matilda and Genevieve. Matilda is the older sister who is also autistic which they do not shy away from on the show at all. In fact, I may even go so far as to say that’s the majority of her character. If this show were to be released in any year earlier than 2018, I think this likely would’ve been a major problem, but they handle it in a way that’s believable and even relatable. That last part may just be the fact that I’m autistic myself, but I digress. This may also be because Kayla Cromer, Matilda’s actress, is autistic along with all of the other actors playing autistic characters in the show whom appear in Matilda’s special needs class. Each of them bring something new and charming to the show which makes them seem all the more real truly showcasing the spectrum that autism is including Matilda’s girlfriend Drea (played by Lillian Carrier) whom she ends up marrying by the end. When she’s 18. That still weirds me out to say. *insert image of me tugging at shirt collar uncomfortably*
Second is Genevieve who is probably one of the most grounded characters in the show outside of Alex and throws a healthy dose of sarcasm into the mix. She’s smart, interesting, embarrassingly weak when physically assaulting people, and rarely seen without her friends Tellulah and Barb (played by Ivy Wolk and Lori Mae Hernandez). Genevieve also had a third friend at the beginning of the show who disappears by the second episode and is never brought up again. We never even get to learn her name and it still confuses me why she was even there to begin with, but it is what it is. They hang out, have girl talk (like what their buttholes look like), catfish Barb’s mom, partake in unknown prescription medication, it’s a grand ol’ time. Upon closer inspection as well, while there are more comedic setups explored amongst the other characters in the show, there are more comedic payoffs with Genevieve and her friend group. Even then, those payoffs can be partial or weak. The show even mentions some of those previous moments in a more blasé attitude than I did when I wrote them just now.
Beyond all of that though, the show is very good at getting the viewer invested in the lives of the people on screen. While I can’t say that I laughed at every joke I heard, in fact I rarely did that, I did at least find myself caring what happens to these people. Matilda badly wants to get into Juilliard to become a composer and I felt myself biting my nails over whether she’d get in or not. After that, I was not only relieved that she did, but that when accounting for her autism, she may not be able to attend since the show takes place in California and Juilliard is in New York City of course, so they acknowledge she still may not be able to go since they don’t know if she’d be able to handle herself in a big city. Ultimately she decides she can’t do it and I was legit bummed to see she wouldn’t be going to her dream school. There’re a lot of moments like this as well, such as the death of their father in the first episode that really makes you empathize with the characters and how Nicholas, Matilda, and Genevieve learn to live together. To reiterate, while Nicholas can be frustrating, I do still want him and Alex to be together since they have great chemistry and I like seeing them in each other’s arms. Genevieve also has a couple relationships she explores throughout the show which are almost criminally relatable. Matilda gets rejected by a boy she likes early on in the show because he doesn’t want to date an autistic person. All of these things really make everything feel real which is one of the best strengths of any piece of media like this.
I do have to admit that even the slice-of-life feel can be a bit much sometimes. Mainly in regards to the ending. The fact is that once the show gets to its final episode, Matilda and her new girlfriend Drea get married (again 18, ew!), Alex has split up with Nicholas but wants to get back together after learning about his diagnosis, Drea’s parents are being weird at the reception…and it just stops. Yeah, it doesn’t so much end rather then…stop. The final end credits scene off the show is just Nicholas and Genevieve brushing their teeth together. That’s it. In the end it kinda leaves you empty, knowing that there will probably be more things to do after this, but the creators aren’t going to show it. While it does feel more authentic to real life, it would’ve been nice to have at least some kind of epilogue or resolution as opposed to just…stopping. Either way, that’s all I have for this show, and to be real, despite the problems I have with it I do still recommend it.
While it’s definitely not as funny as I would’ve hoped, it does still deliver on a family show that is interesting and detailed in its relationships. Also when I say family show I don’t mean this show is for families to watch, there is way too much sex in this for that to be the case. What I mean is as a show centered around a family working out their differences and learning from each other to become better people, it does still do that.
Nicholas is still my least favorite character of the bunch, but even I can’t deny that he does go through some growth by the end of the show which does make him at least somewhat more tolerable. To me this shows that the creators of this show do still want the focus to be on the emotional heart of these characters and their struggles which is more than I could’ve asked for in an alleged comedy show. After all, in my opinion if there’s anything this comedy show is lacking in it’s the comedy, but if you would still like to take a journey with unconventional characters that leaves you emotionally supported, I’d say this is a good show to check out. Overall, if I were to rate it on comedy criteria I’d give it a 2.5/5 West African Cockroaches, but on what the show is and what it ultimately accomplishes, I’ll give it a 3.5/5 West African Cockroaches. By the way Nicholas is an entomologist. I merely reported on this because the show merely reported on this.
Also, of course I wouldn’t show you a picture of a West African Cockroach, I care about you.
Thank you so much to commenter MoppaOppa for suggesting this show!
If you have any other suggestions for me, feel free to send me an email on my Contact Page. Thank you for reading!
(I make no claim of ownership for the image used in this post)
(It’s owned entirely by its respective copyright holders which are not me)
(I am just a humble blogger who talks about movies and shows, I do not make them)
(Yet)